Why does homosexuality exist?

Page 3 of 8 [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

SapphoWoman
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 387
Location: South Florida

20 Apr 2008, 4:25 pm

Other animals known to display homosexual or bisexual behavior:

dolphin
giraffe
black swan
bonobo
walrus



miss_e
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 38
Location: USA

20 Apr 2008, 5:25 pm

SapphoWoman wrote:
miss_e wrote:
a lot of people ask me "what made you become bi?" and i simply answer with "the reason i am bi is the same reason you are straight..i'm just born that way"

GREAT ANSWER!


thank you :D


_________________
So deep, that it didn't even bleed and catch me
Off guard, red handed
Now I'm far from lonely
Asleep, I still see you lying next to me
So deep that it didn't even bleed and catch me
--The Used


lotuspuppy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 995
Location: On a journey to the center of the mind

21 Apr 2008, 1:18 am

EvilKimEvil wrote:
Our closest relatives, bonobos (aka pygmy chimpanzees) are highly sexual creatures. They use sex for a number of different social purposes, from greeting to conflict resolution. This means that most are behaviorally bisexual.

Humans are also more sexual than most other animals. No matter what our orientation, we have sex more frequently and for purposes other than reproduction. I think that the diversity in human sexuality may have something to do with the unusually high sex drive shared by our species in general.

If that's true, then one must wonder why sex has become so taboo in many societies. I think that sex is one of those things where the biological and social drives are inseparable, a bit like language is.



Veresae
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,023

21 Apr 2008, 7:46 pm

Eh, it's not like things evolve because of some purpose. It's chaotic. Unexplainable random s**t happens in nature all the time. It's beautiful, I think. XD



Mark198423
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,974
Location: Salford, England

22 Apr 2008, 5:55 pm

lotuspuppy wrote:
EvilKimEvil wrote:
Our closest relatives, bonobos (aka pygmy chimpanzees) are highly sexual creatures. They use sex for a number of different social purposes, from greeting to conflict resolution. This means that most are behaviorally bisexual.

Humans are also more sexual than most other animals. No matter what our orientation, we have sex more frequently and for purposes other than reproduction. I think that the diversity in human sexuality may have something to do with the unusually high sex drive shared by our species in general.

If that's true, then one must wonder why sex has become so taboo in many societies.


Probably because many societies didn't study things in such great detail, until more recently at least!


I'm not sure if it's genetic, it's already been suggested that homosexuals do mate which is true - I personaly know a few with children, and there are some that donate sperm too.
I've also known a few families with a few homosexual members so there could be good argument for it being genes.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

22 Apr 2008, 7:11 pm

Sexuality itself serves purposes other than reproduction.

Homosexuality satisfies purposes other than reproduction, without the inconvenience of unwanted pregnancy.

You might as well ask: why masturbate? Why not make it your goal to cause a pregnancy with every ejaculation?



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

22 Apr 2008, 7:56 pm

^Good point, I didn't know how to put that in my earlier post.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

22 Apr 2008, 8:21 pm

This is probably not a question that could ever be definitively answered. It is possible that homosexuality could eventually be described, though it hasn't been to date. (For one thing I'm straight but have a strange little crush on another guy right now, and the "it's how your wired" explanation at present seems to trivialise that excessively) But I can't imagine how it could be explained in the sense that a bridge falling down can be explained.



Nintenderek17
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 19

23 Apr 2008, 7:53 am

miss_e wrote:
you make a good point..and i can't respond..i'll just go think this out :D


Your half right, and so is the genetic theory. It's kinda a mix of both. You see, there is a region on the x chromosome which controls homosexuality. They don't know how it works, but after studying the matter a bit since my best friend is a lesbian, I do have a personal belief. You see some people are more likely to get this gene then others. That's just how some genes work. There are some genes which stay dormant though, unless activated by life experience. I believe the homosexual area of the gene to be like that, where a lot of people get it, and then some of them have it activated by their life experience.



DanteRF
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 229
Location: Mars, PA & Slippery Rock University

23 Apr 2008, 1:05 pm

I has to do with early pregnacy. Males and females are very similar, almost identical. Sometimes the mind and body are not placed correctly. Since a male mind might be in a female and vice versa, they tend to like what the other would. Thats why there is no "cure" for gay as some say. Even the gay person may not want to be gay but because of the mishap in the womb thats how they are.



the_incident
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 110
Location: United States of America

23 Apr 2008, 4:07 pm

Daewoodrow wrote:
Well, i'm straight, so psychologically speaking I can't comment on what motivates it. The thing is, homosexuality, as you said, serves no purpose. In fact, it is couterproductive to your utimate goal in life, which is the preservation and continuation of your genetic code. As living organisms we serve no other purpose. I don't consider it a disease, and I certainly don't dislike homosexuality. In fact, i'd say I hold no opinion on the matter whatsoever. From a scientific standpoint, it's a disorder, either psychological or genetic, at present there is no way of knowing.
I know i'm going to produce some sort of moral outrage for saying this, but I do believe there is something wrong with a person who is homosexual, I just don't believe they should be shunned for it. Afterall, it's none of my business what happens to another person's genetic code, and some people choose not to have children anyway irrespective of their sexual preference.


I think I agree with this statement the most.

Biologically, homosexuality serves no purpose and can be properly described as a sexual dysfunction. One might similarly ask: "Why does zoophilia exist?"

