DataSage’s Alpha Male Guide to Meeting Women (JULY UPDATE!!)

Page 25 of 34 [ 540 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 34  Next

Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

13 Oct 2009, 7:07 am

I'm a woman and NT so my response is colored by that but I think these guides are both harmless and mostly useless. I only read the excerpts posted but the main slant seems to be how to say things that won't be off-putting to women so that they will not shut you down and will be at least somewhat intrigued. That's good. That's useful. These guides are likely quite helpful in getting AS and shy NT men into an initial conversation with a woman. But what then? The guides act as scripts and they work as such (especially for AS men who desire a script) because initial conversations between people who don't know each other well often do follow a format. This format is alien to AS men and shy NT men so the guide teaches it. But I suspect the usefulness ends there. Because once that first hour of conversation is over, women will go "off script" as it were and the man who actually needs this guide to know what to say will be suddenly lost. The guide is all about formula and formulaic conversations only work for the first hour or so because women are following a social formula too.

So that's why I think there is a little usefulness in learning how to break the ice but no usefullness after that. ASnd therefore no danger either. Once the ice is broken and the conversation is going and the woman is interested...then what? There is no script. The woman said "yes" to a date and the guide has you believe that she will then have sex with you but it doesn't actually work like that. A true player doesn't need a guide because he can think on his feet and subtly change his style and reactions to match the woman. This is a skill that the guide can't teach because it requires far more than mere knowledge. It requires an exquisite sensitivity to body language, prosody and implications of words- precisely the things that AS men and shy NT men lack because they are so caught up in worrying about how everything they say and do will be taken. So there is no danger to women from wannabe player men who read these guides. There may be some marginal; danger to the men who read the guides and get fooled into thinking women can be counted on to always follow a script and if they just do "A" she will always react with "B". A seasoned player knows that isn't true and can adapt instantaneously. That's how he is able to be a player in the first place- his flexibility in adapting his approach to the specific woman he is trying to seduce.



Stinkypuppy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2006
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,554

13 Oct 2009, 1:17 pm

Janissy wrote:
I'm a woman and NT so my response is colored by that but I think these guides are both harmless and mostly useless. I only read the excerpts posted but the main slant seems to be how to say things that won't be off-putting to women so that they will not shut you down and will be at least somewhat intrigued. That's good. That's useful. These guides are likely quite helpful in getting AS and shy NT men into an initial conversation with a woman. But what then? The guides act as scripts and they work as such (especially for AS men who desire a script) because initial conversations between people who don't know each other well often do follow a format. This format is alien to AS men and shy NT men so the guide teaches it. But I suspect the usefulness ends there. Because once that first hour of conversation is over, women will go "off script" as it were and the man who actually needs this guide to know what to say will be suddenly lost. The guide is all about formula and formulaic conversations only work for the first hour or so because women are following a social formula too.

So that's why I think there is a little usefulness in learning how to break the ice but no usefullness after that. ASnd therefore no danger either. Once the ice is broken and the conversation is going and the woman is interested...then what? There is no script. The woman said "yes" to a date and the guide has you believe that she will then have sex with you but it doesn't actually work like that. A true player doesn't need a guide because he can think on his feet and subtly change his style and reactions to match the woman. This is a skill that the guide can't teach because it requires far more than mere knowledge. It requires an exquisite sensitivity to body language, prosody and implications of words- precisely the things that AS men and shy NT men lack because they are so caught up in worrying about how everything they say and do will be taken. So there is no danger to women from wannabe player men who read these guides. There may be some marginal; danger to the men who read the guides and get fooled into thinking women can be counted on to always follow a script and if they just do "A" she will always react with "B". A seasoned player knows that isn't true and can adapt instantaneously. That's how he is able to be a player in the first place- his flexibility in adapting his approach to the specific woman he is trying to seduce.


Very well said. If an AS guy has to follow a scripted guide like this one to meet women, there are more issues going on with the guy than just a problem meeting women. :roll: Guides like this say, "do this, do that", but are incredibly poor at providing accurate explanations of why a guy should try these things, and do not go into detail what some of the limitations of these approaches are. If a guy must follow a script like this, it reveals some fundamental deficiencies in social skills in general, and the guy is much better off working on those first, than diving in to try to get a girlfriend without rectifying those deficiencies. Resolving those deficiencies will enable the AS guy to go "off-script" much more proficiently and effectively, which is the real solution people should be striving for. I mean, once the AS guy got the girlfriend, what then? If you (as in the general "you", I know Janissy is NT :mrgreen: ) are trying to get NT girlfriends using this guide, are you willing to put up with her NT needs in the long run? Only true social skills and social understanding are going to help you stick it out in the long run. If not, why are you even bothering?


