Page 4 of 14 [ 217 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next

Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

26 Feb 2011, 3:14 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
abaisse wrote:
Grisha wrote:
Scanning this thread just reinforces my disillusionment with religion in general.

It's so divisive and negative, all people write about is who they don't like based solely on their views on the subject - I thought it was supposed to be the exact opposite...


The only type of person (in a religious sense) I couldn't date is an atheist. It doesn't mean they are bad people. That choice isn't a spiritual one. It's a practical one. If I'm a Christian and I'm with someone who's bashing my beliefs or thinks I'm not intelligent because I believe in a God, that relationship isn't going to work out well. I'm not saying I need to date a Christian, but I do need (for compatibility sake) to date someone that respects the fact that I believe in God.


That's ridiculous really , atheists can be deep too, I know that because I am one.

and please define me "spirituality" :roll:

and if your bible God is that strong then you shouldn't care if someone bash it, it's al Mighty! He wouldn't be affected and he doesn't need your protection and defense.

Not all atheists bash others' belief , but almost ALL Christians and Muslims believe that I deserve to end up burning for eternity in hell just because I am atheist!

So who has it worse? eh? Dating someone who's bashing your beliefs and your invincible god? or dating someone who thinks that you deserve the worst pain?


Well said. I believe the universe is infinite and constantly changing, instead of being linear and having a cosmic boss over it all. I don't think that makes me shallow in the least; I think it means there is always more to think about and to discover, without restrictions.

To everyone else, I apologize if I seemed like an ass earlier. I get kind of touchy about this due to past experiences, and while I can be friends with people who can agree to disagree with me on this subject, I just don't think having a lifelong romantic partner who thinks I deserve to be eternally punished if I don't come to their dogmatic conclusion before I die (even if I'm an ethical person) is in my best interest or in theirs.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

26 Feb 2011, 6:50 am

You know, the moment I checked this thread, I realized just how bad being in a relationship with a religious person can be. A religious person isn't willing to be as realistic as one can be; he/she isn't willing to compromise every single belief he/she currently holds in favor of what's been shown to be true; he/she isn't going to be ready to connect with you intellectually in all aspects because religious dogma has more power on him/her than any rational views; he/she is going to allow religious obstacles to emerge in his/her relationship with you (obstacles that wouldn't have appeared otherwise). And so on.

It's not worth it.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

26 Feb 2011, 6:57 am

I don't mind atheists. It's antitheists that bother me, along with fundamentalists of any other religious persuasion.

Anyone with a dogmatic approach to things isn't going to gel with me at all.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

26 Feb 2011, 8:54 am

:wink:

Laz wrote:
Are you a panthiest?


Yes - I think Spinoza articulated my beliefs pretty well, Henry Thoreau's Walden is like my bible.

Being out in nature is like visiting a cathedral, studying nature is like going to church.

I tried to learn who I was supposed to hate in order to go to Heaven, but I guess I'm beyond help in this regard... :wink:



Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

26 Feb 2011, 8:55 am

hale_bopp wrote:
I think it's more the complete clashing of opinions on our entire being. I wouldn't date an athiest, as I have to spiritually connect with a partner.


So you only date Christians?



ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

26 Feb 2011, 11:44 am

starygrrl wrote:
I would never date a born again Christian. To religious. Plain and simple, my secular views do not mesh well with a person with strong religous ones.

I will be completely honest, a person being very religous may very well be a liability with me, especially if it is dogmatic faith.


Would you date a liberal christian though?



wefunction
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,486

26 Feb 2011, 4:45 pm

Moog wrote:
I don't mind atheists. It's antitheists that bother me, along with fundamentalists of any other religious persuasion.

Anyone with a dogmatic approach to things isn't going to gel with me at all.


This is closer to how I view things. But I don't disqualify someone for having a dogmatic belief. For me, it's about respect more than anything else. I don't gel with anyone who has to cram their beliefs down my throat.



Wombat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2006
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,051

26 Feb 2011, 11:10 pm

Perhaps I should meet a nice Muslim woman who would accept me as her master and do whatever I told her.

I would be allowed to beat her or even kill her if she displeased me.

I could divorce her by just saying "I divorce you" three times.

