Oh girls have it so much worse....

Post Reply New Topic

Let's hope her ID won't be fake. The judge won't care either and men have been busted for it too because the minor had a fake ID. It's still the guy's fault and the minor is still the victim.

my husband and i were both tested for HIV, hep B, and hep C before we had sex. and i refused to answer his marriage proposal until after we had been dating for six months. six months isn't arbitrary.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fu ... nship-last

I did not know the health reasons were made up....my brothers the one who told me about those because our cousin was having a baby and the topic came up so. Also wouldn't banning circumcision also deny the choice to guys who decide they want it done? Seems not mandating it would make more sense in that regard.

Either way from what I have heard of both even if it is wrong to circumcise infants...seems the FGM is worse(at least more physically damaging) from what I understand, I have not seen much info to suggest otherwise.

the reasons aren't made up. even if they were, i don't understand why anyone would blame women. circumcision was started by a religion run by men.

if the policed checked her out wouldn't it be their fault?
super depressing no women can be trusted is what it sounds like, just avoid all women.?
because her family could lie, or she could get fake family or what if she lives alone and has no family. so why take risk with women at all?

if you serve a minor alcohol who had a really really good id the bar doesn't get in trouble.

should females have the option to get a type of FGM or female ciricism. the only difference is the male mutation has become common place. as I'm sure FGM is in some areas and seen as ok and needed. there are places will male mutilation is not common place and seen as bad.

you as a female have no place in a discussion about the mutation of male bodies. just as you females say we have no discussion in what happens to women's bodies. your'e never going to have to suffer from it so you see it as ok. males have to deal with it many don't like it. many of the castration people applies the same logic as circumcision and say in the future it will be accepted and common place to castrate all males at 12-13. I'm sure if they got there way some woman like you would be saying its a good idea and ok. this is called if something is common and been done for a long time its accepted as good. its why slavery was seen as good and ok for so long.

just because something has been done and continues to be done doesn't make it right. I don't think it should be legal cut off healthy parts of any human without their consent and testing to see if they are right of mind.

really don't get how cutting healty skin off a female is bad, but cutting healthy skin of a male is ok. why is ok to hurt men but not females? this seems to be the general tone with women. a man having his penis cutt of is a funny thing that women joke and laugh about, cut a woman's boob off and its kill the bastard. same thing happens here . circumcision is just common place mutilation, the key is its still mutilation. so why is it that women think male mutilation is fine and push it? why do women think its ok to hurt males.

its as plan as day here. who are the only ones defending and pushing it in this thread? all women. go oneline who are the ones defending it mostly if not all women. besides religious men. its women who push and defend it. so you have mostly men saying its bad, and women saying its needed and must be done. so yeah why would we blame women hmm.......

how stuff started and how it continues are two different things. I can start a something but if someone else continues it the blame is on them. they aren't blameless. just like the whole just following orders defense don't work. neither does well he started it.

No, it had nothing to do with nog being able to wait langer than a month. I can wait langer than a month for sure, for me it is just not necessary.

Nah, I've had my fair share of pain. To be honest I don't feel sorry for you at all with your 'pain'.

I can only get tested once a year.

well theres a whole lot of people who didn't wait and they still going strong for years.
I wouldn't propose marriage until after a year. thats not sex. that a life long commitment.

why can't you just be YOMV and let others live how they want. you don't care as much about nor want sex too soon, fine, but us wanting sex before 6 months doesn't make us bad or wrong , it just makes us different.

what what I read that is just article that goes with the generaliztion that men just want sex and sex is meaningless to men. but women its a big stepping stone and committment. well to a bunch of men it is the same. it is to me. its a form of emotional bonding.

"Having sex early in a relationship, followed by cohabitation, sets the stage for women to be less satisfied with the sex they’re having now."

so basically they had all the exciting fun sex while dating and after moving in settled into boring sex that comes from haivng sex for a long time and find boring sex not as good. so if they moved in and started having sex and a year or so later would feel the same thing o.O

then says sex leads them to not think wisely and get married. yeah because two horny people wanting to sex but waiting til marriage who then rush into marriage so they can finally have sex wont' lead to that either. seems like a situation thing. my friend did the latter. they rushed to marriage so they could have sex, they'd also dated for a few months or more. well if you could call hanging out at her house under parental supervision dating. after living togetehr for a few weeks they realized they were horrible for each other.

which is why I think couples should live together for a year before getting married. so you know you two mesh and are good for each other.

