why do girls think it's hot to act stupid?
I know a person who dresses like a complete trash whore (not to mention she'll do anything in pants) and yet has a very lucrative job. She's the worst kind of whore, then. Using it to get what she wants from men.
are you sure she just isn't lower class?
People with class just don't dress like whores. They sometimes want to come across sexy or cute, but don't look like trash.
She never had class. She came from crushing poverty (guess it's true what they say about how you can take a trailer park trash out of the trailer park, but you can't take the trailer park out of the trailer park trash), somehow 'made something of herself', but still has the mentality of one who was so poor she needed to use sex to get anything worthwhile.
Plus she has serious daddy issues; he practically ignored her growing up.
Theres your answer then. She has no class and thats why she does it. You can't buy class. Whats the good job just out of interest?
She handles things such as weaponized anthrax for the government.
And that's just the kind of person we need doing that, too
When a man likes sex with lots of women, nobody assumes he is therefore bad at his job. So why are you making that assumption about a woman? Where is the logical correlation between liking sex with multiple partners and being bad at work. I can see no reason other than blatant sexism for questioning the abilities of a woman who likes sex with multiple partners.
It's time to put to rest the idea that women who like sex with multiple partners are bad, incompetent, worthl;ess, unintelligent people with low self esteem. It's sexist. It's misogynist. It needs to stop.
happymusic
Veteran
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,165
Location: still in ninja land
It's time to put to rest the idea that women who like sex with multiple partners are bad, incompetent, worthl;ess, unintelligent people with low self esteem. It's sexist. It's misogynist. It needs to stop.
Yep. Couldn't have said it better. I was just thinking to myself that it's nice to know that misogyny is still alive and well. Women are so often damned if they do, damned if they don't. This has been a very depressing thread.
Fixed. Because ignorance is bliss.
Are or seem. They aren't all pretending, you know. A lot of people are just thick.
Thick girls need lovin' too.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,097
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
It's time to put to rest the idea that women who like sex with multiple partners are bad, incompetent, worthl;ess, unintelligent people with low self esteem. It's sexist. It's misogynist. It needs to stop.
This will never happen , even women call women who fool around as sluts , why so?
Because it's instinctive , it's in our DNA. How so?!
It's simple , really.
For a man, in order to him becomes a 'ladies-man' or gigolo (a man who have multiple partners) must have high qualities (such as great looks, great success, great wealth ...etc) otherwise he won't be able attract more than one woman in order to have sex with multiple partners . People respect people who are successful or gorgeous, those ladies-men are respected by other men and liked by women , not because they have multiple partners but because of their qualities and their high status. Them having many partners is just a manifestation of their good qualities.
It's not easy for a man to become a ladies-man and becoming able to have sex with multiple partners. A non-natively-alpha-male must do a lot of effort (going to gym ,taking dance courses, studying hard , running business...etc) in order to be a ladies-man , once this non-alpha man achieve this , he will become respected by men and liked by women ....people will respect the effort he did.
BUT this is not the case for women, a woman doesn't need to make any effort in order to become a ....well... gentlemen-woman? (female version of ladies-man), yes that's right.
Even a loser , bald , stupid , silly , fat and ugly woman can have multiple male partners with very little or no effort , she just have to go ahead to a horny man (or men) in some pub and aggressively excite him (or them). That's why people (men and women alike) see that act as 'cheap' because this woman isn't doing any effort at all for having sex , as I said people instinctively respect effort but they disrespect laziness and easy ways of getting things.
Also , if we want to go more instinct-wise, the man who can have multiple female partners is supposed to be a man with good genes , and he's improving humanity by spreading his good genes - that's the role of the alpha male in any species. Men and women instinctively respect that role.
While the gentlemen-woman is risking of being pregnant by a weak random male - that will harm the future generation of the species , ovaries are expensive and female mammals don't usually waste them for weak males , so a woman doing so is doing something that "contradicts nature" and contradicts the natural role of the female. That's why men and women alike disrespect those women and call them 'sluts'.
It's not right, but this how things are.
I know a person who dresses like a complete trash whore (not to mention she'll do anything in pants) and yet has a very lucrative job. She's the worst kind of whore, then. Using it to get what she wants from men.
are you sure she just isn't lower class?
People with class just don't dress like whores. They sometimes want to come across sexy or cute, but don't look like trash.
She never had class. She came from crushing poverty (guess it's true what they say about how you can take a trailer park trash out of the trailer park, but you can't take the trailer park out of the trailer park trash), somehow 'made something of herself', but still has the mentality of one who was so poor she needed to use sex to get anything worthwhile.
Plus she has serious daddy issues; he practically ignored her growing up.
Theres your answer then. She has no class and thats why she does it. You can't buy class. Whats the good job just out of interest?
She handles things such as weaponized anthrax for the government.
