should women hide their feelings?

Page 4 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Cilantro
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Apr 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 450
Location: Minnesota, USA

17 May 2013, 12:31 am

MCalavera wrote:

Explain why you just shrugged and moved on with such ease if you actually cared.

You seem oblivious to the consequences of the actions you may have caused. Maybe that played a role in why your friend did what he did. You did say he was initially very caring towards you after all.

Now if it was indeed a manipulative game he was playing and he did it for no valid reason, this still doesn't change the fact that you actually didn't get affected at all by his behavior. Now that's understandable if you didn't care and have much interest in him, but you say/imply that you actually did care, and that one I have a hard time believing.


I didn't shrug and move on. How would I have gotten information from him about what was going on if I did?



Last edited by Cilantro on 17 May 2013, 12:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

MjrMajorMajor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,748

17 May 2013, 12:33 am

Cilantro wrote:
MCalavera wrote:

Explain why you just shrugged and moved on with such ease if you actually cared.

You seem oblivious to the consequences of the actions you may have caused. Maybe that played a role in why your friend did what he did. You did say he was initially very caring towards you after all.

Now if it was indeed a manipulative game he was playing and he did it for no valid reason, this still doesn't change the fact that you actually didn't get affected at all by his behavior. Now that's understandable if you didn't care and have much interest in him, but you say/imply that you actually did care, and that one I have a hard time believing.


I didn't shrug and move on.


I sense some projection.



Cilantro
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Apr 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 450
Location: Minnesota, USA

17 May 2013, 12:35 am

MjrMajorMajor wrote:
Cilantro wrote:
MCalavera wrote:

Explain why you just shrugged and moved on with such ease if you actually cared.

You seem oblivious to the consequences of the actions you may have caused. Maybe that played a role in why your friend did what he did. You did say he was initially very caring towards you after all.

Now if it was indeed a manipulative game he was playing and he did it for no valid reason, this still doesn't change the fact that you actually didn't get affected at all by his behavior. Now that's understandable if you didn't care and have much interest in him, but you say/imply that you actually did care, and that one I have a hard time believing.


I didn't shrug and move on.


I sense some projection.


:roll:



GregCav
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 679
Location: Australia

17 May 2013, 12:36 am

madbirdgirl;

I've read many book on relationships. I recomend you do the same.

There is considerable difference between male and female views on love and relationship. To understand these differences you'll need to read, without the understanding you'll make every mistake available (and there are many).

"Women are from Venus, Men are from Mars" is a simple introductory book on the subject. There are more meaty ones available also.

To answer your question;
If you jump straight to sex, your setting up the expectation that this relationship will be based on sex. The male mind is fairly simple in this regard. What you do to start with is what he'll expect to continue.

If you want a serious and worthwhile relationship (according to every book I've read), set up the relationhip FIRST, before sex. Sex is the icing on the cake, the reward between two partners. It's not the thing to form the relationship in the first place, nor to maintain it. It should be viewed as a mutual love between two people who love each other. Not the glue that binds the relationship. Get the relationship first, all else follows.



MjrMajorMajor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,748

17 May 2013, 12:38 am

So Cilantro, elaborate. How do you feel that there was any game playing or manipulation from your description?



Cilantro
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Apr 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 450
Location: Minnesota, USA

17 May 2013, 12:40 am

MjrMajorMajor wrote:
So elaborate. How do you feel that there was any game playing or manipulation from your description?


Because he verbally confessed to me that he'd done it to see if I cared enough to notice and say something. I really don't see why people are so invested in trying to convince me that I was in the wrong in this interaction.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,043
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

17 May 2013, 1:20 am

Cilantro wrote:
MCalavera wrote:

Explain why you just shrugged and moved on with such ease if you actually cared.

You seem oblivious to the consequences of the actions you may have caused. Maybe that played a role in why your friend did what he did. You did say he was initially very caring towards you after all.

Now if it was indeed a manipulative game he was playing and he did it for no valid reason, this still doesn't change the fact that you actually didn't get affected at all by his behavior. Now that's understandable if you didn't care and have much interest in him, but you say/imply that you actually did care, and that one I have a hard time believing.


I didn't shrug and move on. How would I have gotten information from him about what was going on if I did?


Question: Were you used to initiate anything with him? And if so how frequent? Once in a week, a month?