And I could have up to four wives at a time! :D As young as 14!

Where do I sign up? :D



Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

27 Feb 2011, 12:09 am

Wombat wrote:
Perhaps I should meet a nice Muslim woman who would accept me as her master and do whatever I told her.

I would be allowed to beat her or even kill her if she displeased me.

I could divorce her by just saying "I divorce you" three times.

And I could have up to four wives at a time! :D As young as 14!

Where do I sign up? :D


Quick, try the police station!



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,897

27 Feb 2011, 5:21 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
and so I did, I left my 'religion field as blank......in fact this is more accurate since atheism isn't a religion , it's the absence of religion.

Yup......atheism is a religion in the sense that not collecting stamps is a hobby.



01001011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 991

27 Feb 2011, 7:29 am

One thing I don't understand is why people (esp. girls) think
mysticism = spiritual = deep
science and rational = shallow



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

27 Feb 2011, 7:42 am

01001011 wrote:
One thing I don't understand is why people (esp. girls) think
mysticism = spiritual = deep
science and rational = shallow


Let's add a few more keywords:

intuition, feeling, direct experience, right brain, traditionally female principles or qualities + mysticism = spiritual = deep

logic, abstraction, detachment, left brain, traditionally male principles or qualities + science and rational = shallow

Does that help?


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

27 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm

ToughDiamond wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
and so I did, I left my 'religion field as blank......in fact this is more accurate since atheism isn't a religion , it's the absence of religion.

Yup......atheism is a religion in the sense that not collecting stamps is a hobby.


Atheism is a religion as much as bald is a hair color. :lol:



Zur-Darkstar
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 332

27 Feb 2011, 5:03 pm

Atheism isn't an absence of religion, or an absence of anything. Atheism is quite simply the belief that there is no higher power or deity responsible for the creation of the universe, just as Christianity might be defined as the worship of Christ as the earthly incarnation of the universal creator of the Hebrew religion. Atheism is often accompanied by the dogma that there is nothing beyond this life and that nothing exists besides or beyond the physically definable universe. Christianity, and its various denominations, has many different and often conflicting dogmas as well, and in fact, few Christians agree on very much of anything beyond God and Jesus. When I think of Atheism, I think of Dr. House. He believes in what he can see and perceive and measure and nothing else. For him, objective reality is all there is. In that sense, atheism is a faith in that it is a set of beliefs that define how one sees the world. It is not an organized religion, but it meets the criteria to be called simply a "religion".

An absence of religion would more accurately be applied to someone who has no beliefs about God or spirituality one way or the other. If that describes you, you should probably identify yourself as non religious or agnostic.
In other words

Atheism=There is no god
Absence of religion=I don't know and I don't care


_________________
Self-Diagnosed Dec. 2010
135 Aspie, 65 NT--Aspie Quiz
AQ 40
BAPD--124 aloof, 88 rigid, 83 pragmatic
EQ/SQ--21/78--Extreme systematizing


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,897

28 Feb 2011, 5:51 am

I think that a big difference between religion and atheism is that religions always have dogma and rules attached, whereas atheism (and Zen) don't. I suppose you could get a dogmatic atheist, but mostly I think atheists just don't do god, and they leave it at that.

Nobody can objectively conclude that there is no god, because it's not possible to demonstrate the non-existence of anything. My own view is that for all practical purposes it seems reasonsably safe to assume there is no god. I'm not likely to go chasing after evidence to the contrary, and if somebody wanted to present me with such evidence, I wouldn't be enthusiastic about taking a look, because I think the balance of probabilities is that it would be a waste of time....but I could never be absolutely certain there was no god, in the same way as I could never be absolutely certain that a telemarketer wasn't doing me a favour by calling me.



01001011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 991

28 Feb 2011, 11:13 am

Moog wrote:
01001011 wrote:
One thing I don't understand is why people (esp. girls) think
mysticism = spiritual = deep
science and rational = shallow


Let's add a few more keywords:

intuition, feeling, direct experience, right brain, traditionally female principles or qualities + mysticism = spiritual = deep

logic, abstraction, detachment, left brain, traditionally male principles or qualities + science and rational = shallow

Does that help?


So love of science and rationality is a turn off for most girls. How sad.