And that's just the kind of person we need doing that, too
When a man likes sex with lots of women, nobody assumes he is therefore bad at his job. So why are you making that assumption about a woman? Where is the logical correlation between liking sex with multiple partners and being bad at work. I can see no reason other than blatant sexism for questioning the abilities of a woman who likes sex with multiple partners.
It's time to put to rest the idea that women who like sex with multiple partners are bad, incompetent, worthl;ess, unintelligent people with low self esteem. It's sexist. It's misogynist. It needs to stop.
There's more to the story. Yes, this person has low self esteem. BIGTIME. And she's an attention whore.
She's not incompetent or worthless or unintelligent because she likes sex with multiple partners; she's immoral because she cheated on her husband. AND she uses it to manipulate people. IF ONLY she were just doing it for the sex; I'd have more respect for her then.
And she's a theif. She's bragged about stealing stuff from work. And she's a horribly manipulative person that tells lies about other people (she's personally told me many lies that I have verified are completely untrue) to get them on her side. She tries to sugarcoat her motives and real intentions by being really sweet and nice on the surface...until for some crazy reason she decides she doesn't like a person and then turns on them. And then gets all her friends to turn on that person too. It's not pretty. She'll impart motives to people that have no basis in reality. Yet because she's so sweet and nice the rest of the time to most of the people, a bunch of people think she's wonderful.
Last edited by Shebakoby on 25 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
nick007
Veteran
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,706
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA
I know a person who dresses like a complete trash whore (not to mention she'll do anything in pants) and yet has a very lucrative job. She's the worst kind of whore, then. Using it to get what she wants from men.
are you sure she just isn't lower class?
People with class just don't dress like whores. They sometimes want to come across sexy or cute, but don't look like trash.
She never had class. She came from crushing poverty (guess it's true what they say about how you can take a trailer park trash out of the trailer park, but you can't take the trailer park out of the trailer park trash), somehow 'made something of herself', but still has the mentality of one who was so poor she needed to use sex to get anything worthwhile.
Plus she has serious daddy issues; he practically ignored her growing up.
Theres your answer then. She has no class and thats why she does it. You can't buy class. Whats the good job just out of interest?
She handles things such as weaponized anthrax for the government.
And that's just the kind of person we need doing that, too
When a man likes sex with lots of women, nobody assumes he is therefore bad at his job. So why are you making that assumption about a woman? Where is the logical correlation between liking sex with multiple partners and being bad at work. I can see no reason other than blatant sexism for questioning the abilities of a woman who likes sex with multiple partners.
It's time to put to rest the idea that women who like sex with multiple partners are bad, incompetent, worthl;ess, unintelligent people with low self esteem. It's sexist. It's misogynist. It needs to stop.
There's more to the story. Yes, this person has low self esteem. BIGTIME. And she's an attention whore.
She's not incompetent or worthless or unintelligent because she likes sex with multiple partners; she's immoral because she cheated on her husband. AND she uses it to manipulate people. IF ONLY she were just doing it for the sex; I'd have more respect for her then.
And she's a theif. She's bragged about stealing stuff from work. And she's a horrible manipulative person that tells lies about other people (she's personally told me many lies that I have verified are completely untrue) to get them on her side. She tries to sugarcoat her motives and real intentions by being really sweet and nice on the surface...until for some crazy reason she decides she doesn't like a person and then turns on them. And then gets all her friends to turn on that person too. It's not pretty. She'll impart motives to people that have no basis in reality. Yet because she's so sweet and nice the rest of the time to most of the people, a bunch of people think she's wonderful.
I've seen women acting slu*ty at work before so they could manipulate guys into doing their work for them.
I don't have a problem with women who are stupid but I do have a problem when women are doing it to trick guys
_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
"Hear all, trust nothing"
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,097
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
It's time to put to rest the idea that women who like sex with multiple partners are bad, incompetent, worthl;ess, unintelligent people with low self esteem. It's sexist. It's misogynist. It needs to stop.
This will never happen , even women call women who fool around as sluts , why so?
Because it's instinctive , it's in our DNA. How so?!
It's simple , really.
For a man, in order to him becomes a 'ladies-man' or gigolo (a man who have multiple partners) must have high qualities (such as great looks, great success, great wealth ...etc) otherwise he won't be able attract more than one woman in order to have sex with multiple partners . People respect people who are successful or gorgeous, those ladies-men are respected by other men and liked by women , not because they have multiple partners but because of their qualities and their high status. Them having many partners is just a manifestation of their good qualities.
It's not easy for a man to become a ladies-man and becoming able to have sex with multiple partners. A non-natively-alpha-male must do a lot of effort (going to gym ,taking dance courses, studying hard , running business...etc) in order to be a ladies-man , once this non-alpha man achieve this , he will become respected by men and liked by women ....people will respect the effort he did.
BUT this is not the case for women, a woman doesn't need to make any effort in order to become a ....well... gentlemen-woman? (female version of ladies-man), yes that's right.