Reciprocity in initiating conversation/calls/texting do matter, if it's only one sided the initiator would feel soon enough the other party is not caring back, at all. Even worse, when the usual initiator waits for the other party initiates and this never happens...even for days.

Ok maybe removing you from FB was bit immature and he could test things more subtly, but if the case was like I said then I totally UNDERSTAND HIM and I would be sided with him too.

There's nothing more absurd and frustrating when your supposed gf/date never initiates. There was a girl I dated several times, she never said no to a date/outing and always replied to texts/calls on a daily basis, and during the dates she was pretty responsive, enjoying and all, but the problem that she never initiated, at the end I felt I was being too pushy for being the only one who's always initiating all, turned out that no matter how long I waited (even for a whole week including weekend) she never initiated ever and she was being active on fb/whatsapp and all, I mean what if I was sick and dying? She didn't even care to check if I was alive. What kind of interest/caring is that? Why she was even dating me?

It's your actions that show whether you really care for someone or not, not cheap words.

And ah, reciprocity applies on close friends too.



Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 17 May 2013, 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cilantro
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Apr 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 450
Location: Minnesota, USA

17 May 2013, 1:42 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Question: Were you used to initiate anything with him? And if so how frequent? Once in a week, a month?

Reciprocity in initiating conversation/calls/texting do matter, if it's only one sided the initiator would feel soon enough the other party is not caring back, at all. Even worse, when the usual initiator waits for the other party initiates and this never happens...even for days.

Ok maybe removing you from FB was bit immature and he could test things more subtly, but if the case was like I said then I totally UNDERSTAND HIM and I would be sided with him too.

There's nothing more absurd and frustrating when your supposed gf/date never initiates. There was a girl I dated several times, she never said no to a date/outing and always replied to texts/calls on a daily basis but the problem that she never initiated, at the end I felt I was being too pushy for being the only one who's always initiating all, turned out that no matter how long I waited (even for a whole week including weekend) she never initiated ever and she was being active on fb/whatsapp and all, I mean what if I was sick and dying? She didn't even care to check if I was alive. What kind of interest is that?

It's your actions that show whether you really care for someone or not, not cheap words.


I'm aware of reciprocity. I initiated about half of our interactions, maybe a little less.

Just going to state that Asperger's doesn't necessarily mean one's social perceptions and judgments are invalid, especially if they've been aware of and attempting to improve for a long time. Awkwardness, poor social skills, miscommunications, and a hundred other things that aren't actually exclusive to Asperger's regularly occur in NT-NT interactions without rendering them both inept. This is an uncomfortable thread.



Last edited by Cilantro on 17 May 2013, 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

cakey
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

17 May 2013, 1:46 am

About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys. I just know one thing: I personally hate the games that people play when they like each other. They say girls must "play hard to get" in order for a guy to be interested. I don't dabble in all of that. When I looked for a partner, and after I express interest I reveal how I'm direct and not into the mind games. The people that I have dated all agreed with me on this. If perhaps I met a guy that played around(ie, not calling for some days in a row to "play hard to get"), I would not be with him and move on. If I like someone and they like me back, I think it should all be direct and clear. If those guys you talked about really lost interest or left because of a silly social rule, then perhaps they weren't worth it.

But, I would say that those social games in dating actually works for those who participate in it. For example, My friend was crazy over a guy and was complaining that he never texted back to her texts. ASfter she decided to play hard to get and ignore him, he began to text her daily. Then when she texted daily again, he stopped. I still believe they are playing hard to get even after some months. :roll:


_________________
Neurotypical. I'm very friendly; feel free to message me. :)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,043
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

17 May 2013, 1:53 am

cakey wrote:
About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys. I just know one thing: I personally hate the games that people play when they like each other. They say girls must "play hard to get" in order for a guy to be interested. I don't dabble in all of that. When I looked for a partner, and after I express interest I reveal how I'm direct and not into the mind games. The people that I have dated all agreed with me on this. If perhaps I met a guy that played around(ie, not calling for some days in a row to "play hard to get"), I would not be with him and move on. If I like someone and they like me back, I think it should all be direct and clear. If those guys you talked about really lost interest or left because of a silly social rule, then perhaps they weren't worth it.


What I did wasn't a game, I was very verbally direct in my interest, I simply felt being pushy for initiating every time so I gave her space, several times, to initiate but she never did which led me to the obvious conclusion.

Quote:
About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys.


