so if you didn't feel like you had to get a girl....
I have never seen a man switching that fast.
that's a different situation; she found someone else and dumped the guy. I'm talking about what happens after divorce, and yeah, I'm assuming there's not an affair involved. On OKC it's like a minefield with those guys -- they're in wacked-out emotional shape but trying to look all cool and ready for Life Part Whatever. They're not.
She said: "Yesterday".
![Shocked 8O](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
I'm not saying it never happens, Boo. I'm saying it's more often men than women who find it necessary to leap back in, to the point of cliche.
Yes, and I've acknowledged this, and asked followup questions, which have been graciously answered. Several posters have also commented on the validity of the idea in their own lives, which means (given tiny sample) that the original idea isn't nothing, it just isn't all there is.
I never said that social pressure is the only reason to pursue romance. I think you need to slow down and read more carefully.
The thing that's interesting to me, and the thing this thread is about (again, go back, reread) is patterns of approaching potential partners when looking for romance. Rejection on initial asking-out, and how-to-ask-out, questions/comments/complaints/lamentations are far more common amongst men than women, and not just here. And that rejection is the source of a tremendous amount of unhappiness and ambivalence about, also outright anger at, women. The usual trope -- advanced by men as a reason why they have to go through this, though it's rejected here and elsewhere often by women -- is that women expect men to do the asking and won't make the first move, leaving that responsibility to men.There's also another chronic theme that bubbles through, which is to do with not having a mate when everyone else has one, and feeling socially inadequate because of it. Put them together and the message appears to be, "Men, if you don't have a girlfriend it's your own fault, because it's on you to make the first move: go ask." And the more social pressure there is to have a girlfriend -- the more intense the feeling of social inadequacy at not having a girlfriend -- the more intense that pressure.
However. This doesn't mean that other incentives to pair off don't exist, which is why I asked the question as I did: if that particular pressure didn't exist, would your behavior change. Some people have replied saying "that pressure doesn't exist for me anyway", while others have said it does, and a few have said that their behavior would change.
Why am I asking these questions? Because it seems to me that if a combination of pressures is leading men to approach women at a much higher rate than women approach men, it could make sense that men feel more bruised by rejection than women do. In which case the question is 'is it possible to relieve some of the pressures that push men to stick their hands in the fan all the time'.
Several people here have said "it doesn't matter, women face the same pressures". But I don't think that's true, and I think that's reflected in how anxious men are to ask women out v. women asking men. As I've said elsewhere, and other women have echoed, the bar for my interest is pretty high. A guy not only has to be attractive, but look like a good potential longterm partner for me, and there aren't many of those. So while I have no problem asking men out (I've never met a grown woman who's shy about that), there just aren't many I do ask out. As for other women's pressures to find men, I've described populations of women who just...aren't that driven to do it, not because they're asexual or celibate, but because they don't think it's a good use of their time right now.
I think patterns after separation and divorce also bear out the idea that there's more pressures on men to couple up than on women. If you look at dating sites, you'll find tons of guys who're there either in expectation of or just-post-breakup. Get back in that saddle, etc. The same is not so true of women, particularly single dads v. single moms. Women often take years to begin dating again. Not because they're scarred by men, but because it's more important to them to pull their lives back together and heal -- and, in the case of moms, set things up practically and help their kids through the divorce aftermath -- than it is to go find a new partner. What I've seen over the last decade or so is that the men are much more pressed to jump back in. Large studies of how men and women fare post-divorce also support it: women's quality of life tends to rise, and they're happier, while mens' tends to plummet. The men seem to need the relationships more than the women do.
How much of that's to do with social pressures? I don't know. That's why I asked.
You've just made this post interesting enough or me to jump in. I'm not going to sit here and claim there is a tremendous amount of social pressure for me to find a woman and have a stable relationship with her, at least not socially. Don't get me wrong, it's there, but for some reason my masculinity isn't challenged by other men. Part of that I think is I'm a very large man, so I'm somewhat deemed as intimidating even though I'm relatively gentle. I've also found that as I get older, the pressure is less so for me. I'm treated more like a respectable member of society. Young boys and girls will go out of there way to smile at me, or say hi to me, or wave to me. Clearly there is a natural attraction to my masculinity, a feeling of being safe, and also that of a father figure, all rolled into one. The most telling sign is that women are not compelled to feel protective of their children, "Don't go up to that strange man and say hi to him." For some reason I'm not viewed as a threat.