Even a loser , bald , stupid , silly , fat and ugly woman can have multiple male partners with very little or no effort , she just have to go ahead to a horny man (or men) in some pub and aggressively excite him (or them). That's why people (men and women alike) see that act as 'cheap' because this woman isn't doing any effort at all for having sex , as I said people instinctively respect effort but they disrespect laziness and easy ways of getting things.
Also , if we want to go more instinct-wise, the man who can have multiple female partners is supposed to be a man with good genes , and he's improving humanity by spreading his good genes - that's the role of the alpha male in any species. Men and women instinctively respect that role.
While the gentlemen-woman is risking of being pregnant by a weak random male - that will harm the future generation of the species , ovaries are expensive and female mammals don't usually waste them for weak males , so a woman doing so is doing something that "contradicts nature" and contradicts the natural role of the female. That's why men and women alike disrespect those women and call them 'sluts'.
It's not right, but this how things are.
Hale_bopp summed up my post in another thread:
If a key can open many locks - It's a master key.
If a lock is opened by many keys - it's a f*cking sh*tty lock.
Funny you should mention animal instincts too - in many other mammals half the time the female doesn't have any choice and it's painful.
TBH - I don't think sleeping around is classy or attractive, in men or women, and humans are much more complicated than other earth species. (besides chimps)
excellent post!
I don't see anything depressing about it.
I also don't really see anything 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' about it. Maybe 'damned if you do', but not the other half.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
happymusic
Veteran
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,165
Location: still in ninja land
I don't see anything depressing about it.
I also don't really see anything 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' about it. Maybe 'damned if you do', but not the other half.
If you don't put out you're a tease. Yet if you have sex with who you want when you want or if your clothing even suggests such a mindset, you're easily called, and I quote from earlier posts in this thread, skank, slut or whore. None of these terms is positive. Women have been repeatedly bashed in this thread in ways that men simply would not be. It is the double standard that is depressing. How one cannot see the shame in nick007's post is beyond me. Just in case anyone missed it, here it is again:
Many of the posts that followed weren't much bettert, either. The lack of compassion and dehumanizing objectification is what is sad.
nick007
Veteran
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,706
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA
I don't see anything depressing about it.
I also don't really see anything 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' about it. Maybe 'damned if you do', but not the other half.
If you don't put out you're a tease. Yet if you have sex with who you want when you want or if your clothing even suggests such a mindset, you're easily called, and I quote from earlier posts in this thread, skank, slut or whore. None of these terms is positive. Women have been repeatedly bashed in this thread in ways that men simply would not be. It is the double standard that is depressing. How one cannot see the shame in nick007's post is beyond me. Just in case anyone missed it, here it is again:
Many of the posts that followed weren't much bettert, either. The lack of compassion and dehumanizing objectification is what is sad.
If a woman dresses like a whore & acts like a whore; I'll call a whore like I see it. I'm sure as hell will NOT call her classy, conservative & a great role model. If a woman does not want to be thought of as a whore; she should NOT act or dress like one. I know some women who like being thought of as whores & they brag about it. Women think being a whore is a great thing to be nowadays because they see people on MTV dressing, dancing & acting slu*ty
_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
"Hear all, trust nothing"
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition
Last edited by nick007 on 26 Jun 2010, 12:21 am, edited 5 times in total.
a long long time ago, clothes meaned things. That is, what someone wore said something about the person. Literally. I'm talking about the ancient world, where you knew a 'temple prostitute' by what she wore. So it's deeply ingrained that what someone wears means something. It'll take a long time to dissociate.
Hopeless_Hearts_Marie
Snowy Owl
Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 131
Location: Iowa USA
Girls, please don't let anyone discourage you from wearing what you want to wear. If you wish to wear short skirts, high heels, and a small top without a bra, do so.
However, you deserve to know that if you do such, "trashy" is likely to come to my mind when seeing you. There are exceptions, and maybe you're one of them, but I recommend going for something more elegant, and tight enough to show off your lovely form.
_________________
Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,525
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
However, you deserve to know that if you do such, "trashy" is likely to come to my mind when seeing you. There are exceptions, and maybe you're one of them, but I recommend going for something more elegant, and tight enough to show off your lovely form.
I think what comes to mind is that we're all judged on how we dress (m or f) - how we see ourselves in the mirror is one half of the paradigm, the other half is the mess we have to clean up if we play it stubborn. The opportunity cost typically works itself out somewhere in the middle.
Clothes still absolutely do communicate meaning, and I expect always will.
_________________
Not currently a moderator
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Stupid Songs |
18 Jan 2025, 11:18 pm |
So smart, look stupid!! |
22 Dec 2024, 2:42 pm |
Crazy, loyal or just plain stupid |
27 Dec 2024, 11:09 am |
Why is The Stupid Cupid 1944 the Worst LT Short? |
05 Jan 2025, 12:01 pm |