Why are women so desperate for men?

Page 21 of 26 [ 408 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 26  Next

sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

02 Nov 2017, 7:24 pm

BTDT wrote:
sly279 wrote:
It’s 51men/49 women basically. Which means men will no matter what be left alone and single forever unless women start taking multiple husbands.


Actually they do these days, just not at the same time. There are plenty of women who have been married more than once.

That still leaves their ex single. So unless they have two or husbands at a time or kill off their ex, there will still be 53milliom men left out. And this is after high male suicide rates.imagine what it’d be if all those men didn’t kill themselfs or the ones who died in war didn’t die.
Polyamory is the only solution. But they won’t want lessor men so it doesn’t matter. So unless a lot of women move to polygamy while also removing all their high standards there’s always going be millions of single to death men.

Might also add this doesn’t take into account countries that have one husband and 30 wife’s. So really the single forever men population is higher then the excess male population.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

02 Nov 2017, 7:28 pm

TornadoEvil wrote:
Oh joy, a blatant generalist sexist topic in a self-help forum. Like actually asking for help would actually be productive. What specific thing are we trying to help with again? Validating our rage against something. Life isn’t that complicated, people try to make their way based on whats available too them. The whole point about letting people make their own decisions is not all information is available to you.

Loke abunch of aspies are any good at knowing what another person feels. :lol:

Maybe people would actually figure something out for a change if we didn’t let something like this stay up.

Asking why women are more desperate then men is more complaining then asking for help. How can I stop being desperate would be help seeking which isn’t what this thread was about.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia

02 Nov 2017, 7:40 pm

hale_bopp wrote:
I guess saying there are more men in the world is now the new excuse for getting nowhere in online dating, instead of “The problem is me”.

There is a man drought in New Zealand. There are significantly more women than men. But guys still can’t get replies on online dating sites.

There is no more chance of being born a male. None. No confirmed and proven data to back that up.

No one is saying biology is fair. Look at lions. One male mates with as many females he wants. Females and males both have their benefits and low points in all species.

But producing straw man arguments for your lack of success is ridiculous.


Then it's a good thing that, a few years ago when I had trouble getting a date I chose self-improvement rather than excuses.

If there was a man who was unemployed, uneducated and never made any attempt to improve himself, I wouldn't blame women for not wanting to date him.

If there was a woman who made no attempt to improve herself, then I wouldn't blamemen for not wanting to date her.

I think members of both sexes have to try to become capable, responsible people before they're worthy of going on a date.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

02 Nov 2017, 7:46 pm

AngelRho wrote:
Outrider wrote:
In my experience its the opposite, many men desperately desire love and sex, while many women act like they don't care about men at all and could easily do without them.

Same here. And having over twice your age on you I can tell it does NOT improve as you get older. Women do not have the same desire for intimacy that men do. After I got married, sex was down to like, twice a week or something. We got back from the honeymoon and it was like I ceased to exist within a week. After having my first kid, it was nonexistent for a while. I mean, naturally, of course it is. Things started to pick up after a year. Then there was that one day we ran out of condoms. Oops.

That's when things got BAD for us. No money, no jobs, no home. Another year went by with next to nothing. Things started to turn around for us and we started talking about baby #3. Nothing SERIOUS, just talking. Then the condom broke.

Yet another year goes by with little action. And another. And another when I wondered if she even noticed me at all. Things eventually did start to pick up. We worked up to about twice a month and called it good.

Now we're up to 3 or 4 times a month.

If she were telling this story, she'd tell you that between a job, 3 kids, keeping house, there was just no time for sex nor any real desire. She would say that working herself up to a climax was just more work, just something else she felt obligated to do to keep me happy--and not really worth the effort for herself. She'd be perfectly content to let me do what I needed to do and be done with it. That just left me feeling dirty, though. So whenever she gets horny, I'm ready and willing. But I have no idea when that will be.

Her perspective has since changed in that she feels she has neglected that part of our relationship. So...MAYBE once a week if the moon and planets align just right. She wants intimacy more, makes time for it, and actually seems to enjoy it.

Aaaaaaand we're thinking about baby #4.

lol

Which means I'll turn 60 (empty nest years) before I get any again! LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, men and women value intimacy differently. For us, half the satisfaction is seeing a satisfied woman no matter what it takes, hence why we locker-room brag about staying power. Women just want to know they are valued and don't see what the big deal is. I told him I love him; geez you'd think that would be enough! Erm...no, it's NOT enough. Words are wind. If you really cared for me, you'd enjoy being with me--and SHOW it!