Now mind you, I'm a single man, but I did not divorce, I'm a widower. But it's not like that's written on my forehead, and I don't go around advertising it, "My wife is dead, feel sorry for me, nurture me." I guess what I'm trying to say is simply that I don't feel a lot of social pressure to find a woman, at least not directly. Clearly I find it in advertising, and in indirect ways, but it's almost nonexistent directly. I think men who might challenge me with respect to my finding a woman sense it would go something like this, "So, man, I need to ask, what's up with you not having a woman? It doesn't seem normal to me." "What's it to you?" "Well, I'm just wondering what kind of a man you are." "Shut up, I respect actions and not words. You get the first punch. I'm not joking around either." Okay, so I'll admit that comes across as defensive and even unconfident, but quite frankly, I am defensive and unconfident, and mainly I can afford to be.
On the other hand, I feel pressure to provide more of a family for my son. Can a single Asperger's dad raise a son? While I'm doing a good job, love him dearly, and provide him with everything I can, I feel like as he gets older my limitations will become more apparent. So I feel I have pressure to find him a mommy. I'm very affectionate with him, I tell him I'm proud of him and remind him that I love him all the time. When he's sick I'll play the "mommy" role and nurture him, but I can't help but feel there's no way I can be as good as a female at this role. I'd expect a woman to be more sensitive and understanding, and provide observations I can't.
So yeah, I feel like there's pressure for me to find a woman. But mainly I feel that pressure is from the fact that women have legitimate capabilities and roles in a family that can't be replaced by a man. Women have value, they have advantages, they complete a family.
Obviously there are pressures for *me* to have a relationship with a woman as well. I'm not just looking for mommy, I'm looking for lover and friend. I'm looking for support, and or somebody to support. I'm looking for more flexibility, and also frankly the assurance that if I die in a car crash there is somebody who can care for my son, who my son loves and adores.
So ladies, no pressure. It's not like I'm asking for a lot here.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=36785_1578571549.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,120
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
She said: "Yesterday".
![Shocked 8O](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
I'm not saying it never happens, Boo. I'm saying it's more often men than women who find it necessary to leap back in, to the point of cliche.
In fact, half of the dates I had through okc had long relationships and didn't break up long ago, one of them was for 6 years, she returned to the dating scene after a year but even during that year him kept trying to win her back and second chances were granted.
The Yesterday girl was the fastest tho; I had to check her eyes and I was like "Are you feeling ok now?" - yes she was totally ok and smiling too lol. In fact she wanted having sex with me the next week (she reserved a room for that) and when I told her this is too fast she took it personal and very badly.
Boo, I've learned in my experience that it's not worth it to get involved with girls that aren't over their exes yet. I'm always fighting with them, and expectations and needs are simply too hard to meet. Sex also happens way too quickly as well.
_________________
Your Aspie score: 130 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 88 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
Vast majority of cases as well, the girl is likely to be reminded of the ex in one way or another.
Still not as dangerous as a cheating spouse/girlfriend. There is no guarantee that getting in a situation like that won't come back to haunt me.
_________________
Your Aspie score: 130 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 88 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=36785_1578571549.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,120
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
You've just made this post interesting enough or me to jump in. I'm not going to sit here and claim there is a tremendous amount of social pressure for me to find a woman and have a stable relationship with her, at least not socially. Don't get me wrong, it's there, but for some reason my masculinity isn't challenged by other men. Part of that I think is I'm a very large man, so I'm somewhat deemed as intimidating even though I'm relatively gentle. I've also found that as I get older, the pressure is less so for me. I'm treated more like a respectable member of society. Young boys and girls will go out of there way to smile at me, or say hi to me, or wave to me. Clearly there is a natural attraction to my masculinity, a feeling of being safe, and also that of a father figure, all rolled into one. The most telling sign is that women are not compelled to feel protective of their children, "Don't go up to that strange man and say hi to him." For some reason I'm not viewed as a threat.
Now mind you, I'm a single man, but I did not divorce, I'm a widower. But it's not like that's written on my forehead, and I don't go around advertising it, "My wife is dead, feel sorry for me, nurture me." I guess what I'm trying to say is simply that I don't feel a lot of social pressure to find a woman, at least not directly. Clearly I find it in advertising, and in indirect ways, but it's almost nonexistent directly. I think men who might challenge me with respect to my finding a woman sense it would go something like this, "So, man, I need to ask, what's up with you not having a woman? It doesn't seem normal to me." "What's it to you?" "Well, I'm just wondering what kind of a man you are." "Shut up, I respect actions and not words. You get the first punch. I'm not joking around either." Okay, so I'll admit that comes across as defensive and even unconfident, but quite frankly, I am defensive and unconfident, and mainly I can afford to be.