"Perhaps the main take-home message of the Sassler et al study is that it’s not the time that’s the factor, but what happens in the time, between dating and sexual intimacy. When the flames of passion die down, it’s the emotional quality of the relationship that will keep it going for the long haul. Establishing the emotional bonds between you and your partner will be the key for relationship’s ability to endure over time."

yeah I like that. see depends on the situation and the people involved. that and not assuming guys are unemotional about sex and just want to F**K and move on.

I'm not suggesting I would only sex when hang out and sex all the time. I spend a lot of time with a lady when dating. I see others do this. theres way more emotional bonding going on then sex. sex is such a low percentage of the time spent. having sex would enable us to be free of sexual urges and acutally bond instead of just thinking of sexing each other the whole time were on a date. which is what two hyper sexual people will be doing if not otherwis.

imagine you go on 1-2 dates a week . that's 4-8 dates in the month. this could be hours or whole days spent together. it might like in my case be weeks spent together. usually with me this is after texting and messaging for a week or more which you share common interests and talk about stuff. you can cram a lot of bonding into a month. some people would hang out between those official 4-8 dates as well. I just don't believe in putting arbitrary deadlines or waiting periods. each relationship can move differently. I'd rather let it go naturally then force it or make it wait for no reason. if witing 6 months works for you good. but dont' call us others who it doesn't not good or bad.

there's a reason sex cause bonding in women and some men. have you thought without that some relationships never would have worked as they'd be missing that chemical level bonding. so if they other wise match up completely. anyways whatever. sex to me is a part of commitment. Its emotional to me. I don't see it as just sex and not a big thing.
which is why I have not and will not just jump into bed with any woman. its funny though that if the guy had a 6 month limit most women would think hes not attracted to them and get mad. well men like to know the woman is mutually attracted too.

I'm done with this. I don't care what you all do I just don't like being judged.

you women should have said if a guy doesn't want to wait 6 months to sex with me then hes not a good match for me.
instead of if a guy doesn't want to wait 6 months to have sex, run away hes not worth dating.

confused. "but it would be way too long for me to abstain from sex with someone I have feelings for"

it would be too long to do something is the same as saying can't.

i agreed with you. are you disagreeing with me just to disagree with me?

no one will die from lack of sex, so can't in this subject means unwilling to, or unable to due to going crazy from hormones and being horny for the person of feelings.

so if you woldn't be able to abstain form sex for a more then a month that means you' could not do it, ie can't
now you say you can so that invalidated your previous statement where you said it would be too long.

o.O

are you changing your stance so you can support the females and side against males. though sweetleaf also said she things its not true.

Omg these comparing threads are just so stupid. And in the end still no girlfriends in their lives.

Uhm, I disagree with you because I disagree with you. You interpreted what I said the wrong way. But then again your last phrases show exactly what is your main problem: extremely paranoid.
It's funny how I come back on this messageboard after 2 months and nothing has changed. People in their usual roles.

nothing to do with comparing threads. fyi this one was started by a woman.

I just don't like women making it look like men dont' suffer and have no problems in life is all great. I don't dis agree women with Asperger suffer too. though not as much. in the grand sceme of things it doesn' really matter. but I don't like it being made out that we suffer the same, we suffer in different ways. I'd rather have the female suffering myself.
rather none of us suffer though.

not much if anything will get men like me gfs that's life. 1/5th the world population will never have love and die alone.

you are not in that 1/5 you are in the other one. you had hard times but you've also had a few boyfriends and will likely get married and live happy ever after. lots of male aspies will never even get dates, never have a gf, never get married and never live happy ever after a few of them will kill themselves and never even live full lives.

honesty it was pretty clear what this thread was, you entered knowing what it was. so why complain about it, ecept to try to hurt us 1/5 who live sh*****g lives til we end it.

just trying to figure you out.

also its not paranoid. people side with common people women will often side with women. they've tested this by having a woman and a guy fight in park and see who people side with. women side with the woman most of the time even if it is pretty clear she started it even if she hits him. its logical to side with the person more like you. why else do so many women on facebook suport women who cheated on their SO and assume she is right.

anyways you're always wierd. so you can wait so you would be able to abstain from sex for more then a month?

all I did was agree with you saing you wouldn't be able to abstain for over a month.

you're disagreeing with more word use.

also mis perfect you misspelled longer twice

Still don't feel sorry for you, just like 90% of women on here. Your posts are so repetitive. I won't pay attention to them from now on.