I don't want to date poor people

Page 21 of 35 [ 558 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 35  Next

Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

04 Sep 2016, 9:01 am

KimD wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Marshall, you are so right.

I've thought this for a long time now.

I'm all for women being 'independent' and being as educated and financially well-off as possible, but it is in my experiences many women are hypergamous - they choose to 'date-up' and want a man more well-off than they are in many to all aspects of life.

Even if a woman isn't hypergamous, it's in my experiences most men and women want someone equal to them educationally, financially and career-wise.

This leaves most aspie men and women in the dust, as our struggles to keep-up with the rat race are becoming more and more difficult in modern times.


"Also, I never blamed women. I just get annoyed at particular women."

Same here.

But really, I AM all for women being independent. I'm just pointing out with free speech that it doesn't always have a positive impact.


Women shouldn't be blamed for these sorts of things (and neither should men), but when you cite specific examples, it sounds like that's what you're doing. If your dating experience is limited and predominantly bad (you seem to be hinting at that--I'm not assuming it), then your personal experience may be having a stronger impact on your point of view than it would if you have had a more varied, more-or-less positive experience.

The pressure on a woman to make babies (whether she wants to or not) is tremendous; perhaps if women are searching for men who make more, it's at least in part because they want to be sure they don't end up on welfare. As you pointed out, many people want someone who makes about the same as they do, but many men would feel emasculated by women who make more than they. Of course, it's not all about the money; it's about commonalities that can also come from similar education and social status, and again, that's basically a universal thing that has existed for a very long time.


KimD wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Marshall, you are so right.

I've thought this for a long time now.

I'm all for women being 'independent' and being as educated and financially well-off as possible, but it is in my experiences many women are hypergamous - they choose to 'date-up' and want a man more well-off than they are in many to all aspects of life.

Even if a woman isn't hypergamous, it's in my experiences most men and women want someone equal to them educationally, financially and career-wise.

This leaves most aspie men and women in the dust, as our struggles to keep-up with the rat race are becoming more and more difficult in modern times.


"Also, I never blamed women. I just get annoyed at particular women."

Same here.

But really, I AM all for women being independent. I'm just pointing out with free speech that it doesn't always have a positive impact.


Women shouldn't be blamed for these sorts of things (and neither should men), but when you cite specific examples, it sounds like that's what you're doing. If your dating experience is limited and predominantly bad (you seem to be hinting at that--I'm not assuming it), then your personal experience may be having a stronger impact on your point of view than it would if you have had a more varied, more-or-less positive experience.

The pressure on a woman to make babies (whether she wants to or not) is tremendous; perhaps if women are searching for men who make more, it's at least in part because they want to be sure they don't end up on welfare. As you pointed out, many people want someone who makes about the same as they do, but many men would feel emasculated by women who make more than they. Of course, it's not all about the money; it's about commonalities that can also come from similar education and social status, and again, that's basically a universal thing that has existed for a very long time.


I'm sorry.

I wasn't sure how else to word it without coming across as sexist.

Like I said I don't have a problem with it, and I don't blame women personally.

Just trying to say that it is what it is.

I feel the pressure to be successful in today's world is immense and much harder to live up to.

Many jobs today that are becoming obsolete were also the kind of stuff we'd be good at, e.g. jobst hat don't require much social interaction are being replaced by machines, etc.

"Of course, it's not all about the money; it's about commonalities that can also come from similar education and social status, and again, that's basically a universal thing that has existed for a very long time."

What could I do then?

I don't share enough commonalities with girls of my own background racially and socio-economically, nor do I share enough commonalities with middle class girls.

My actual dating experience may be limited but that doesn't mean I didn't pursue a wide-variety of different kinds of girls and learnt much about them only to be rejected.

I am also referring to getting along with girls and males for friendship as well, and I find I am not compatible with those that are middle class as we share very little life experiences or understanding of one another.

Anyway, that's just how I've always seen it - men want a woman earning equal or lower (but not TOO much lower), women want someone equal or higher. Not trying to make a sexist generalization, just an observation.

Even aspie women may have a lot more to live up to as I'm seeing from a lot of males nowadays they want a woman at least 75% as successful as they are (while my personal cutoff is about 50% as ambitious and hardworking in all areas of life as I am or higher).