On the other hand, I feel pressure to provide more of a family for my son. Can a single Asperger's dad raise a son? While I'm doing a good job, love him dearly, and provide him with everything I can, I feel like as he gets older my limitations will become more apparent. So I feel I have pressure to find him a mommy. I'm very affectionate with him, I tell him I'm proud of him and remind him that I love him all the time. When he's sick I'll play the "mommy" role and nurture him, but I can't help but feel there's no way I can be as good as a female at this role. I'd expect a woman to be more sensitive and understanding, and provide observations I can't.
So yeah, I feel like there's pressure for me to find a woman. But mainly I feel that pressure is from the fact that women have legitimate capabilities and roles in a family that can't be replaced by a man. Women have value, they have advantages, they complete a family.
Obviously there are pressures for *me* to have a relationship with a woman as well. I'm not just looking for mommy, I'm looking for lover and friend. I'm looking for support, and or somebody to support. I'm looking for more flexibility, and also frankly the assurance that if I die in a car crash there is somebody who can care for my son, who my son loves and adores.
So ladies, no pressure. It's not like I'm asking for a lot here.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
BG, I'm guessing you come across as a rock-solid daddy. I'm sorry about the loss of your wife.
The pressure to have a nurturing mom-figure in your son's life...I get that, but it's a tall order, and a lot of pressure on a woman, especially when the mom is gone. I've met guys in similar positions, and the feeling I got was that I was being interviewed for Mom II -- which wasn't great, because while I recognize that a man's children are part of the package, I'm not primarily looking to become someone else's mom, or a guy's idea of what his son's mom should be. The men just came across quite urgently. Are there any community or social groups, church groups, anything you might belong to where there are nurturing women who might be interested in being there for your son, like an auntie? That might take the pressure off considerably. I've yet to meet a woman like that who didn't like having her advice asked and helping out a bit. People will also pull together and help support a family like yours. That can give you space to really meet the right person. And you do have to be especially careful, because you don't want your son to get attached to someone who disappears because you've broken up. You really need someone who's very serious about her commitments.
I think in reality, too, a lot of one-parent families go along like that -- the right person may not come along for the parent for quite a while, but there's this community, a number of people who are constants in the children's lives, and the parent doesn't feel he or she is doing this entirely alone.
The other thing is...I think there's a lot of pressure on single parents to have a man and a woman, animals-two-by-two, there to serve as role models. Certainly it's something I worried about. My experience has been that it's unwarranted, the fear that somehow you'll screw the kids up if that's not there. I might feel different about it if I had a son, but the lesbian couples I know with sons seem to do fine, their boys seem just as boy as the rest of the boys, and it's not like having two moms renders all men invisble. Anyway, I'm not sure that this is a kind of social pressure that really drives many single parents to find partners, but it certainly can make you feel bad unnecessarily. I don't feel we're incomplete as a family without a man here, but I certainly felt pressure to feel that way early on.
eta: Oh, also -- as the kids get older, *all* our limitations get more apparent. We turn into right idiots. I mean way bumbling. I speak from the cusp of adolescence.
![Shocked 8O](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=36785_1578571549.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,120
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
BG, have you tried to date single moms? They might be more understanding to your situation and are already moms, so the mom role idea wouldn't freak them as much; nor it would scare you to become a dad figure for her child.
And I guess there are more single moms than single dads, more options for you.
And I guess there are more single moms than single dads, more options for you.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
She's never been a mom to a child whose mom has died.
Kids are often less excited about blended families and stepparents than the adults are. Discounting that ("they'll get used to it") is a mistake.
The woman's kids have their "real mom" as well as, likely, a dad still in the picture. That has to be negotiated carefully. These issues aren't just about children's perceptions -- stepparents with children have to balance their own children's needs against the needs of the partner's children. While the manifesto may be "all the kids are equal", if one kid needs a lot more, the stepparent has to think about whether this marriage is really being good for his or her kids.
Dating a family is much trickier than dating a single person.
Single moms tend to have much less time for dating than other women do.
Single moms generally come with exes who're often threatened by the presence of a new man in their children's lives. Again, needs careful negotiation.
One thing I haven't heard, BG - how does your son feel about it? Does he want a new mommy, or is he content with how things are? (You do have to adjust for age and maturity in these things...my kid wanted me to marry, when she was four, so that she could be a flower girl. Then she wanted me to marry so she could have a little sister. Then she wanted me to marry a doctor so we'd be rich and I could volunteer in her classroom. (!) Then she decided that realistically, another kid in the house could be a real pain, and so could a man, and ugh, just leave things as they are. Then she decided my taste in men was pants and that I should definitely leave well enough alone.
