Look out! It's a Nice Guy! DESTROY HIM!!

Page 4 of 25 [ 392 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 25  Next

Vectorspace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 903
Location: Germany

25 Jul 2013, 8:48 am

Greb wrote:
Vectorspace wrote:
Oh well...

I know a girl who has been beaten by her boyfriend a number of times, but instead of dumping him, she is moving in with him now. You could argue that there are dozens of "nice guys" around who would never do that to her – but neither does her teddy bear.

But neither her teddy bear nor the "nice guys" are actually attractive to her. Her boyfriend is, so she choses him.


Yeap. And that's OK. Everyone is free. The problem appears when:

(1) To justifiy from an intelectual point of view her emotional choice, she needs to depreciate someway the guys around.

(2) Besides that, to avoid, from the same intelectual point of view, the consequences of her choice (she's beaten) she has to blame those guys around, as a part of a 'patriarchal' conspiracy. So those guys around, who didn't beat her and didn't have any decision making authority over her choices, suddenly they're responsible of her abuse.

Not nice.

I don't understand what you said. Why does she depreciate other guys?

Though I feel sorry for her being beaten and I really think she doesn't deserve this, I have no right to stop her from seeing him. They have already split up a number of times "for good", but something about him is apparently so attractive that she has always come back.



oppositedirection
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 515

25 Jul 2013, 8:51 am

BlackSabre7 wrote:
Do we like to earn someones love, and don't value it if it comes too easily?
Do we feel hurt by the abuse and just automatically go to the usual source of love, for comfort, even if it comes from the same source as the abuse?
Do we have trouble believing that someone we care for hurt us, so keep trying to win them over to show we were not stupid to love them in the first place?


It was an interesting video but highly theoretical based on little evidence. Also, whatever truth it may have you can't reduce every woman down to this simple explanation, so it's an open question if it applies to 5% or 50% of women. By contrast, I think what blackSabre says is a far more reliable explanation of why people (male and female) stay with far from ideal people.

This partially also explains the appeal of mean guys. As much as confidence is important, some of my female friends have told me they don't like it when a man takes too much interest at the initial step, rather she prefers when she has to make effort to win him over. Affection is more valuable when earned rather than simply given. Nice guy is already giving the affection whereas mean guy needs winning over. This may explain the preference for mean guys in some women.


_________________
'An ideal of total self-sufficiency. That secret smile may be the Buddha's but it is monstrous seen on a baby's face. To conquer craving is indeed to conquer pain, but humanity goes with it. That my autistic daughter wanted nothing was worst of all.' Park


Shatbat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet

25 Jul 2013, 8:52 am

I just wish the people who do these kind of videos were so kind as to include a written version of them. They talk too slow, and my attention wanders. And such arguments are easier to follow in written form as well. I'll try to listen to this one now


_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill


Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

25 Jul 2013, 9:01 am

Shau: Your confidence thing has a point. But there was something in yours that I already covered - bad boys, even jerks or sometimes criminals - they are good at something and it is both obvious and attractive to women. Even if their only claim is that they are good at being confident. Or at least faking it well enough to fool a fair amount of women.

The same thing doesn't work for "niceness". It's not overtly obvious right away, and for many women it is a given, so they don't always consider it something of value. Sometimes it takes a lifetime of learning the hard way that before they learn to value it. You can argue to the end of time that "niceness" should attract women sexually, but well (results anyone?) - niceness only becomes a plus in relationships and they have to be attracted enough first to get into one of those.

And Greb your version of history is pretty damn skewed. Only applicable since agriculture and humans have been around a lot longer than that.

Assuming your example of nice girl meets nice boy - so what? It doesn't mean either will be attracted to each other. It doesn't mean they are compatible long term. They can still be pretty equal over and not be attracted to each other at all or have any long term potential. What makes for the initial attract and what makes for a good long term partner are different thing - getting that balance right in terms of both is something that many people struggle with.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Last edited by Kjas on 25 Jul 2013, 9:10 am, edited 5 times in total.

Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

25 Jul 2013, 9:04 am

Shau wrote:
Laymasterflex wrote:
Being nice isn't the problem. It's being a doormat that is and helping others before you help yourself. I'm working on this too


Boo, Kjas, Greb, and the others here...you guys really don't get it. Not at all. This guy nailed it right from the beginning. Let me spell it out:

Dickhead + Confident = Laid.
Nice Guy + Confident = Laid.