_________________
Won't you help a poor little puppy?


Only_an_egg
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Age: 72
Gender: Female
Posts: 28

19 Oct 2009, 8:39 pm

Hi.

I’m brand new, just got here.

What a wonderful Planet this is, in general. I read the first 2 pages of this thread out of sheer curiosity, then looked to the end, years later!

Stinkypuppy, responding to and amplifying Janissy’s take on it all, observes:

“…I mean, once the AS guy got the girlfriend, what then? If you … are trying to get NT girlfriends using this guide, are you willing to put up with her NT needs in the long run? Only true social skills and social understanding are going to help you stick it out in the long run. If not, why are you even bothering?”

This has such resonances for me. The main reason I’m here is that I’ve been trying to relate to a very bright but sometimes very strange man, for YEARS now. His ways of interacting with me sometimes create very hurt feelings. It has taken me a long time to figure out that he is most likely on the Aspergers spectrum somewhere. I’ve had to cope with what he himself refers to as his “inability to meet my emotional needs.” I’ve felt mistreated at times, when he should by all “normal” standards have done or mostly SAID something that was left undone or unsaid.

There are some strange absences from the advice offered and the portions of the discussion I read.

My social experiences tend to be with those on the extreme right tail of the intelligence curve, where my computer-programming friends and relatives fall. Mensa is full of Little Professors with amazingly bad social skills. Privately, I’ve been used to thinking of aspergers as “Engineer’s Syndrom.” So this question is for those who fall into that category, and I kind of assume that it applies to a majority of posters here, who are so articulate and self-analytical: if you’re so bright, why on earth would you want to fool around ‘courting’ women who are so normal that they are your intellectual inferiors by tens of IQ points? I mean, someone with an IQ of 130 trying to date someone with an IQ of 100 makes as much sense as a “normal” looking to date someone with an IQ of 70.

Where’s the joy in that? You are going to talk about what together? (Once you’re finished with all that, presumably, torrid sex.) Shouldn’t you be thinking about trying to find the few special women who are bright enough to be interesting to you???

If not – and this is all about animal (alpha-animal!) sexuality, then my advice is go and build up your body! Go to the gym and get all “hot” looking. If we women are all instinct-driven unconsciously falling for men who look right in the first 5 seconds, for goodness sake, develop those pectorals! We say no but we’ll mean yes when you impress us with your masculinity! Wow. Go get masculin. Let us smell your pheromones….

Back to intelligent conversation – that’s a lot of what my strange friend and I have in common. We share a lot of intellectual and cultural interests. We can do things together that we both enjoy, like concerts and plays, and discuss them afterwards. There is a healthy function to dates like this; they offer plenty of structure and offer an armiture for conversation. He uses these structured evenings as a prelude to physical contact. A lot of the time these evenings work quite well, despite the bizarre (abrupt, for me) transition between conversation and sexuality.

Lets look back at the first page of advice:

“See dating as a circle. … If a girl leaves the circle on her own accord, you must realize that she left for the exact reason every girl leaves every guy (REGARDLESS of the situation): she expected something that you could not give her, and that is not your problem, it’s hers.”

That’s haunting for me. My friend always seems to have a passive attitude about his “not meeting my emotional needs.” Its as if it were somehow unthinkable to even try to meet them. If he were to compromise with me, it would be very helpful. If he were to TRY, it would be wonderful. There’s this same fatalism here. It’s not your problem, it’s hers.

(Look, an actual relationship is like a potluck dinner. Everybody brings something, and everybody is nourished. If you show up but don’t bring anything, don’t wonder why the dinner is not as lavish as you’d hoped.)

Anyway, the girl or woman who will actually accept you as you are -- and who will maintain your interest in her -- will be in your league in terms of intelligence. She will have to have a big heart to accommodate you. If anything she will need to be VERY empathic to understand your needs and limitations, as they will be so different from yours.

On top of that, she will need to be an “alpha” female to cope with your less-than-optimal emotional support. No teary emotional weaklings. Don’t try to out-alpha her!

Find a woman you can actually talk to, and allow her to get to know who you truly are.