RetroGamer, I will respond to you maybe later or tomorrow, it's late and I don't have the time at the moment.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Sep 2016, 11:53 am

KimD wrote:
Being around too much bad news, too much anger, too much negative "energy" isn't good for anyone. I think often of my older brother who keeps a certain news channel on in the background almost all day; I think it's not the only reason he can be such a pessimistic, bitter grump, but it sure doesn't help at all. He's retired now and I think it's more important than ever that he finds more hobbies that take him away from the TV.

Most of the negative feelings I get reading this thread come from this constant talk of the rat-race. It's this notion that everything we do in life must be a means to an end, the end being the gaining of social status. I mean, what kind of people are motivated this way? Not interesting people in my book. People who define themselves and put such great importance on their career are not interesting people in my book. Having a fancy degree does not automatically make people intellectually interesting. Intellectually interesting people are curious. Status-driven automatons are boring. People who do things solely for the purpose of making money and "impressing girls" are boring to me. I'm no interested in social status. It's f*****g boring to me. Incurious people who pride themselves in their "work ethic" and judge anyone who doesn't are boring. If I am forced into this game I will consider suicide. I'm serious. I don't owe this sterile world s**t. My only option is to find what makes me happy. I can't tolerate being unhappy. I mean, what the hell is the point of living? People are expected to waste more than half of their waking life "working", for what? I understand why the lemming herd pushes "work ethic", yea, the world would fall apart if nobody worked. Of course they are programmed to shame those who hate modern "work". They are part of the machine's function. What I don't get is that we work just for the sake of working. I don't understand why people don't just threaten suicide strike. Maybe the capitalist overlords will think twice if people would rather die than live the life they foist upon people.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Sep 2016, 12:56 pm

I hate the way ambition is defined as "career goals". If you can't find work that you enjoy, you're not going to be motivated by "ambition". Your ambition will be towards hobby projects. Why does ambition only apply to things you can get money for? What about people who don't want to go into massive debt by going to a university, but still want to self-study a topic of their interest out of pure curiosity? Does that not count as ambition? Apparently not. Only activities directed towards climbing the social latter are counted towards "ambition". Can you have ambition towards studying law if you think law is boring as hell? What if you'd rather study science or literature? Contrary to popular opinion, studying science doesn't always lead to lucrative and enjoyable career. If you want to be a research professor you have to "publish or perish", and that involves obtaining grands from other people who decide what you can research, regardless of whether you're genuinely interested. A lot of the grants come from the corporate overlords who have the money and power to dictate what they want scientists to research. There is no escape. To make money you have to climb the social latter and that involves kissing ass and doing s**t you hate.



Last edited by marshall on 04 Sep 2016, 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,107
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

04 Sep 2016, 1:29 pm

Kiran wrote:
meems wrote:
If she never knows he's the greatest guy she'll ever meet I don't think she'll feel loss as a result of rejecting him. Since he's being rejected in this hypothetical, he'll probably be the one feeling like he lost out on his chance to date her, because he couldn't even pay his phone bill.

Another hypothetical... there's the possibility that if she compromises and dates a poor guy, she might think he's the greatest guy she'll ever meet and then look back later in life and realize she's wasted her time trying to make a relationship work with a guy who can't even manage to pay his phone bill... I think that might cause a feeling of loss.


I'm not really talking about feelings of loss but about actual loss. When she rejects him she will not feel a loss, but she will actually lose the chance to be with a great guy. And the guy may feel loss when she rejects him, but he will actually win something in the long run: not being with a woman who resents him for being poor. I know men who have wifes who resents them for being poor, and believe me it would have been best for them if these women would have rejected them in the first place. It would have saved them decades of misery.



Kiran wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Kiran wrote:
If you want to be materialistic, it's your choice. There are no laws against that. But you should know this: the greatest guy you're ever gonna meet may be a poor guy. And when you reject him, it will be your loss, not his.


Its actually his loss. She doesn't want to date him! Nice guiltrip though.


No, he wins. He doesn't have to be with a shallow, materialistic woman. And she should feel guilty. She can't love a man because he's poor?! WTF?! That's like saying you can't love someone because they're black or short or tall or green eyed or something else the person has no control over.


^ Who was that member "Kiran"?

