Preference for overweight women

Post Reply New Topic

i read that it was 64% were overweight or obese

just because they majority of people are, doesnt mean its healthy or attractive

my 6'2" and 165 pound frame will probobly change for sure as the years go by, with how much junk i eat, i wont be suprised if i top the 200 bracket by the time im in my 30s, hell i wouldnt be suprised if i hit 210

And just because you say it isn't, doesn't mean it isn't.

















You just sent me the same message twice.

That first line was for condom51

Don't say that thing about bipolar women....my girlfriend sometimes tries to convince me she is one (aspie) but I swear she's just trying to be like me and she's not.

I find it interesting that y'all know the BMI is a poor measure if someone is overweight, but then quote statistics based on the BMI.

I truthfully don't know of any other measure used to measure it,
even if I think it's....let's just say "silly".

eh statistics are statistics it's not like there are any studies I know of where anyone got thorough accurate data on body fat measurements, you can assume that the big sample size dilutes things so that it is a bit of a better representation than BMI by itself, after all nowhere near 1% of people are body builders (the people who are most wrongfully considered obese).

i read that it was 64% were overweight or obese

just because they majority of people are, doesnt mean its healthy or attractive

my 6'2" and 165 pound frame will probobly change for sure as the years go by, with how much junk i eat, i wont be suprised if i top the 200 bracket by the time im in my 30s, hell i wouldnt be suprised if i hit 210

You probably read it right, that way seems to agree with Bethie's statistics. I always thought obese and overweight were mutually exclusive terminologies. After all nobody says "I'm overweight AND obese!" I'm damned to be under 190 my whole life unless I work out like 3 hours a day, then I might could push beyond 190 in raw muscle. Just the way my family works.

Goddamn it, I wish I hadn't deleted that LAZ sig.

But it goes along the lines of, you have a severe character defect when you claim to speak for 3+ Billion men on the planet.

Last edited by hale_bopp on 22 Mar 2011, 2:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

You sound like a weiner. You might want to learn about people's bodies one day, there's this thing called metabolism. Not everyone is a carbon copy of you and your "Mom"
Go and bulk up a bit then come back. Seriously though, what kind of replies do you expect from those sort of posts?

I need to stop goading this kid.

naw, keep goading it's good for your post count

Well it's hard not to when someone displays stupidity that would make Jersey shore look like a phd class.

They're exclusive distinctions, but not mutually-
someone who is obese IS overweight,
but one doesn't have to be obese to be considered overweight-
similar to the way a vegan is a vegetarian, but that doesn't specifically denote their further differences from the "norm".
It's also entirely possible I'm being overly-etymological with "overweight".

The stats I was referencing are from the CDC, and they're only recent as of 2007-2008, I think,
though I doubt the percentages have done anything but grown.

I wasn't appealing to the BMI before,
merely pointing out that,
for *someone* (cough, cough!)
who forms aesthetic/health opinions based on a simplistic height + weight ratio,
and then by that very ratio declares that women who are arguably-average (in my opinion) are "big",
his perceptions of women's size seem to be completely-divorced from any actual statistical NORM.

If someone makes Jersey Shore look like a PHD class there's a lot less shame for someone who would enjoy "intimate encounters" with Snooki....

I'm pretty shocked my depiction of my personal sentiments on this person from page 2 hasn't been deleted.