Klom
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 67

26 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm

Veresae wrote:
Thanks for this. Though, I'm someone who IS very needy, and ISN'T confident, and can't HELP but wonder if someone likes me or not because I don't want to be an as*hole and bother them, and act to them how girls I didn't like at all have acted towards me in the past.

I dunno, I'd rather not act like someone I'm not. It just seems...dishonest. But if it's the only way I can even possibly have a relationship...


You ARE needy because your putting too much value into each conversation you have with girls. You can HELP wondering if someone likes you or not.

A really crucial quote from one of David Deangelo's guests was "Pity is a drug.". Self-pity included! It's addictive and makes you go into a downward spiral. Go to the callendar of your cell phone and type "Self-pity is a drug" so that you remember this! People will feel empathy, try to make you feel better and most importantly feel bad themselves and run away!

Don't make excuses. Don't feel self-pity. Do go out and make female friends. This was a big thing for me! When I went from trying to get a girl to like me to trying to have a good time and make friends, my success with women sky rocketed. I also got to know some of my very best friends!

Why? I got confidence. I could go talk to females and feel confident. I wasn't treating her like the prize for running my pit-fall marathon of praising her. I found the short way around.



Klom
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 67

26 Nov 2009, 1:40 pm

Only_an_egg wrote:
Hi.

I’m brand new, just got here.

What a wonderful Planet this is, in general. I read the first 2 pages of this thread out of sheer curiosity, then looked to the end, years later!

Stinkypuppy, responding to and amplifying Janissy’s take on it all, observes:

“…I mean, once the AS guy got the girlfriend, what then? If you … are trying to get NT girlfriends using this guide, are you willing to put up with her NT needs in the long run? Only true social skills and social understanding are going to help you stick it out in the long run. If not, why are you even bothering?”

This has such resonances for me. The main reason I’m here is that I’ve been trying to relate to a very bright but sometimes very strange man, for YEARS now. His ways of interacting with me sometimes create very hurt feelings. It has taken me a long time to figure out that he is most likely on the Aspergers spectrum somewhere. I’ve had to cope with what he himself refers to as his “inability to meet my emotional needs.” I’ve felt mistreated at times, when he should by all “normal” standards have done or mostly SAID something that was left undone or unsaid.

There are some strange absences from the advice offered and the portions of the discussion I read.

My social experiences tend to be with those on the extreme right tail of the intelligence curve, where my computer-programming friends and relatives fall. Mensa is full of Little Professors with amazingly bad social skills. Privately, I’ve been used to thinking of aspergers as “Engineer’s Syndrom.” So this question is for those who fall into that category, and I kind of assume that it applies to a majority of posters here, who are so articulate and self-analytical: if you’re so bright, why on earth would you want to fool around ‘courting’ women who are so normal that they are your intellectual inferiors by tens of IQ points? I mean, someone with an IQ of 130 trying to date someone with an IQ of 100 makes as much sense as a “normal” looking to date someone with an IQ of 70.

Where’s the joy in that? You are going to talk about what together? (Once you’re finished with all that, presumably, torrid sex.) Shouldn’t you be thinking about trying to find the few special women who are bright enough to be interesting to you???

If not – and this is all about animal (alpha-animal!) sexuality, then my advice is go and build up your body! Go to the gym and get all “hot” looking. If we women are all instinct-driven unconsciously falling for men who look right in the first 5 seconds, for goodness sake, develop those pectorals! We say no but we’ll mean yes when you impress us with your masculinity! Wow. Go get masculin. Let us smell your pheromones….

Back to intelligent conversation – that’s a lot of what my strange friend and I have in common. We share a lot of intellectual and cultural interests. We can do things together that we both enjoy, like concerts and plays, and discuss them afterwards. There is a healthy function to dates like this; they offer plenty of structure and offer an armiture for conversation. He uses these structured evenings as a prelude to physical contact. A lot of the time these evenings work quite well, despite the bizarre (abrupt, for me) transition between conversation and sexuality.

Lets look back at the first page of advice:

“See dating as a circle. … If a girl leaves the circle on her own accord, you must realize that she left for the exact reason every girl leaves every guy (REGARDLESS of the situation): she expected something that you could not give her, and that is not your problem, it’s hers.”

That’s haunting for me. My friend always seems to have a passive attitude about his “not meeting my emotional needs.” Its as if it were somehow unthinkable to even try to meet them. If he were to compromise with me, it would be very helpful. If he were to TRY, it would be wonderful. There’s this same fatalism here. It’s not your problem, it’s hers.