What do you mean by that? hm? Why does it depend on guys not on girls lol.



cakey
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

17 May 2013, 2:40 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
cakey wrote:
About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys. I just know one thing: I personally hate the games that people play when they like each other. They say girls must "play hard to get" in order for a guy to be interested. I don't dabble in all of that. When I looked for a partner, and after I express interest I reveal how I'm direct and not into the mind games. The people that I have dated all agreed with me on this. If perhaps I met a guy that played around(ie, not calling for some days in a row to "play hard to get"), I would not be with him and move on. If I like someone and they like me back, I think it should all be direct and clear. If those guys you talked about really lost interest or left because of a silly social rule, then perhaps they weren't worth it.


What I did wasn't a game, I was very verbally direct in my interest, I simply felt being pushy for initiating every time so I gave her space, several times, to initiate but she never did which led me to the obvious conclusion.

Quote:
About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys.


What do you mean by that? hm? Why does it depend on guys not on girls lol.


I meant that when the OP was concerned about moving too quick with a guy, some guys like direct girls and some don't(some like the hard-to-get-game). Also some girls like to play the social dating games as well. Some girls actually are attracted to guys who ignore them(like my friend).


_________________
Neurotypical. I'm very friendly; feel free to message me. :)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,043
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

17 May 2013, 3:29 am

cakey wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
cakey wrote:
About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys. I just know one thing: I personally hate the games that people play when they like each other. They say girls must "play hard to get" in order for a guy to be interested. I don't dabble in all of that. When I looked for a partner, and after I express interest I reveal how I'm direct and not into the mind games. The people that I have dated all agreed with me on this. If perhaps I met a guy that played around(ie, not calling for some days in a row to "play hard to get"), I would not be with him and move on. If I like someone and they like me back, I think it should all be direct and clear. If those guys you talked about really lost interest or left because of a silly social rule, then perhaps they weren't worth it.


What I did wasn't a game, I was very verbally direct in my interest, I simply felt being pushy for initiating every time so I gave her space, several times, to initiate but she never did which led me to the obvious conclusion.

Quote:
About girls initiating moves: It depends on the guys.


What do you mean by that? hm? Why does it depend on guys not on girls lol.


I meant that when the OP was concerned about moving too quick with a guy, some guys like direct girls and some don't(some like the hard-to-get-game). Also some girls like to play the social dating games as well. Some girls actually are attracted to guys who ignore them(like my friend).


Btw, things didn't remain mystery with that girl, I did ask her whether she really likes me or not - she confessed she's in love with someone unattainable.

So I was totally right with my conclusion, actions always speak for themselves.



cakey
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

17 May 2013, 3:33 am

^I just barely read your story, sorry. I was genrally talking about the OP. But I agree with your conclusion. I would have thought they had no interesdt if they weren't responsive either. I honestly can't tell if the girl you went out with did it on purpose or if she really had no interest, that's great that you were direct. I think direct works best for me too.


_________________
Neurotypical. I'm very friendly; feel free to message me. :)


hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

17 May 2013, 7:03 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Quote:
Male aspies don't have the same problem, because they are stuck with the unenviable social position of being expected to pursue.


I do envy that. I hate that I'm expected to just wait until he makes a move. I would like to say, "hey do you want to catch a coffee?" But the last time I did that the guy looked away shyly and said "no it's ok." That was about 5 years ago. I've decided that I'm not making the moves anymore. Waste of my time. I like my friend's friend, I don't know him that well, but what I do know I like, but I think he'd die of shock if I actually invited him out somewhere, even if there were others going. I've decided he's just not that into me and I will move on.

I've got to the point with romance that it's really not worth the hassle.


Then why do you envy man's social position to pursue if you already gave up from the first go?


:lol:

This is a so typical excuse of women saying why they don't pursue, they face rejection once and give up forever.


If you'll notice my words were: "But the last time I did that..." Not the first and only time I did that. Please read things before jumping to stereotypical conclusions. Or at least excuse me for being too lazy to type more examples...

I'll give another example, I met this guy at a party when I was in my early 20s and he seemed to like me (he told my friend I looked like a model), so I got his phone number off of our mutual friend and sms messaged him just something like "hey how are you, do you remember we me at the party". I can't remember exactly what he said, (my early 20s are but a distant memory) but he wasn't very nice about it and wasn't happy I'd tried to contact him. There were other guys and similar experiences I can recount. I seem to not do things the way I'm meant to or behave the way guys want me to. I just don't fit in with normal expectations of how to behave.

