Nice Guys and Love, what's your take on the issue

Page 25 of 78 [ 1243 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 78  Next

Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

26 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm

Janissy wrote:
Nothing is misogynistic with asserting that women who consistently fall for @ssholes are responsible for their own mistakes. But that isn't what he asserted. Instead he asserted that women are "too stupid" to realize he would treat them right. That sentence itself makes me suspect that he would be unlikely to actually treat a woman right if he were with her. Part of treating a woman right is not being contemptuous of her intelligence.


I wouldn't call them stupid, but I would call them ignorant. I noticed that teenage girls almost always ignore nice guys and go for the ones every guy knows to be as*holes, however as they get older many women seem to pass that phase. Nevertheless, as a 16-year-old nice guy that's extremely frustrating and it's easy to become contemptuous of women's intelligence.

Janissy wrote:
Although lots of women are in abusive relationships, far more are in relationships that are not abusive but these get discounted by the "nice guys finish last" mythologists because it conflicts with their world view that paints all women as either being with "jerks" or being with them.


It does appear, though, as if most women are more attracted to "cool" and "macho" losers than to nice guys.

eck wrote:
You probably don't see the women who are smart enough to date nice guys because they are off the market.

A smart woman will walk away from you if she senses in any way that you think most women are stupid.


In my opinion, at least 90% of all people (regardless of race, gender or social background) is too stupid to have any sort of authority or irresponsible towards other people. Does that count?

I only date women of above-average intelligence and I've had about 5 exes.



eck
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 21

26 Dec 2009, 5:44 pm

Salonfilosoof wrote:
Janissy wrote:
Nevertheless, as a 16-year-old nice guy that's extremely frustrating and it's easy to become contemptuous of women's intelligence.

I only date women of above-average intelligence and I've had about 5 exes.


You are 16 and you have 5 smart exes?

You are getting more than a lot of 16 year olds.

What exactly was your complaint? Would you prefer to be going out with less intelligent girls?



Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

26 Dec 2009, 6:01 pm

eck wrote:
You are 16 and you have 5 smart exes?

You are getting more than a lot of 16 year olds.


I'm 28 and had my first girlfriend when I was 19.

When I said "as a 16-year-old nice guy that's extremely frustrating and it's easy to become contemptuous of women's intelligence" I was referring to how I felt when I was 16. Back then, I noticed that the greatest @$$holes o my age all had a girlfriend, whereas anyone I actually liked never could get any....



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

27 Dec 2009, 3:20 pm

Salonfilosoof wrote:
What's mysogynistic about a guy asserting that women who consistently fall for @$$holes are responsible for their own heartaches?

If you only date @$$holes and you ignore the nice guys because they aren't "your type", then you deserve all the pain and suffering that results from it. I couldn't agree more with the OP and I find if offensive when men are actually held responsible because I really don't see why I should be held accountible for women's poor taste in men....


Amen, Bro - I could not have worded it better myself. The ultimate truth of the dating game is this.......men might approach but ultimately women choose who they want to be with. If - given this - women are not clever enough to choose a partner that will treat them well, that is their own fault. That many women make the same mistakes over and over again says a lot for how much social intelligence a lot of women actually have.


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

27 Dec 2009, 3:40 pm

AspiRob wrote:
Salonfilosoof wrote:
What's mysogynistic about a guy asserting that women who consistently fall for @$$holes are responsible for their own heartaches?

If you only date @$$holes and you ignore the nice guys because they aren't "your type", then you deserve all the pain and suffering that results from it. I couldn't agree more with the OP and I find if offensive when men are actually held responsible because I really don't see why I should be held accountible for women's poor taste in men....


Amen, Bro - I could not have worded it better myself. The ultimate truth of the dating game is this.......men might approach but ultimately women choose who they want to be with. If - given this - women are not clever enough to choose a partner that will treat them well, that is their own fault. That many women make the same mistakes over and over again says a lot for how much social intelligence a lot of women actually have.


What does "treat them well" mean to you? In what way would you be different?



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

27 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm

Janissy wrote:
AspiRob wrote:
Salonfilosoof wrote:
What's mysogynistic about a guy asserting that women who consistently fall for @$$holes are responsible for their own heartaches?

If you only date @$$holes and you ignore the nice guys because they aren't "your type", then you deserve all the pain and suffering that results from it. I couldn't agree more with the OP and I find if offensive when men are actually held responsible because I really don't see why I should be held accountible for women's poor taste in men....


Amen, Bro - I could not have worded it better myself. The ultimate truth of the dating game is this.......men might approach but ultimately women choose who they want to be with. If - given this - women are not clever enough to choose a partner that will treat them well, that is their own fault. That many women make the same mistakes over and over again says a lot for how much social intelligence a lot of women actually have.


What does "treat them well" mean to you? In what way would you be different?


