Majority of autistuc men dont have a girlfriend?

Post Reply New Topic

Easy intercourse?!
Did you really just say that?!

I thought your concern with this topic might be to advocate for women who are "kept" by felons.

Well ... considering you weren't even alive fifty years ago yes, a lot has certainly changed.

Some women are very much interested in the healthy upbringing of people.
They often oversee this in their role as doctor, dentist, nurse, therapist, policy maker, etc. just like men.

"I don’t really think that men and women “complement” each other outside of reproduction."
I'm guessing in terms of raising children they complement each other, but not in other ways?

I don't think diversity and more inclusion are good solutions for change. Do people think if a car that runs badly, the solution would be to give it a different coat of paint? I personally think just because something is strongly socialized doesn't mean it automatically makes sense. It doesn't matter who they are but rather can they do the job well. I also believe there's a natural order to things and balance. I agree some changes make sense. At the same time too much change could cause the pendulum to swing other direction; which cause another set of problems.

I wasn’t referring to raising children. I was referring to eggs and sperm. Obviously, a single mother or two mothers can raise a child just like a single father or two fathers can.

I believe in progress, not in adhering to tradition for tradition’s sake.

Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 22 Jul 2024, 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

They don't need to complement each other in terms of raising children.
Ideally, they both just need to show up.

Same-sex couples and single parents can raise children perfectly well without the opposite sex.

You read my mind!

Yeah exactly. I think the failure of completely ignoring the differences between men and women and accepting natural order is the issue. Whenever change is presented, a lot of the times someone else will take the consequences of that change.

What is the natural order of men and women, exactly, and how is it being changed or ignored?

I don't think all Incel groups cause violence. I think the real problem is there's no place to uplift and put men on the correct path in life. Cyberdad made a good point. Incel groups and red pill spaces are the only places for men to go currently because of this. I think economically unreliable men plays a massive role as well.

I differentiate between involuntarily celibate and Incel (the group), but beyond that I didn't say all Incels cause violence. I clearly said that we don't know if they will cause violence until or unless they do. Statistically, they do have a high likelihood though. That's why it's not smart for people to associate themselves with such groups.

So men and women only complement each other through sex and that's it? If that's the case then what are marriages for? I think that idea alone gives men the right to "smash and pass." Also both genders are weak and some things and stronger in others. How does man know how to be a man without a father and vise versa between a woman and her mother?

People can support each other no matter their gender. Marriage doesn’t have to involve a husband and wife. I don’t think people need to learn how to be men and women. They need to learn how to be good human beings. They can learn that with any parent or guardian.

A lot of men may be physically stronger than me, but other than that, my strengths and weaknesses don’t appear to be gender dependent.

Woman are more successful than ever before at the expense of a lot the men falling behind. Education and in any job with air conditioning, women are doing excellent in.

Also men are and will always be known to attractive based on status and resources. Women are usually attractive solely based on existence.

Last edited by Graves Knight on 22 Jul 2024, 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Marriages are because people enjoy being together and want to be together, whether their attraction is from being alike or unlike.

People don't have to fit like puzzle pieces.
They might bond because of similarities.

Also, marriage can be between two people of the same sex just like divorce can.
If there are differences or complements it doesn't have to be related to gender.

What if the man is a quiet unemployed caregiver and the woman is a strong leader in business?
That's still complementary by your description but has nothing to do with traditional gender roles.

What if one likes cooking and one likes cleaning?
Same idea.
It doesn't matter which is which.

What if they both love cooking and cleaning, or both love fighting fires?

I don't really get it.

I think you're assuming most people with ASD are stimulus avoidant, I'm not sure that's actually a good read of the ASD population, in particular when it comes to the ASD+ADHD dual diagnosed population.

I'd also note that you seem quite unfamiliar with the effects of pot if you're assuming smoking pot = party animal stuff. Usually pot tends to mellow people out which seems kinda the opposite of what party animals are after.





Me included.

That I might be a "party animal" relative to you is not the same as being a party animal by the standards of the general populace. Despite rumours to the contrary, I'm not Chad Thundercock; I just lack the impulse control to be entirely socially avoidant, which means due to experience with putting myself out there socially I'm less intimidated by it (and the potential social rejection that often follows) than you are. Rather than flinching from potential social rejection I've learned to learn from it when it occurs.

As for use of substances, pharmacology has always been a special interest, as well a means of self-medicating.

Hold up.
Women's success is at the expense of men?
How, exactly?

Also yes, women do tend to get more education than men.

I'm not sure about the aircon quip.
I know some women who work with HVAC and install or repair AC.
Is that what you mean?