Look at it another way. We both hate washing dishes. She sees a sink full of dirty dishes and thinks, crap I've got to wash dishes AGAIN. So the first thing she does is take care of the dishes.

Me? Meh...I'll get to it when I get to it. And when I finally do it, it's like climbing Mt. Everest. You don't do it every day, but you get bragging rights just for doing it once. So washing dishes is a challenge, a conquest. Look honey, I washed dishes!! ! And she's like, so?

Which leads to the question "Does it REALLY matter?" It's easy early on to get a sense of entitlement, that this is what we're SUPPOSED to do. I'm SUPPOSED to feel good and you're SUPPOSED to like making me feel good. And when kids come sometimes it's like Al Bundy on "Married: With Children." I do think women should consider whether they are taking men for granted, ask if things are cooling off at home whether they are the ones putting distance between themselves and their husbands. With husbands, same thing. Do we expect too much? Are the things we value really that important in the long run?


you only do the dishes once in a while? my husband (who proposed early on and had to wait until we knew each other better) does them every day. your wife doing dishes shows she loves you. maybe you could do them to free up her time for sex.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

02 Nov 2017, 8:02 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
I guess saying there are more men in the world is now the new excuse for getting nowhere in online dating, instead of “The problem is me”.

There is a man drought in New Zealand. There are significantly more women than men. But guys still can’t get replies on online dating sites.

There is no more chance of being born a male. None. No confirmed and proven data to back that up.

No one is saying biology is fair. Look at lions. One male mates with as many females he wants. Females and males both have their benefits and low points in all species.

But producing straw man arguments for your lack of success is ridiculous.


Then it's a good thing that, a few years ago when I had trouble getting a date I chose self-improvement rather than excuses.

If there was a man who was unemployed, uneducated and never made any attempt to improve himself, I wouldn't blame women for not wanting to date him.

If there was a woman who made no attempt to improve herself, then I wouldn't blamemen for not wanting to date her.

I think members of both sexes have to try to become capable, responsible people before they're worthy of going on a date.

Would you hold physically disabled people to those same standards or like most people would you make exceptions for them.

I’m not a normal person. I am trying to improve but I’ll never improve as much as most people. I’m reaching my peak. I’ve reached my peak job wise. Now I’ll just get a 3% raise each year along with the state raise it min wage. Eventually hopefully I’ll reach my peak body wise, though I think I’ll go bald in next 5 years which will worsen my looks. :cry:

So congrats on being able to be normal. Your basically a nt. Congrats. A lot of us are so lucky. There’s a lot of aspies here who aren’t and won’t be, there’s. Few who like you, boo, arg etc are mostly nt. Glad for you. For the rest of us we struggle to just keep going and improve at all. I’m a lot better off then most people thought I’d be from high school. I went to college a lot of autistics don’t do that.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia

02 Nov 2017, 8:45 pm

sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
I guess saying there are more men in the world is now the new excuse for getting nowhere in online dating, instead of “The problem is me”.

There is a man drought in New Zealand. There are significantly more women than men. But guys still can’t get replies on online dating sites.

There is no more chance of being born a male. None. No confirmed and proven data to back that up.

No one is saying biology is fair. Look at lions. One male mates with as many females he wants. Females and males both have their benefits and low points in all species.

But producing straw man arguments for your lack of success is ridiculous.


Then it's a good thing that, a few years ago when I had trouble getting a date I chose self-improvement rather than excuses.

If there was a man who was unemployed, uneducated and never made any attempt to improve himself, I wouldn't blame women for not wanting to date him.

If there was a woman who made no attempt to improve herself, then I wouldn't blamemen for not wanting to date her.

I think members of both sexes have to try to become capable, responsible people before they're worthy of going on a date.

Would you hold physically disabled people to those same standards or like most people would you make exceptions for them.


Yes.

Do you think that they're unable to improve?


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

02 Nov 2017, 10:19 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
I guess saying there are more men in the world is now the new excuse for getting nowhere in online dating, instead of “The problem is me”.

There is a man drought in New Zealand. There are significantly more women than men. But guys still can’t get replies on online dating sites.