(Look, an actual relationship is like a potluck dinner. Everybody brings something, and everybody is nourished. If you show up but don’t bring anything, don’t wonder why the dinner is not as lavish as you’d hoped.)

Anyway, the girl or woman who will actually accept you as you are -- and who will maintain your interest in her -- will be in your league in terms of intelligence. She will have to have a big heart to accommodate you. If anything she will need to be VERY empathic to understand your needs and limitations, as they will be so different from yours.

On top of that, she will need to be an “alpha” female to cope with your less-than-optimal emotional support. No teary emotional weaklings. Don’t try to out-alpha her!

Find a woman you can actually talk to, and allow her to get to know who you truly are.


I have the problem that I unintentionally hurt girls without noticing. Be attentive and try to pick up on what topics specific girls are sensitive about.

Only_An_Egg: I understand what you mean, and I agree to a large extent. But I don't know if you've ever tried to find partners that are among the 1% smartest of the population, phsically attractive that you can have a good time around. But it can be difficult. Just finding the tone with girls that aren't that scarce is easier. And you don't lose your head to the attraction you feel.



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

26 Dec 2009, 6:35 am

I think DataDage's guide makes a lot of sense. A lot of it is pitched above the level I tend to function at but it makes interesting reading.

I can actually make passable conversations with women if they speak to me first. This happens occasionally. I don't have the confidence to approach women - I just don't know what to say to get them to talk back to me. I am very concious of my Autism as a communication impairment and I constanly wonder how I appear to other people - especially women.

DataSage mentioned something about being careful not to wind up as just friends with a women I am interested in. How do I do that? How do I indicate to a woman that I like her? What is being too forward as opposed to not being forward enough?

Very confusing.


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

26 Dec 2009, 3:56 pm

gsilver wrote:
I think this shallow alpha male bull**** is a big part of the reason why so many aspies remain alone.

Alpha male acting routine = dishonesty
Real relationships require honesty and strong emotional connections built from it to sustain.


One thing I learnt is that women are turned off by insecure men and turned on by very self-confident men. I see no problem with pretending to be self-confident if you actually aren't when a girlfriend may in fact give you that self-confidence you need....



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

27 Dec 2009, 2:58 pm

Salonfilosoof wrote:
One thing I learnt is that women are turned off by insecure men and turned on by very self-confident men. I see no problem with pretending to be self-confident if you actually aren't when a girlfriend may in fact give you that self-confidence you need....


Basically any on-line pick-up guide will agree with this but I have two practical objections......
a) People (including women) need to understand that anyone with a handicap is going to have insecurities. How many people with some form of impairment never ask themselves, "Am I as good as everyone else?". Not many I bet and this is normal because as a handicapped person, I can only see the world from my own perpective. One of the reasons I get along quite well with other men (albeit at a superficial level) is that as men, we look at WHY someone is the way they are and not just WHAT people are. I am sure most guys realise I am lacking in confidence yet they treat me with respect because I have made a life for myself despite my impairment. I have worked hard to become educated, hold down a job and I constantly improve myself at the gym. Men respect these things. Women unfortunately only look at the exterior, superficial things and ignore what a men is really like. Basically, my experience is that being handicapped excludes a man from being worthy - in the eyes of a woman - regardless of anything else.
b) Women ARE turned on by very self-confident men - I agree. However, I must say that very self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap. I do not wish to be like this.


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

27 Dec 2009, 6:03 pm

AspiRob wrote:
[b) Women ARE turned on by very self-confident men - I agree. However, I must say that very self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap. I do not wish to be like this.


Your belief that self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap is incorrect. If you can let this belief go, you will have more success with women.



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

27 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm

Janissy wrote:
Your belief that self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap is incorrect. If you can let this belief go, you will have more success with women.


Thanks for your input but I disagree - not based on opinion but rather on observation.

Regardless of confidence, men who are handicapped in any way usually don't get a second glance from women. Women are just too shallow to see the man who has the handicap.


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

28 Dec 2009, 9:03 am

AspiRob wrote:
Men respect these things. Women unfortunately only look at the exterior, superficial things and ignore what a men is really like. Basically, my experience is that being handicapped excludes a man from being worthy - in the eyes of a woman - regardless of anything else.