I would have crossed the oceans to marry her.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,103
Location: Adelaide, Australia

04 Sep 2016, 4:07 pm

^ I wonder if her avatar is actually a picture of her. If so she's very pretty.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

04 Sep 2016, 4:19 pm

If I had the money to support us both I'd have no problem dating a poor girl. Hell, I'd be happy for her to not work at all if she'd rather be hobby-orientated then spending her life slaving away at a job that brings her no gratification for money we don't need.

A shame I don't have that money though.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm

Sabreclaw wrote:
If I had the money to support us both I'd have no problem dating a poor girl. Hell, I'd be happy for her to not work at all if she'd rather be hobby-orientated then spending her life slaving away at a job that brings her no gratification for money we don't need.

A shame I don't have that money though.

My problem trying to work full time while single was spanding 10 hours a day working (includes commuting), AND having to do everything else, shop, cook, clean, etc... Not having a car means shopping every day after work so I can carry it. No free time at all until late evening. By that time I'm too exhausted and depressed to enjoy my free time. Yea, and I'll have to make up for being exhausted by sleeping till noon over the weekend. f**k that. Maybe with heavy amphetamines I can be a normal person.

If women think staying home and doing the housework is somehow subordinate and demeaning, why don't they just let the husband stay home and do house work? Why the hell does the husband HAVE to work full time? Part time + house work I will gladly do. Full time + house work + alone = hell.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,103
Location: Adelaide, Australia

04 Sep 2016, 7:08 pm

Marshall, do you think it would be better if only one member of a couple worked while the other concentrated on housework?


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Sep 2016, 7:16 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
Marshall, do you think it would be better if only one member of a couple worked while the other concentrated on housework?

I don't think both should have to work full time.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

04 Sep 2016, 8:18 pm

marshall wrote:
KimD wrote:
Being around too much bad news, too much anger, too much negative "energy" isn't good for anyone. I think often of my older brother who keeps a certain news channel on in the background almost all day; I think it's not the only reason he can be such a pessimistic, bitter grump, but it sure doesn't help at all. He's retired now and I think it's more important than ever that he finds more hobbies that take him away from the TV.

Most of the negative feelings I get reading this thread come from this constant talk of the rat-race. It's this notion that everything we do in life must be a means to an end, the end being the gaining of social status. I mean, what kind of people are motivated this way? Not interesting people in my book. People who define themselves and put such great importance on their career are not interesting people in my book. Having a fancy degree does not automatically make people intellectually interesting. Intellectually interesting people are curious. Status-driven automatons are boring. People who do things solely for the purpose of making money and "impressing girls" are boring to me. I'm no interested in social status. It's f*****g boring to me. Incurious people who pride themselves in their "work ethic" and judge anyone who doesn't are boring. If I am forced into this game I will consider suicide. I'm serious. I don't owe this sterile world s**t. My only option is to find what makes me happy. I can't tolerate being unhappy. I mean, what the hell is the point of living? People are expected to waste more than half of their waking life "working", for what? I understand why the lemming herd pushes "work ethic", yea, the world would fall apart if nobody worked. Of course they are programmed to shame those who hate modern "work". They are part of the machine's function. What I don't get is that we work just for the sake of working. I don't understand why people don't just threaten suicide strike. Maybe the capitalist overlords will think twice if people would rather die than live the life they foist upon people.



Problem is, most "normal" men and women want someone to go the conformist route and achieve whatever the heck "success" is.

I even see MANY aspie women here express disinterest in aspie men not "working on overcoming their difficulties" when they REALLY mean joining the rat race, studying and working towards a career.

Everything you have said is spot on and I share your opinion on everything here.

But I am also still realistic.

Almost every person in my life I've met against the rat race in the way you describe either have severe mental illnesses I can't handle, traumatic backgrounds and no 'ambition' in other areas, or the severely disabled/low functional/can't dress themselves let alone work.

You appear to believe anyone who subscribes to t conformist way of life regarding education and career must he a superficial person not worth dating.

The grim reality is that most of them are average, ordinary people, and want to only date someone else who can live up to averageness.

Also, average is average and so will beost people you encounter in your life.



morugin
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 28 Aug 2016
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 33

04 Sep 2016, 8:20 pm

whatamess wrote:
ah, well, I'll tell you the honest truth...my story...

I was raised to not look at money when determining who to date...so that's how I thought I should be. I dated a few guys who were either middle class or upper class (we were middle class, I thought...maybe a little upper, just didn't show it much) and I hated the fact that they felt that class had a major impact on whom they decided to date. Fact is, it seemed that I just couldn't deal with someone like that...although they had no problem with me.