Dickhead + Wussbag = Virgin.
Nice Guy + Wussbag = Virgin.

That's it. That's it, right there. The only exceptions are where the ladder two manage to score something from the bottom of the barrel.

We've all seen the sexy as*hole that pumps and dumps any girl he can get his hand on (plenty of them). We've all seen the charismatic, fun, smooth-talking loverboy (They're honestly the cream of the crop). We've all seen the bitter, misogynistic losers (that no woman in her right mind would touch with a 20 foot pole). Lastly, that sweet, kind, caring guy that couldn't protect his woman if his life depended on it (even if it was ANOTHER WOMAN threatening her).

That's it, boys and girls. That's the secret. Be strong, and you'll surely have no issues nailing at LEAST a plain Jane.


"Being nice isn't the problem. It's being a doormat that is and helping others before you help yourself. I'm working on this too

Boo, Kjas, Greb, and the others here...you guys really don't get it. Not at all. This guy nailed it right from the beginning. Let me spell it out:

Dickhead + physical sexy = relationship
Nice Girl + physical sexy = relationship

Dickhead + not sexy = Single
Nice Girl + not sexy = Single

That's it. That's it, right there. The only exceptions are where the ladder two manage to score something from the bottom of the barrel.

We've all seen the sexy as*hole that pumps and dumps any boy she can get her hand on (plenty of them). We've all seen the charismatic, fun, smooth-talking lovergirl (They're honestly the cream of the crop). We've all seen the bitter, misogynistic losers (that no man in her right mind would touch with a 20 foot pole). Lastly, that sweet, kind, caring girl that couldn't match up with another girl, if her life depended on it (even if it was ANOTHER Guy threatening her).

That's it, boys and girls. That's the secret. Be sexy, and you'll surely have no issues getting a ring from at LEAST a plain Joe."

Grats to realize something that even teenagers already know. The question is: What the hell do you do, when you simply dont want a partner, that is not only interested in your high heels, just like you may not want a girl that is only interested in you being her "Ugha-Alpha-male-protector"?

Because thats the real problem if you are interested in more then finding someone, that is not into your personality.



Shatbat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet

25 Jul 2013, 9:13 am

spongy wrote:
Its 30 minutes long but its worth a listen imo.

For anyone with some sort of attention deficit disorder:
A) Girlwriteswhat presents the way nice guys are attacked by feminists/society using several feminist articles to do so
B) Girlwriteswhat presents the way "nice girls"(same situation and behaviours, just opposite gender), whenever present, are treated in a much nicer way using several representations on the media and how the viewer is supposed to feel towards the characters(no articles on "nice girls" as far as I know)

In my own experience she has a point but I could be wrong.


THANK YOU

I think I do have some sort of attention deficit disorder :lol: I'll skip to point B


_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill


Greb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 May 2012
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 964
Location: Under the sea [level]

25 Jul 2013, 9:43 am

Schneekugel wrote:
You wrote that you dont want them to be individuals with each woman deciding on her own what she wants, so causing a world with womans that want to be free, womans that want to be valuable objects, woman that want to be a middle point....but you wanted one with woman deciding to be clone troopers, that decided them to want only a certain thing.

If you were talking about woman wanting all of that, then you simply wrote something not being true, because the two hours ago I was on the toilette, I certainly still was a woman, and I am not interested in being a middle point. There maybe some few, that want all of that, just as there are men that one to be the great home rulers, while on the other side they want to be taken care of like little boys, and so and so on... But thats certainly not all men, and accepting men to be individuals also means to accept such men existing. Luckily not more then that, so you are not forced to have relationship with such persons. If you dont like woman that want all of "free, valuable objects, or a middle point" then, simply dont go for them. There are lots of others, that have choosen other things, because of them being individuals.


Don't make up things and don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say such a thing.

Schneekugel wrote:
Quote:
Traditionally women were valuable because they were women. But now, well, now we're equal. So what exactly a woman offers in exchange?
Only the same thing that men can offer: The person that they are and being a mate to your opposite. Nothing more and still more worth then every gold in the world for the right person. :)


This is saying nothing. Obviously what is offered is the other person. What you do expect to be offered? Horses?

Dear god, this is like asking 'hey, how much is that?' and getting the answer 'money'...