I know I'm now getting all the feminists foaming in the mouth, but I've always found most women to be far more superficial than men. I've met some women who are quite "deep" (in a philosophical way), but even the "deepest" woman I've met doesn't even come close to the "deepest" man I've met. I know the word "deep" sound quite ackward in that context, but I couldn't come up with a better term.

AspiRob wrote:
b) Women ARE turned on by very self-confident men - I agree. However, I must say that very self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap. I do not wish to be like this.


True. However, I fear we've got no other option if we want to be taken seriously. If we manage to find a girl and we aren't confident enough, most will just walk all over us....

AspiRob wrote:
Janissy wrote:
Your belief that self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap is incorrect. If you can let this belief go, you will have more success with women.


Thanks for your input but I disagree - not based on opinion but rather on observation.


It matches my observations as well. The greatest jerks tend to be the most self-confident men and also tend to most easily find themselves a suitable girl/woman. In fact, the first few years of high school it seems the greatest ***holes are the only ones who get a girlfriend.



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

31 Dec 2009, 1:58 am

Salonfilosoof wrote:
I know I'm now getting all the feminists foaming in the mouth, but I've always found most women to be far more superficial than men. I've met some women who are quite "deep" (in a philosophical way), but even the "deepest" woman I've met doesn't even come close to the "deepest" man I've met. I know the word "deep" sound quite ackward in that context, but I couldn't come up with a better term.


I know what you are getting at with the word "deep". I use the same word to explain the opposite of shallow in the emotional and general psychological sense. I have been thinking on this one for a bit. Your argument would certainly explain why handicapped women in general don't have much trouble finding a partner but very few handicapped men ever do.

AspiRob wrote:
Janissy wrote:
Your belief that self-confident men are usually jerks who treat women like crap is incorrect. If you can let this belief go, you will have more success with women.


Thanks for your input but I disagree - not based on opinion but rather on observation.


Salonfilosoof wrote:
It matches my observations as well. The greatest jerks tend to be the most self-confident men and also tend to most easily find themselves a suitable girl/woman. In fact, the first few years of high school it seems the greatest ***holes are the only ones who get a girlfriend.


What is the female obsession with confidence, anyway? As I have said in another thread, confidence is not the be all, end all definition of human worth. I know plenty of people (men and women) who are supremely self-confident despite being near idiots - it's called self delusion. I have also met many greatly talented people who (for whatever reason) don't have a lot of self-belief despite having great achievements. Given the choice, I would always take the latter over the former.

I have also observed that the most confident people in the world (again, both men and women) are usually people who have never faced adversity in life. By this I mean people who through pure good luck, have had everthing in life handed to them on a silver platter. How could one not be confident if all goes well for them?

Again, as I have said in another thread, it is unreasonable for anyone (male or female) to expect a handicapped person not to have some hang-ups about their disability. I certainly have and I don't see that as being a weakness. I see it as being an awareness of my limitations. I am equally aware of my talents and abilities. Whilst I am very confident in the things I can do very well (which is actually quite a few things), I am also - for better or worse - aware of my deficits. It is being judged by women wholly on my deficits that gets me angry. To me, this is just another example of how shallow most women are.

I am starting to get angry now so I am going to leave this thread and look at another one.


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

31 Dec 2009, 4:53 am

AspiRob wrote:
I know what you are getting at with the word "deep". I use the same word to explain the opposite of shallow in the emotional and general psychological sense.


The word is not so uncommon within that context, but "a deep woman" just sounds so totally wrong.

AspiRob wrote:
What is the female obsession with confidence, anyway? As I have said in another thread, confidence is not the be all, end all definition of human worth. I know plenty of people (men and women) who are supremely self-confident despite being near idiots - it's called self delusion. I have also met many greatly talented people who (for whatever reason) don't have a lot of self-belief despite having great achievements. Given the choice, I would always take the latter over the former.

I have also observed that the most confident people in the world (again, both men and women) are usually people who have never faced adversity in life. By this I mean people who through pure good luck, have had everthing in life handed to them on a silver platter. How could one not be confident if all goes well for them?


It's probably evolutionary. Back in our deep past, the most confident men were probably also the ones who had least to fear not to come home with a deer on their shoulders. As such, confidence in oneself was probably equivalent to ability to provide for the family.

Today this is of course far from true, but since women rely more on their intuition/instinct than men it seems like women have more than men the tendency to fall for the same type of guy their female ancestors fell for many thousands of years ago.