Eventually, out of all the guys that I could have married, I married the poorest...he was raised poor and was poor when we met. I helped him get a better job, etc...I supported our home for many years...eventually, he did much better...we actually get along pretty well...our major issues in our relationship? MONEY! Yes, his family has always hated me and been jealous of what I had, how I grew up, how WE together lived thanks to me, etc...his ex-wife even more, of course, she was lower class and actually, a big loser...Everyday I realize more how much I've had to give up, how much our son has had to sacrifice because of this...and yes, I do love my husband...but if I had to do it all again, I can tell you that marriages are difficult enough without having the family jealous of you, how you live, how you were raised...it's as if we couldn't have anything nice without them attempting to take it from us, to ask us for stuff (they all just have babies and sit on their behinds), etc...and life is too short to have people like that in your life. I'm not saying that I need someone to support me, or that I want someone rich...but I think that our life would have been much easier if his family was at least as well off as mine, etc...as that jealousy, constant attempting to make us feel bad for living well, or worse, doing anything they could to take away from us has truly drained our relationship and we now have ended up with the choice of our son having no contact with ANYONE in his family to keep him away from the jealousy, etc...we can't have a dinner together and talk about a vacation without the snobby remarks, etc...and believe me, I am NOT a snob. I worked my behind off for 20yrs to have what I had...it's mostly gone thanks to the jealousy of his family and ex and of course, the fact that his crappy family never taught my husband how to balance a checkbook, how to have a decent life, etc...it's taken years for him to finally understand and we are now 42yrs old...the only reason I have remained is because he is very good to our son and our son loves him dearly...otherwise, the nightmare of his jealous family, ex and kid he has with his ex (who of course, lives better than us now because although her mom is a loser, the courts make him pay her as if she deserved it and not our son...of course, I SACRIFICED myself, my income to give him that better job, he would have never had that job if he had remained with the loser he was married to before...)...etc...

So, my advice, continue to do what you are doing. This does NOT mean you have to be mean to people who have less than you...honestly, as my husband, he is a very nice person...not his fault he had such crappy parents that never taught him how to balance a checkbook, etc...but just tell them you're not interested...

Good luck...sorry for being brutally honest...and anyone else who may be offended...but the more you have in common with how you were raised with your spouse/girlfriend, etc...the better your relationship will be...


I have to say this because it is not ok for the powerful to get to think they are good just because they are powerful.
As someone who grew up poor, I need to tell you and others who grew up with money.
You did not earn your position in life.
It was inherited from your parents.
The money, opportunity, culture, happiness, all if it was given to you, all you had to do was step into their position in society.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Sep 2016, 10:03 pm

Outrider wrote:
Problem is, most "normal" men and women want someone to go the conformist route and achieve whatever the heck "success" is.

I don't care as long as they also have a sense of curiosity.

Quote:
I even see MANY aspie women here express disinterest in aspie men not "working on overcoming their difficulties" when they REALLY mean joining the rat race, studying and working towards a career.

I have actually. I graduated top 1% in my undergraduate school. I have a f**ing MS degree. I studied my special interests and I loved it for the most part. When it was over I lost the intellectual stimulation and got severely depressed. I haven't been able to work the way normal people do. I suppose I could do it, but I'd probably be so worn out and miserable I'd be thinking about suicide every single day.

Quote:
Everything you have said is spot on and I share your opinion on everything here.

But I am also still realistic.

Almost every person in my life I've met against the rat race in the way you describe either have severe mental illnesses I can't handle, traumatic backgrounds and no 'ambition' in other areas, or the severely disabled/low functional/can't dress themselves let alone work.

I suppose I'm an invalid then. I think about cutting off my limbs so I can have a visible problem rather than a "mental" one.

Quote:
You appear to believe anyone who subscribes to t conformist way of life regarding education and career must he a superficial person not worth dating.

Only if they can't look past whatever "flaws" they see in anyone who can't conform.

Quote:
The grim reality is that most of them are average, ordinary people, and want to only date someone else who can live up to averageness.