Kjas wrote:
And Greb your version of history is pretty damn skewed. Only applicable since agriculture and humans have been around a lot longer than that.


I suppose you're talking about this 'And that's OK, you know, asking is OK. But if you want to ask, you have to give something in exchange. And you to give something that has the same value. Traditionally women were valuable because they were women. But now, well, now we're equal. So what exactly a woman offers in exchange?'. Just guessing since you don't quote.

So well. Fine. But women have been marrying up during whole history. So, if not what I said, which was the source of added value?

Kjas wrote:
Assuming your example of nice girl meets nice boy - so what? It doesn't mean either will be attracted to each other. It doesn't mean they are compatible long term. They can still be pretty equal over and not be attracted to each other at all or have any long term potential. What makes for the initial attract and what makes for a good long term partner are different thing - getting that balance right in terms of both is something that many people struggle with.


So it means that a nice girl rarely goes out with a nice guy that is a her same level.


_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,043
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

25 Jul 2013, 9:52 am

Greb wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Shau wrote:
Laymasterflex wrote:
Being nice isn't the problem. It's being a doormat that is and helping others before you help yourself. I'm working on this too


Boo, Kjas, Greb, and the others here...you guys really don't get it. Not at all. This guy nailed it right from the beginning. Let me spell it out:

Dickhead + Confident = Laid.
Nice Guy + Confident = Laid.

Dickhead + Wussbag = Virgin.
Nice Guy + Wussbag = Virgin.

That's it. That's it, right there. The only exceptions are where the ladder two manage to score something from the bottom of the barrel.

We've all seen the sexy as*hole that pumps and dumps any girl he can get his hand on (plenty of them). We've all seen the charismatic, fun, smooth-talking loverboy (They're honestly the cream of the crop). We've all seen the bitter, misogynistic losers (that no woman in her right mind would touch with a 20 foot pole). Lastly, that sweet, kind, caring guy that couldn't protect his woman if his life depended on it (even if it was ANOTHER WOMAN threatening her).

That's it, boys and girls. That's the secret. Be strong, and you'll surely have no issues nailing at LEAST a plain Jane.


but I do agree with that guy.


Yeap. Of course he's right. He's not discovering America.

But it's not only that. It's about being decent, and having ambitions, and purposes, and skills, and some social success, and so, and so.

And that's OK, you know, asking is OK. But if you want to ask, you have to give something in exchange. And you to give something that has the same value. Traditionally women were valuable because they were women. But now, well, now we're equal. So what exactly a woman offers in exchange?



Things didn't change much regarding this: When wars errupt, you can see how much more valuable women are in the eyes of govs - lower class men are the most expendible group.



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

25 Jul 2013, 9:53 am

Greb wrote:
So it means that a nice girl rarely goes out with a nice guy that is a her same level.


He won't go out with her just because she's "nice". Nice in a girl is not sexually attractive (again - nice is only valuable in a relationship). Looks are.
She has to be good looking enough first. You conveniently forget that.

I actually do know guys who are you typical nice guys and know nice girls and they don't date each other, despite all other major things being mostly equal. The girls don't date the guys because as Shau like to call it, they are not confident enough. And the guys do not date the girls because they are not pretty enough.

Again, sexual attraction and relationship stuff are different. If you don't have the first then you never get to the second.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,790
Location: Stendec

25 Jul 2013, 9:55 am

Kjas wrote:
Let's be honest.

Women have no problem with men who are genuinely decent people.

They have a problem with 2 things:
a) Guys who feel they deserve, are entitled to, or have a victim attitude about things, especially about women

Guys who whine and complain around women will never be popular with women.

Kjas wrote:
b) Guys who lack purpose, clarity, and depth; who aren't great at something and don't have something to give to the world and live it and don't have something to show for it.

If a guy wants women to be interested in him then he should first be interesting. "Nice Guys" aren't interesting - they're boring. Nice guys who play a musical instrument, have an education and a job, who live on their own, and who can stand up for themselves (and others) are interesting.

Kjas wrote:
Now if you are both A and B, well then yes, you are well and truly screwed.

If a man whines and complains about how he can't get a date because girls aren't interested in him, and does nothing about it, has only screwed himself.



1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

25 Jul 2013, 9:57 am

auntblabby wrote:
for 99.99% of my life, being "friendzoned" would've been a huge promotion.