AspiRob wrote:
Again, as I have said in another thread, it is unreasonable for anyone (male or female) to expect a handicapped person not to have some hang-ups about their disability. I certainly have and I don't see that as being a weakness.


I don't consider my Asperger's as a handicap but rather as a different way of processing information. Although it makes it harder for me to do simple household shores, to prioritize and to get through most social interactions without people thinking I'm a weirdo, I can more or less live on my own and take care of my own life. I don't see why I should see myself as any more handicapped than homosexuals or people with other social deviances.

AspiRob wrote:
It is being judged by women wholly on my deficits that gets me angry. To me, this is just another example of how shallow most women are.


I can't disagree with you here.

One thing I noticed is that it doesn't even matter whether they know about the cause of your deficits. If they don't know you have Asperger's, they just think you're rude and lazy and demand you grow out of it. If they do know you have Asperger's, they just say you're using the Asperger's as an excuse and that no woman would ever be willing to live with you if you don't grow out of it anyway...... So it doesn't really change anything at all.

Oh, and it's not just my exes who say that I can only find the right kind of woman if I continue to perfect myself according to the neurotypical mold. My lesbian friends say so as well. I guess it really is a general female thing....



DataSage
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 114
Location: Florida

02 Jan 2010, 9:37 pm

Oy, it's been years since I wrote my guide, but I can still say I'm sticking to it. My game has improved significantly, though. I could add more to this guide, but I feel my efforts are always in vain on here--I dunno. Glad to see people are still taking from it and discussing its merits.

I get a lot of PMs from people here and the majority of it is positive. I'd say the ratio is 3-1 in favor, but those who do not approve are particularly nasty, in a very aspie sort of way. I'm beginning to realize, I've changed so much, gone through such a radical transformation over the past eight years or so, that my AS really isn't affecting me at all anymore. I mean, it is, don't get me wrong, but socially I'm just so much better off than I was even in 2006 (feels like ages ago).

For those who are interested, I just got done reading a fascinating book--it is not pickup related, just more generally geared towards self-improvement. It's called The Way of the Superior Man: A Spiritual Guide to Mastering the Challenges of Women, Work and Sexual Desire by David Deida, and it is a MASTERPIECE. It has helped me more than any PUA stuff has, and I'm a better man for it. Regardless, I'm still using a lot of David D/Mystery/Tyler Durden techniques, but as far as relationships and sex go, Deida is the man. I highly recommend it to all men in this thread.

Quote:
What is the female obsession with confidence, anyway? As I have said in another thread, confidence is not the be all, end all definition of human worth. I know plenty of people (men and women) who are supremely self-confident despite being near idiots - it's called self delusion. I have also met many greatly talented people who (for whatever reason) don't have a lot of self-belief despite having great achievements. Given the choice, I would always take the latter over the former.


The female "obsession" you speak of is not an obsession at all, it is an instinct that is hardwired into women for finding suitable mates. This is much like how men are hardwired into being attracted to scents from women--not necessarily smells, but scents.

But yes, I agree, there are a lot of idiots who are self-confident. This does not make the person who IS confident an idiot, however. It's a matter of balance and self initiative that makes the difference in this case.

Quote:
I don't consider my Asperger's as a handicap but rather as a different way of processing information.


I really like this quote. It exemplifies a superb outlook that every aspie should strive for, in some form or another.



Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

03 Jan 2010, 6:23 am

DataSage wrote:
For those who are interested, I just got done reading a fascinating book--it is not pickup related, just more generally geared towards self-improvement. It's called The Way of the Superior Man: A Spiritual Guide to Mastering the Challenges of Women, Work and Sexual Desire by David Deida, and it is a MASTERPIECE. It has helped me more than any PUA stuff has, and I'm a better man for it. Regardless, I'm still using a lot of David D/Mystery/Tyler Durden techniques, but as far as relationships and sex go, Deida is the man. I highly recommend it to all men in this thread.


You you elaborate on some of your David D/Mystery/Tyler Durden techniques? As much as I try, I thusfar always fail at it. Even if they first think I'm all cool and mysterious, as they get to know me better I cannot uphold that appearance and the real me just doesn't seem appealing enough to keep their attention even when the sex is fantastic for them (you'd think good sex will make them appreciate your manliness more, but nooooo) :?



Rocker82
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 64

03 Jan 2010, 12:00 pm

I don't buy into any of this alpha male crap,were not in primitive times.The only alpha male out are chimpanzees!