I don't think you can evaluate a person on a linear scale like....

below average < average < above average

That's just moronic. People have strengths and weaknesses in different areas. I'm probably in the top 1% in terms of intelligence, yet I'm simply "below average" on the rat-race scale. Imbeciles like Donald Trump are "above average". You know there are plenty of rich imbeciles who are good at gaming the system and ripping others off but not much else? They are considered "ambitious" and "successful".

Quote:
Also, average is average and so will beost people you encounter in your life.

Average can be boring too. I guess average and boring is better than someone "below average" due to being broken by their weakest link. Being good at the rat race is all that counts.



solo
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 121
Location: Cleveland

05 Sep 2016, 12:27 am

I don't have a problem dating someone poorer than me, as long as they are working towards making life better for both of us like I would be doing. I look for who the person really is. If they are drug addicts, well, that is a deal breaker for me, but if they are poor but are trying, no problem. I don't make a lot of money at all, it pisses me off when people look down on me for it because I work a lot more than most. 90+ hour weeks, 7 days a week, no overtime, no sick pay, no benefits because I have my own business. Govt. takes a lot and so does the business so I have very little left in the end. It hurts when I try so hard and most don't notice and look down on you.

Reading some people's posts in this thread makes me want to avoid humans even more.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

05 Sep 2016, 1:24 am

marshall wrote:
I don't think you can evaluate a person on a linear scale like....

below average < average < above average

That's just moronic. People have strengths and weaknesses in different areas. I'm probably in the top 1% in terms of intelligence, yet I'm simply "below average" on the rat-race scale. Imbeciles like Donald Trump are "above average". You know there are plenty of rich imbeciles who are good at gaming the system and ripping others off but not much else? They are considered "ambitious" and "successful".


Welcome to the irrationality that is this world, though I'm sure you've known just how irrational this world longer than I have.

Sly mentions having a degree, but he can't work in his chosen field.

He said in past posts people constantly question him and why he isn't working in his chosen field if he has a degree for it.

Like RetroGamer mentioned in a past post, the women he's encountered in his life would rather go for the guy with the nice car and the nice house and flashy clothes, but don't take into account income vs. spending habits.

I can't remember exactly what he said but a similar way of saying it would be the poor looking man who is dressed with old clothes could have in fact bought those clothes from a thrift store and thus saved money, and his cheap second hand car also saves money, while the rich guy with a nice brand new ferrari and flashy clothes could have blew all the money he had on both of these things.

Quote:
Average can be boring too. I guess average and boring is better than someone "below average" due to being broken by their weakest link. Being good at the rat race is all that counts.


Hm? I never said averageness isn't boring.

If anything, I believe the vast majority of the population are 'boring', including myself.

What I meant when I said that 'average is average' is that, if there is an 'average'/typical amount of success in your country and society, than this level of success will be very common for the majority of the population and can make you 'less than average' by comparison.

E.g. if 95% of high school students graduate according to the statistics, then graduating high school is considered 'average' and 'normal', and those that don't graduate high school are a statistical outlier, and by society (not by me) may be considered 'less than average'.

Just as if the unemployment rate is 5% and you are unemployed, then the majority of the population is working and therefore 'contributing' to society - it is considered a 'normal' level of success to at least have a job.

Don't confuse my opinion of what OTHERS may believe with my own.

I tend to have this issue where I misrepresent an opinion, other people thinking it's what I would think rather than what I would think that others would think.

I can see the strengths in other areas of a person if she is a high school dropout, in fact I already have before, it's just my belief that many people in 'society' would not.

If I am 30 years old and all I've ever done with my life is graduate high school and a bit of volunteer work, can drive yet still live at home, I can see the value in a woman in the same position as me in life, if she has a good personality, takes care of herself and is making whatever efforts in life that she can.

But I think it's realistic and fair to assume the majority of other men and women our age will be incapable of doing so.

People are superficial and irrational.

This thread is starting to irritate me as well because it reminds me of how awful I believe the world is.

I think the key to true love is to do away with bullsh•t dating in the first place.

I'd rather fall for a girl and the feelings were mutual than have to go through the process of 'dating'.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,107
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

05 Sep 2016, 2:05 am

I wonder, do the likes of OP would consider a high earner or middle-class from 3rd world as 'poor'? Because he would be in the poor bracket compared to the US average income.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,103
Location: Adelaide, Australia

05 Sep 2016, 2:38 am

She would probably stereotype such guys as being opportunists looking for marry their way into her country.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short