Let me see if I can explain it using an analogy with a less charged subject matter than rape.
We can all appreciate that bad driving skills are more likely to cause wrecks, loss, heartbreak, and legal trouble. So imagine that there's a guy who takes this fact to heart and insists that women shouldn't be allowed to drive. He cites cases where women were responsible for bad driving, legal trouble, all that, and claims that the only way to avoid women wrecking is to keep women from driving. He may or may not believe men should be allowed to drive, but he directs his argument towards women. He may even believe that some women are capable of safer driving, but he insists that the consequences of wrecking far outweigh the consequences of arriving at your destination safely.
Now, some women confront this guy and say that, sure, there's always a risk of wrecking, but the women say they have methods and experience that keep them safe (or at least safer), like looking over their shoulder instead of relying on the rear-view mirrors (which have a blind spot), or turning their phone or music off before driving so they are not distracted. Despite their protests, the guy still insists that women shouldn't be driving because it's nonetheless a fact that bad driving increases the likelihood of wrecking. In short, he's dismissing the women's experience as irrelevant, pointing instead to cases where women were at fault in wrecks. He's so focused on that point that he dismisses the fact that more experienced drivers have less chance of wrecking, or at least it being their fault.
Have I made it clearer why your argument is inappropriate and offensive?
_________________
"If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is."
~~ John von Neumann
Well... you've clarified your lack of understanding of the problem.
The conversation was with a particular man who insisted he had super-duper mindreading powers, and that social rules should be geared to these magic powers of his. It wasn't directed at men, the group, specifically. The "directed at men" is your own overlay. If you ask (and some people have), I'll happily say that everyone should ask verbally before touching someone else sexually, except in the context of a stable relationship where you guys have already worked these things out.
And I've said that before, too.
If you want to go on telling yourself that this is all about blaming men, you're welcome to. You'll just be wrong.
As for driving -- you know what? As someone who was a pilot before she was a driver, I feel entirely confident in saying that most people drive like crap and shouldn't be on the road, apart from which it's a miserable practice environmentally. I'd be quite happy with a system of pro drivers, licensed recreational drivers on regulated racetracks, much more public transit, bikeable/walkable towns, and liberation from the expense of car-owning.
Crap pilots get weeded out much more effectively than crap drivers do.
In your analogy, btw, if you want to extend it to the conversation that's gone on, suppose that the women start crying sexism, so the guy says, "Oh. And men. Men shouldn't drive either." And then some men show up and say, "Yeah, we'll go with that." I don't think I've heard any women here defending to the death the right to get sexually aggressive in response to nonverbal signals from a date. Not saying none exist, but it seems to be a non-issue for women here, the asking bit.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=36785_1578571549.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,120
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The guy in my analogy isn't blaming women, he's insisting that the consequences of wrecking are worse than the consequences of getting to your destination while ignoring their experience or personal safety precautions.
Our conversation, or Max Temkin?
Really? Let's delve back into the archives and pull up your post on page 5 of 'I misread a situation and kiss a friend' thread, seen here http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf261300-0-60.html:
Directed at men? So it would seem. Let's look for another... ah, here, on page 9 http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf261300-0-120.html:
And here, same post:
And here, after I asked if you some men are good at reading non-verbal cues, page 10 http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf261300-0-135.html:
Here you bring up rape statistics while talking about men who prefer spontaneous romance, suggesting you don't or can't distinguish between the two, similar to how the guy in my analogy is not distinguishing between good and bad women drivers:
Nearly 2/3 of women report having been sexually harassed.
In some other parts of the world, those numbers are much higher.
Clearly something is not working quite right with the "romantic communication"
Here on page 10, you're showing again that my analogy was accurate:
"If you want to make sure you don't wreck, don't drive..."
"Everyone should avoid driving if they want to avoid a wreck, except when you're the only car on the highway..."
_________________
"If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is."
~~ John von Neumann
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
WHAT IF... The Moon Didn't Exist? |
21 Dec 2024, 6:46 am |
If only peer pressure didn't exist |
09 Jan 2025, 8:37 pm |
Can you help me to analyze the meaning of the little girl? |
15 Jan 2025, 12:53 pm |
Vicious attack on autistic girl of 14 - outraged |
05 Feb 2025, 11:40 am |