At least if I was male then if I attempted to ask someone out and I failed I would think, "we'll at least I did what was expected of me. Moving on..." As I woman I think, "maybe I shouldn't have tried to step outside the box." It hurts to be rejected for either gender, it is certainly not worse for me than it would be for a man, but I feel like when I try and fail I have this sort of guilt, like I should have known better and not tried in the first place. What a few of my friends and aunts say to me is, "if I guy likes you, you'll know it. He will want to be around you. If he doesn't make an effort he's just not that into you."

When I say I give up, I wasn't specifically saying I give up asking guys out in favour of sitting on my laurels and waiting like a queen for men to pander to me, I mean that I give up on finding someone that actually fancies me enough to want to spend time with me whether it's me that asks to meet up for a coffe or him.



fallingandlaughing
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 7

31 May 2013, 8:27 am

MoonriseGirl, it's like you just read my mind. I know I shouldn't pursue men and I understand all the reasons why. I can see that it's a biological urge they have to chase and all of that. But I find it so difficult to comprehend or deal with in reality. I loose respect for men I have to play games with.

MoonriseGirl wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
to the OP- you are laudibly real but struggling in an unreal social world. make your own world, hopefully with the best man/person you can find to share it with.


I think this is a good explanation.

Male aspies don't have the same problem, because they are stuck with the unenviable social position of being expected to pursue. We simply hang out & have to figure out what to do when others pursue us. It is confounding. It is problematic. Sometimes, it is even dangerous. I'm not saying it's a cakewalk.

I am the same way & completely identify with what you wrote. If I like somebody, I like them. I'm not confused. I think a lot of females with Asperger's are in the same boat, because we're very observant & know what we want. We're great analyzers, so it's no big mystery to us.

If you like someone & have reasonably good self-esteem, why not just tell the guy? It's the logical thing to do. Plus, he seems confused, & you want to solve the problem & un-confuse him, because it doesn't seem right not to.

HOWEVER, it never goes well.

Disclaimer: (Talking about male NT's here, because I never had the luxury of dating an aspie. ;))

In fact, it doesn't matter how evolved a guy seems or how intelligent he is. It doesn't matter if he's asked you out already or brought you chocolates. If you admit you like him too fast, you are toast. He doesn't think, "Wow! This girl is such a genius that she assessed my strengths & weaknesses superfast & sees how awesome I am." Most people don't assess quickly, so he probably thinks there is no way you know what you think of him that quickly. His first thought will probably be that you are desperate & like him because you can't get anyone else.

On the other hand, the guys I have zero interest in go completely nuts for me. It doesn't matter how many times I say no, they will harass & beg for dates. If I finally give in & go on a date to try to be open-minded... it's begging for the next date or to go out... The problem is, it isn't an act. I really don't like them. It's like guys really, really like girls who aren't into them.

That's the conundrum of not playing games.

I'm not saying I haven't had great relationships, but they've almost all been with women. What I like about women is they aren't gamey. & they LOVE to be loved, liked or crushed on. So, you can just say what you think or feel & the biggest danger is they'll want to move in with you too fast! Hope that isn't too much information. But, I think it's interesting that the two genders are so opposite on this.

Personally, I can't stoop to playing the game, because I cannot both play the game and also respect the man. And, why would I love someone I can't respect? It doesn't even make sense. If I have to play reverse psychology to manipulate someone into loving me, I cannot make myself love him. I will always seem him as inferior. So, either I can love him, or he can love me. Or, maybe someday I will find the right person who doesn't play games either... & if it's a man, someone sharp enough to acknowledge my merits without me having to put on some stupid act.

However, if you want to be seen as a good catch, you do have to slowly reveal how you feel- just like the other person said. Here's something to consider as well. Some female aspies may be more quick to commit, because we are more comfortable with definitions, perimeters & rules. Dating is fuzzy, uncomfortable ground & it would be cool to skip to a more relaxed & predictable sort of relationship. It is way less scary, in a way, to just be going out already. For guys, though, I think that part can be the scary part & they have to get their feet wet very, very slowly. It's too much of a shock to jump in like that for most of them. What may be doable for you is to focus on slowing down THAT part. Perhaps think about how slower relationships are healthier... & why it is wise to get to know each other better... You may be able to do this whole thing without lying at all. I know I'm naturally slow to commit & people do seem to seek relationships more aggressively because of it.