There is also a difference between a homosexual act and a sexual attraction to the same gender. As others have pointed out, a man who is attracted to a man is not necessarily prevented from having sex with a woman and procreating. But the purpose of the attraction is to encourage the behavior.

Also, as others have pointed out, some animals engage in homosexual behavior for reasons pertaining to their social order. Since human culture is infinitely more complex than animal culture, I'll leave it up to the geniuses to determine what cultural purpose homosexuality serves for humans. The only example I can think of is a straight male who engages in homosexual sex for money, but doesn't particularly enjoy it.

Of course I'm not trying to disparage or malign anyone. I myself have several dysfunctions and wouldn't pass judgement on somebody else.

ETA: It also just occurred to me that animals have much more limited means of expression, so perhaps they are forced to use sexual communication for several purposes. For example, if your boss is mad at you, he can fire you, reprimand you, yell at you, demote you, punch you, etc. If you're a monkey then maybe he just holds you down and nails you.


_________________
I'm not autistic, although I do not consider myself neurotypical. I've been diagnosed with major depression and socially avoidant personality. Bonus: bipolar disorder.
~My soul must be iron, because my fear is naked.~


Last edited by the_incident on 23 Apr 2008, 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

23 Apr 2008, 4:09 pm

DanteRF wrote:
I has to do with early pregnacy. Males and females are very similar, almost identical. Sometimes the mind and body are not placed correctly. Since a male mind might be in a female and vice versa, they tend to like what the other would. Thats why there is no "cure" for gay as some say. Even the gay person may not want to be gay but because of the mishap in the womb thats how they are.


??

What evidence do you have that it has to do with, premature birth? I think they would have noticed a correlation by now, got any figures?

Gestation is very complex, it does control development but I think you are making a gross oversimplification at best.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

23 Apr 2008, 4:33 pm

I disagree with a lot of people. Most evolutionary scientists these days are not purely stuck on natural selection.

The main thing to remember about evolution is not concerned with the individual, it is merely what happens in the present. However intelligent animals are highly individual and more so if they need together live in big numbers, when it is not feasible to fight for territory all the time.

Also within an eco system you might think that an animal’s role is to eliminate all completion and pass only its genes, but in doing so they could become extinct. There are diseccomies in doing too well. Simply catering to this ‘biological need’ doesn’t mean they will evolve more quickly.

Overpopulation, pollution, etc are diseccecomies of human evolution and advances. We have made many technological advances, but our physical evolution is still a very slow rate. In fact the fastest evolving animals tend to be the simplest. We wouldn’t attribute ‘consciousness’ to them. Even our technology is not evolving fact enough for the problems were are creating.



DanteRF
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 229
Location: Mars, PA & Slippery Rock University

23 Apr 2008, 6:11 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
DanteRF wrote:
I has to do with early pregnacy. Males and females are very similar, almost identical. Sometimes the mind and body are not placed correctly. Since a male mind might be in a female and vice versa, they tend to like what the other would. Thats why there is no "cure" for gay as some say. Even the gay person may not want to be gay but because of the mishap in the womb thats how they are.


??

What evidence do you have that it has to do with, premature birth? I think they would have noticed a correlation by now, got any figures?

Gestation is very complex, it does control development but I think you are making a gross oversimplification at best.


You know those people that have sex change operations. Sometimes the naturally have either more testostrone or estrogen then they should given their sex, where the balance of hormones us what you'd see in the opposite sex. That's what I believe.

And there is no answer it is unknown so people are putting theories.



Mark198423
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,974
Location: Salford, England

24 Apr 2008, 9:13 am

Nintenderek17 wrote:
miss_e wrote:
you make a good point..and i can't respond..i'll just go think this out :D


Your half right, and so is the genetic theory. It's kinda a mix of both. You see, there is a region on the x chromosome which controls homosexuality. They don't know how it works, but after studying the matter a bit since my best friend is a lesbian, I do have a personal belief. You see some people are more likely to get this gene then others. That's just how some genes work. There are some genes which stay dormant though, unless activated by life experience. I believe the homosexual area of the gene to be like that, where a lot of people get it, and then some of them have it activated by their life experience.


You could have something here. In a previous job we had a young lesbian start who I became friends with, after a while I got to know her and she told me various things that had happened through her life. It seems that all bad experiences she'd had were with men (some pretty bad too) from very early on and all the comforting women in her life were women (including a gay aunt).
She'd never liked men in her life but told me that I was the first guy she'd really got on so well with.
She quite promtly turned straight and has been ever since as far as I know. All it took was her to have good male experiences to change her. I'm not saying it'd be that this for all homosexuals but it fit's with what you say I think!



Aspie_Chav
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,931
Location: Croydon

24 Apr 2008, 11:34 am

sgrannel wrote:
The same might be asked regarding aspie traits. If the trait reduces the likelihood of reproducing, then why does it persist? Are aspies the result of a rearrangment of a finite capacity for talent? Are there still aspies and homosexuals because they somehow promoted the survival of their tribe over other tribes that didn't produce them, even though they're not reproductively favored as individuals? Remember also that people who identify as primarily homosexual do sometimes have children.


I agree. That’s much of what I would say. Having a gay person in the community can be an advanged. They often do a lot of work in the community and if they had children that hard work would be compromised. The attention and love they have for the community would be directed instead to the child.

This my go to explain why in many religions high statues religion persons are required an oath of celibacy. A heterosexual priest if allowed to have children’s would have a big temptation to steal from church to fund the rising of his children.