There is no more chance of being born a male. None. No confirmed and proven data to back that up.

No one is saying biology is fair. Look at lions. One male mates with as many females he wants. Females and males both have their benefits and low points in all species.

But producing straw man arguments for your lack of success is ridiculous.


Then it's a good thing that, a few years ago when I had trouble getting a date I chose self-improvement rather than excuses.

If there was a man who was unemployed, uneducated and never made any attempt to improve himself, I wouldn't blame women for not wanting to date him.

If there was a woman who made no attempt to improve herself, then I wouldn't blamemen for not wanting to date her.

I think members of both sexes have to try to become capable, responsible people before they're worthy of going on a date.

Would you hold physically disabled people to those same standards or like most people would you make exceptions for them.


Yes.

Do you think that they're unable to improve?

For a lot of them yes. Finding work is harder for them. It’s unrealistic to expect them to improve and succeed the same as a fully able body person.
Can they, do some, yes but not most. Same with mental disorders.
I, quite Frank saddens by your change, now that you’ve got a taste of success you’ve become the people you disliked. You now look down in the rest of us just like other conservatives or republicans of the USA. Glad you were able to pull yourself up by your boot straps but doesn’t mean others can.



Lovemeasme
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2
Location: Florida

02 Nov 2017, 10:45 pm

Why are men so desperate? I have the opposite problem. Must be an aspie thing. I can't stand my man's clingy ways, geez, he seriously would follow me in the bathroom if I didn't shut the door. Then he blames it on me saying i never connect. I should date an aspie...does that work? Or would they both drift apart too easy?



314pe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,013

03 Nov 2017, 12:51 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
105:100 makes actually a lot of male excess on large scale.

Fortunately, for various reasons, men are bad at surviving. Unfortunately, modern medicine is very good.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia

03 Nov 2017, 2:07 am

sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
I guess saying there are more men in the world is now the new excuse for getting nowhere in online dating, instead of “The problem is me”.

There is a man drought in New Zealand. There are significantly more women than men. But guys still can’t get replies on online dating sites.

There is no more chance of being born a male. None. No confirmed and proven data to back that up.

No one is saying biology is fair. Look at lions. One male mates with as many females he wants. Females and males both have their benefits and low points in all species.

But producing straw man arguments for your lack of success is ridiculous.


Then it's a good thing that, a few years ago when I had trouble getting a date I chose self-improvement rather than excuses.

If there was a man who was unemployed, uneducated and never made any attempt to improve himself, I wouldn't blame women for not wanting to date him.

If there was a woman who made no attempt to improve herself, then I wouldn't blamemen for not wanting to date her.

I think members of both sexes have to try to become capable, responsible people before they're worthy of going on a date.

Would you hold physically disabled people to those same standards or like most people would you make exceptions for them.


Yes.

Do you think that they're unable to improve?

For a lot of them yes. Finding work is harder for them. It’s unrealistic to expect them to improve and succeed the same as a fully able body person.
Can they, do some, yes but not most. Same with mental disorders.

No I don't expect them to have the same capabilities as an able-bodied person. What I mean is they can improve compared to how they were before. Each year they can learn new skills and get a little bit more capable. A man in a wheelchair may never walk but what's to stop him from getting a software engineering degree? A man who is mentally disabled will never get a software engineering degree but what's to stop him from becoming more independent, at least in some small way?

The other thing is, while we all have a right to exist, none of us have a right to a girlfriend. What if a man had downs syndrome and women just aren't attracted to his condition. Does he have a right to a long term relationship?

What if this scenario were reversed. Would you date a woman with downs syndrome? We all have different capabilities but we don't all have the right to a partner. No one in the world has that right.


sly279 wrote:
I, quite Frank saddens by your change, now that you’ve got a taste of success you’ve become the people you disliked. You now look down in the rest of us just like other conservatives or republicans of the USA. Glad you were able to pull yourself up by your boot straps but doesn’t mean others can.

Yeah but at least I get to hang with the cool kids now :lol:

It could have easily been you instead of me. Imagine if our positions were reversed. Imagine if you got a high paying job instead of me. Perhaps you'd become like me, perhaps you'd be the one getting a lot of replies on dating sites. Perhaps you'd be the one taking girls out to nice restaurants. Perhaps I'd be the one complaining about how unfair it is. What would you say to me then?