Yep, so foreveralone I can't even get friendzoned. Yay having empathy score of 14 so girls cannot communicate with me.



BlackSabre7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia

25 Jul 2013, 10:00 am

MCalavera wrote:
I'm sure you're a genuinely nice person, but from what I gather from your post, you had guys wanting you. You just didn't like any of them back in that way.

Nice guys usually don't have any girl pursuing them, although this is not always the case.

I think the closest female "equivalent" to the nice guy would be a physically unattractive girl who desires a relationship but is unsuccessful because guys are generally repulsed by something physical about her (whether it's extremely obese weight or deformed face with no hint of prettiness on it or ... )

A nice but pretty girl with nothing else going for her has more chances of being with someone romantically/sexually than a nice guy with good looks but nothing else going for him.


I have to admit that I am not typical. Guys did try but could not cross the boundary that I now know came from autism. Nice guys were too quick to give up. My husband only succeeded because he was too thick to realize he was not reaching me so did not quit, and I eventually allowed things to progress to see what would happen, not because I felt anything.
But I would have liked a nice guy. I do not care for nasty, or cool or any of that crap. I do not care for material possessions. What I have now is a nightmare.

I disagree with you that a guy's looks won't get him anywhere. Good-looking guys will always get laid. Yes, confidence is extremely important in general, but all girls talk about is how cute guys are, regardless of any of their circumstances. The reason is that young girls have a tendency of romanticizing the hell out of whatever they see in a guy. They first fall in love based on his looks, then construct a dreamworld about what they think life would be like with them. There is a good chance that many nice guys who think girls don't like them have had girls crush on them but never realized it. I has crushes on almost every single boy I went to school with up to high school, and the majority in Uni. (lasting from a few days to a few years)

A guys behaviour makes all the difference - much more so than anything else (except if he stinks, nothing can save him but a good shower).



BlackSabre7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia

25 Jul 2013, 10:16 am

I think there is another important factor. If nice girls or guys come across as too mature and serious, they may look like they are looking for a permanent relationship, even if they are not. This might scare off a lot of people who want to have fun or not feel like they are being hooked and reeled in. I don't think many people want want to feel pressured into anything. Finding someone is already a minefield, it is better if it feels natural.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

25 Jul 2013, 10:17 am

Kjas wrote:
Greb wrote:
So it means that a nice girl rarely goes out with a nice guy that is a her same level.


He won't go out with her just because she's "nice". Nice in a girl is not sexually attractive (again - nice is only valuable in a relationship). Looks are.
She has to be good looking enough first. You conveniently forget that.

I actually do know guys who are you typical nice guys and know nice girls and they don't date each other, despite all other major things being mostly equal. The girls don't date the guys because as Shau like to call it, they are not confident enough. And the guys do not date the girls because they are not pretty enough.

Again, sexual attraction and relationship stuff are different. If you don't have the first then you never get to the second.


Actually, I beg to differ. For many guys, genuinely "nice" in a girl is romantically/sexually attractive. Typically speaking, it goes as follows:

Guy meets genuinely nice girl who isn't physically unattractive but nothing else going for her => Guy sees girl as relationship material

Girl meets genuinely nice guy who isn't physically unattractive but has nothing much going for him => Girl sees guy as good friend



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

25 Jul 2013, 10:22 am

^^^
Again - looks and confidence do not hold the same weight for the other.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 164
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

25 Jul 2013, 10:22 am

BlackSabre7 wrote:
I get used, left out, taken advantage of, robbed, walked all over etc. I stupidly don't change the nice persona because I choose not to.


This has nothing to do with you being nice. Nice and spineless are not the same thing. You're nice, and you're also spineless, and that's why you get used and walked over.

Quote:
The slu*ty girls, and the confidant, pretty girls got them.


Nice and confident go together fantastically as a guy. Give it a shot as a girl and lemme know how it works out.

Quote:
Thing is, this 'nice' problem goes both ways.


Replace "nice" with "spineless" and you're onto it, sister.

Quote:
There is a thing called the 'self verification theory', which states that you are attracted to people that verify what you already think of yourself.


Quote:
See, now that I am married to an abusive man, I would kill for a nice, boring, predictable, church-going daggy accountant.


So you know the stove is hot...and you've burned your hand on the stove before...and you keep putting your hand on the stove...