Good question but one that will have to satisfied with a fairly nebulous answer. I have always imagined a woman I was with as one I would treat with respect, care and affection. She would be my equal in life and the other half of my existence. I would never hit her or abuse her - I have never treated any female like that and I would never wish to. I know to a lot of women this all probably sounds a bit wimpy (especially to the women who go out with jerks), but that is how I would treat the woman of my dreams should I ever meet her.


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

28 Dec 2009, 8:11 am

Janissy wrote:
What does "treat them well" mean to you? In what way would you be different?


-- I never broke up in any of my previous relationships even when things were going really bad, because I believe that everything is fixable if only both partners are willing to put enough effort into it.

-- I have always respected my partner's needs and tried to fulfill them as much as possible.

-- I have never cheated on any of my girlfriends and never will.

-- I would never physically abuse my partner.

-- Every woman I was into a relationship with was a woman I saw as the potential mother of my future children. I never saw the point of pursuing many short term relationships or a one day buzz.



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

28 Dec 2009, 2:57 pm

Salonfilosoof wrote:
-- I never broke up in any of my previous relationships even when things were going really bad, because I believe that everything is fixable if only both partners are willing to put enough effort into it.

-- I have always respected my partner's needs and tried to fulfill them as much as possible.

-- I have never cheated on any of my girlfriends and never will.

-- I would never physically abuse my partner.

-- Every woman I was into a relationship with was a woman I saw as the potential mother of my future children. I never saw the point of pursuing many short term relationships or a one day buzz.


Well said!


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

28 Dec 2009, 3:03 pm

Salonfilosoof wrote:
-- I never broke up in any of my previous relationships even when things were going really bad, because I believe that everything is fixable if only both partners are willing to put enough effort into it.

-- I have always respected my partner's needs and tried to fulfill them as much as possible.

-- I have never cheated on any of my girlfriends and never will.

-- I would never physically abuse my partner.

-- Every woman I was into a relationship with was a woman I saw as the potential mother of my future children. I never saw the point of pursuing many short term relationships or a one day buzz.


Well said!


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


pippilngstkngpr
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 249
Location: New Jersey

29 Dec 2009, 4:59 am

For me I am attracted to nice guys. I haven't had that many nice guys attracted to me, I been getting all the jerks or dated all the jerks. Not so much fun.

I think most girls like the bad boy type, but I don't see why. When being treated horrible isn't a fun thing.

Even though most nice guys are shy, I even think it's very smexy. Yes, I said smexy. :)



AspiRob
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 304

29 Dec 2009, 5:13 am

pippilngstkngpr wrote:
I think most girls like the bad boy type, but I don't see why. When being treated horrible isn't a fun thing.

That is the basis of my whole argument.

pippilngstkngpr wrote:
Even though most nice guys are shy, I even think it's very smexy. Yes, I said smexy. :)

What is smexy?


_________________
I am highly in tune with my perceptions. It's reality that I haven't got a clue about.


monsterland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 837
Location: San Francisco, CA

04 Jan 2010, 5:32 am

Women go for guys with "jerky" attributes because they feel more comfortable with those who let a part of their dark side be visible to everyone. This means they can control it to a degree, and that they don't have a lot of surprises to hide.

Everyone has a dark side. Someone who appears to be always suppressing it to be "super nice" is intuitively perceived as a creepy timebomb.



Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

04 Jan 2010, 5:55 am

monsterland wrote:
Women go for guys with "jerky" attributes because they feel more comfortable with those who let a part of their dark side be visible to everyone. This means they can control it to a degree, and that they don't have a lot of surprises to hide.

Everyone has a dark side. Someone who appears to be always suppressing it to be "super nice" is intuitively perceived as a creepy timebomb.


BS.



monsterland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 837
Location: San Francisco, CA

04 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm

Obviously I shouldn't have implied that this is true for all women. I meant the women who go for perceived "jerks" over perceived "nice guys" - thats part of the reason why.



Salonfilosoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,184

04 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm

monsterland wrote:
Obviously I shouldn't have implied that this is true for all women. I meant the women who go for perceived "jerks" over perceived "nice guys" - thats part of the reason why.


It's still BS. Many women instinctively prefer jerks because they are more confident than nice guys. Women are attracted most of all to men who are very self-aware and confident. It has nothing to do with "showing your dark side".



monsterland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 837
Location: San Francisco, CA

04 Jan 2010, 3:38 pm

The part where they're simply drawn to the perceived alpha male is axiomic, and has been here present since cro magnons and beyond. Someone to protect them, shelter them, feed them. It is a deeply imprinted instinct.

An alpha male is not necessarily a jerk, but we're talking about jerks here, right ?

So, an extension of that alpha male attraction is where "i like it when he's a jerk to others and nice to me". Women don't just like alpha males. Many are drawn to "bad boys", especially at younger age. Many admit so., in those very words - "I like bad boys".

Note the word "bad". Flawed. Unpredictable. Dangerous. Exciting.

Not afraid to be in touch with their dark side.

...

P.S.

Note that you use the term "jerks", without quotes, yourself - and in the same breath, imply that the term has no negative connotations. I am confused.