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


Last edited by RetroGamer87 on 03 Nov 2017, 2:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia

03 Nov 2017, 2:20 am

Lovemeasme wrote:
Why are men so desperate? I have the opposite problem. Must be an aspie thing. I can't stand my man's clingy ways, geez, he seriously would follow me in the bathroom if I didn't shut the door. Then he blames it on me saying i never connect. I should date an aspie...does that work? Or would they both drift apart too easy?


Good idea. Aspie men value their alone time just as you do.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

03 Nov 2017, 2:32 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
I guess saying there are more men in the world is now the new excuse for getting nowhere in online dating, instead of “The problem is me”.

There is a man drought in New Zealand. There are significantly more women than men. But guys still can’t get replies on online dating sites.

There is no more chance of being born a male. None. No confirmed and proven data to back that up.

No one is saying biology is fair. Look at lions. One male mates with as many females he wants. Females and males both have their benefits and low points in all species.

But producing straw man arguments for your lack of success is ridiculous.


Then it's a good thing that, a few years ago when I had trouble getting a date I chose self-improvement rather than excuses.

If there was a man who was unemployed, uneducated and never made any attempt to improve himself, I wouldn't blame women for not wanting to date him.

If there was a woman who made no attempt to improve herself, then I wouldn't blamemen for not wanting to date her.

I think members of both sexes have to try to become capable, responsible people before they're worthy of going on a date.

Would you hold physically disabled people to those same standards or like most people would you make exceptions for them.


Yes.

Do you think that they're unable to improve?

For a lot of them yes. Finding work is harder for them. It’s unrealistic to expect them to improve and succeed the same as a fully able body person.
Can they, do some, yes but not most. Same with mental disorders.

No I don't expect them to have the same capabilities as an able-bodied person. What I mean is they can improve compared to how they were before. Each year they can learn new skills and get a little bit more capable. A man in a wheelchair may never walk but what's to stop him from getting a software engineering degree? A man who is mentally disabled will never get a software engineering degree but what's to stop him from becoming more independent, at least in some small way?

The other thing is, while we all have a right to exist, none of us have a right to a girlfriend. What if a man had downs syndrome and women just aren't attracted to his condition. Does he have a right to a long term relationship?

What if this scenario were reversed. Would you date a woman with downs syndrome? We all have different capabilities but we don't all have the right to a partner. No one in the world has that right.


sly279 wrote:
I, quite Frank saddens by your change, now that you’ve got a taste of success you’ve become the people you disliked. You now look down in the rest of us just like other conservatives or republicans of the USA. Glad you were able to pull yourself up by your boot straps but doesn’t mean others can.

Yeah but at least I get to hang with the cool kids now :lol:

It could have easily been you instead of me. Imagine if our positions were reversed. Imagine if you got a high paying job instead of me. Perhaps you'd become like me, perhaps you'd be the one getting a lot of replies on dating sites. Perhaps you'd be the one taking girls out to nice restaurants. Perhaps I'd be the one complaining about how unfair it is. What would you say to me then?

I wouldn’t gloat about it or shame others for their lack of it.
But Yiuve always been superficial i dont know why I epexcted anything else, I don’t see any benefit to further communication between us, farewell.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

03 Nov 2017, 2:33 am

Lovemeasme wrote:
Why are men so desperate? I have the opposite problem. Must be an aspie thing. I can't stand my man's clingy ways, geez, he seriously would follow me in the bathroom if I didn't shut the door. Then he blames it on me saying i never connect. I should date an aspie...does that work? Or would they both drift apart too easy?

Aspies are all different. I’m clingy and aspie. Though I wouldn’t follow a woman to a bathroom. I just like to talk daily. Which makes me clingy



314pe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,013

03 Nov 2017, 2:44 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:
The other thing is, while we all have a right to exist, none of us have a right to a girlfriend. What if a man had downs syndrome and women just aren't attracted to his condition. Does he have a right to a long term relationship?

What if this scenario were reversed. Would you date a woman with downs syndrome? We all have different capabilities but we don't all have the right to a partner. No one in the world has that right.

Everyone is worth being loved and everyone deserves to be loved, but not everybody will be loved.

A man's worth is mostly measured by his success. We guys have to try to achieve what we can.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

03 Nov 2017, 4:30 am

The problem is its harder to be successful today than in the past. Much harder, even for NTs.