However, you have to think about your priorities in life & what you really want. I know I am too proud & can't compromise. Except, I am happy alone. I'm happy either way, so I can take or leave a relationship. There's no question of whether or not to compromise my principles, because even if I could, I don't have to. Also, women are an option for me, so I'm not really stuck on that road.

I don't judge others for playing the game, because of how unsuccessful I've been with men by not playing it! haha I just know it isn't for me.

But what do you believe about human nature? What do you believe about men? What do you find to be true? What does your experience tell you? What is the reality & what is the best you can do with it?

Can you compromise a little or slow down to try to have the kind of relationship you want? Are you able to? Would it damage your self-esteem or relationship with your self if you did?

I have thought a lot about this whole phenomenon.

The usual explanation is a biological one... men have different drives & such, yadda yadda. I'm sure you've heard it. I've done a lot of talking to people trying to figure this out... & I like to think there is another reason. BECAUSE, if I marry someone, I want to marry someone of the same species as me. I don't want to marry someone who is solely driven by biology... like a bull, a dog... a lizard.... I want to be with someone who can think.... a human being, not an animal. I just can't believe that men are incapable of being human! They're human by definition! There is a brain in there, & I have an unshakeable faith that the brain could be utilized instead of this whole mess being solely the result of old primal Cro-Mag type drives. Biology generally makes sense, and this doesn't. It cannot possibly be that no man ever uses logic in this area. I just can't believe it. I know there have to be some male Spock-like creatures out there.

My idea is that biology is an excuse, but not the real reason people act this way. And so, I talked to a lot of NT's... women... men... lots of people really. I just asked why they did this & why they thought other people did. Their answers really didn't have much to do with biology at all, but it always came down to self-esteem & social perceptions, generally worked out on a subconscious level that they didn't even understand until after quite a lot of talking.

I intend no offense if I am wrong, because I know there are exceptions, but this is my working theory. Honestly, I only know one male with Asperger's & would never talk about this kind of thing with him. I'm pretty sure he'd be mortified. I like to think at least some males with Asperger's might show a superior trait here, but I don't know.

It seems to me that the majority of men have very low self-esteem. If you do not provide them with a "chase," then your belief they are worthy of you renders you unworthy to them. They WANT to prove themselves to you, to demonstrate they are worthy of your time. That's why they might talk about a bunch of weird stuff you don't care about, like how much money they make, what kind of car they drive, how important everybody thinks they are at their offices, or that they used to date a model. They very much want you to not like them at first so they can talk about themselves a lot... Then, you like them for something they've achieved perhaps instead of for their personality or character. And, they seem to prefer this. They want you to not like them & go for guys who they think are above them physically, economically, intellectually, etc. so that winning you is this HUGE accomplishment, too. Then, you are more of a prize, maybe. And, then, your presence in his life can be more of a boost to this failing self-esteem he has. (Remember, NT's often get their self-esteem from without instead of within! I don't know why, but they do.)

I had an NT friend... a major extravert... explain to me that I live in a different degree of consciousness than most people do, that there isn't a subconscious in me at all (which is true). I know what I know. I do what I do. I know why I do what I do. He explains it like this... NT's usually have NO idea why they are doing what they are doing or why they feel a certain way... So, they kind of just react to their stimuli by instinct, maybe... not even intuitively, really. They don't even know if or why they like you... But lots of NT guys are interested enough in sex to romance you to some extent either way, just to see what will happen. During this period, you are supposed to get them to subconsciously like you by somehow playing hard to get without completely losing interest in them. Please let me know if you figure that one out! haha

IMPORTANT: If you are physical, there's a double standard, so if you want someone to care about you, please don't go there for a very, very, very long time & make sure there's some kind of commitment. It doesn't matter what someone says. People lie a lot. Just wait! :)




[i]



Last edited by fallingandlaughing on 02 Jun 2013, 6:02 am, edited 2 times in total.

Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

31 May 2013, 8:39 am

hurtloam wrote:
As I woman I think, "maybe I shouldn't have tried to step outside the box."


If you were male, you could instead get the impression that you shouldn’t have asked anyone out, because dating simply is not for you, and that you should have known it in advance. Sometimes you are even given this message quite explicitly. In both cases, accepting such ideas is self-defeating.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.