Depression in the United States is at an all.time high and obesity too.

Humans have always been highly adaptable, but even NTs are being pushed to their psychological and physical limits.

8,000 years ago the average man had to build shelter for his family. Build hunting weapons and canoe, and go hunting and fishing with the other men daily. Research shows our ancestors "worked" only 15 hours a week.

1,000 years ago your average man was a medieval peasant who worked hard in the fields all day and came home to his wife and kids. He never made much and sometimes went without a meal.to feed his kids, there was no weekend but there was occasions festivals and holidays.

50 years ago a university degree gave you the advantage but wasn't necessary just to get a job. It was for the elite/wealthy.

2017: University degrees cost MORE today than they did back then, but now most people need a degree to get a job.

Housing is more expensive than ever.

Thanks to.inflation everything is more expensive.

Cities are more densely populated so traffic is heavier and there's more people in the city so.now.it tales people hours to drive to and from.work.

Antisocial labor jobs are dying, being replaced by machines and most jobs are becoming more social.

People work.more hours today in the past for less money, since the value of a dollar doesnt go as far as it use to.

Even NTs are barely.surviving modern life as it is and people are surprised when Aspies of all people can't do it?

Public health is horrible right.now, most people are overweight, depend on caffeine and only sleep 4-5 hrs a night.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia

03 Nov 2017, 6:33 am

Outrider wrote:
The problem is its harder to be successful today than in the past. Much harder, even for NTs.

Depression in the United States is at an all.time high and obesity too.

Humans have always been highly adaptable, but even NTs are being pushed to their psychological and physical limits.
Very true. We once thought modern technology would make our lives easier. Theoretically it still can.

It's even worse in China. The Chinese girl I've dating at the moment could tell you some horror stories about being pushed to psychological and physical limits.

Outrider wrote:
1,000 years ago your average man was a medieval peasant who worked hard in the fields all day and came home to his wife and kids. He never made much and sometimes went without a meal.to feed his kids, there was no weekend but there was occasions festivals and holidays.
The bad thing about the middle ages was that if you were born a peasant, you would always be a peasant. There was no social mobility to allow a peasant to become wealthy.

The good thing about the middle ages was that there was no expectation for the peasant to become wealthy. No one told the peasant his poverty was the result of own laziness. It was the result of being born into a peasant family.

Nowadays poor people are told their poverty is their own fault. They're all expected to make themselves wealthy. A few will but it's unrealistic to expect them all to do that.

Especially when only the top few percent can get a certain type of job. No matter how hard they work, it's impossible for 100% of people to fit into the top 5% bracket. That's why I get mad at people for saying the secret of success is to just work harder, because if you need to be above average to get a certain job, if everyone tries harder, it doesn't cause more people to become average, it just raises the average level. It makes it even harder to be above average than it was before.

The Chinese girl I'm dating says her dad made her get a master's degree because everyone in China has a bachelor degree so it's no longer an advantage. Now everyone in China is getting a master's degree. Soon it will no longer be an advantage. I think this will be bad for the economy because it means people don't enter the workforce until they're older and their working years are shorter.

The myth of success is that hard work will guarantee success. It won't guarantee anything when you're competing against people who are trying to work harder than you. You work 10 hours per day, they'll work 12. You respond by working 14 hours per day, they'll respond with 16. This arms race leads nowhere. It just makes it harder to keep up with the average by raising the average.

There are no guarantees in life. The rich will say "I did x and I become successful. They're unaware of the thousands of people who did the exact same thing and didn't succeed. They don't know just how chance based life can be.

The worst thing is that the rich pretend generational poverty isn't a thing. Or they just blame the families without consideration that their successful parents were in a better position to give guidance and advice than unemployed parents would be. Without consideration for what kind of schools poor kids have to go to.

They say the poor get bad grades because they're lazy. That's not the only factor. Psychologists have performed an experiment that when people are worried about money their cognitive performance is impaired and they get worse grades on an exam. So if you're preoccupied with worried thoughts about how you're going to pay the bills during the exam, you might get a bad grade. The rich student sitting next to you isn't worried about money. When he gets an A and you get a C, he'll say it's because you were lazy.

I really think we live in a false meritocracy. The rich just pretend that social mobility is perfect and absolute because they live in "the land of opportunity".


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short