article on the difference between wanting and entitlement

Page 4 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Aaendi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 363

20 Nov 2015, 11:15 am

You know what I just realized? How is it a man's fault for not getting laid, if nothing a man does can earn him sex anyway, and it's all random?



Pineapplejuicex
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 19 Nov 2015
Age: 41
Posts: 72

20 Nov 2015, 11:17 am

Aaendi wrote:
You know what I just realized? How is it a man's fault for not getting laid, if nothing a man does can earn him sex anyway, and it's all random?



Sex isn't earned, per se, but it isn't exactly random either.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,991
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

20 Nov 2015, 12:55 pm

Pineapplejuicex wrote:
Aaendi wrote:
You know what I just realized? How is it a man's fault for not getting laid, if nothing a man does can earn him sex anyway, and it's all random?



Sex isn't earned, per se, but it isn't exactly random either.


Yes I wonder where the impression females see sex as a reward to give males if they 'earn' it comes from. I never see it quite like that. With being in a relationship if me and my boyfriend happen to get into the mood then we have sex, there is not a list of things he has to do to 'earn' it and I don't have a set of reasons to 'withhold' it.

As for when I wasn't in a relationship I wasn't thinking....'who is going to earn sex from me', at that point I was hoping to get a relationship that would include sex....of course due to jumping in too quick there was sexual encounters that didn't turn into real relationships much of the time.


_________________
We won't go back.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

20 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Pineapplejuicex wrote:
Aaendi wrote:
You know what I just realized? How is it a man's fault for not getting laid, if nothing a man does can earn him sex anyway, and it's all random?



Sex isn't earned, per se, but it isn't exactly random either.


Yes I wonder where the impression females see sex as a reward to give males if they 'earn' it comes from. I never see it quite like that. With being in a relationship if me and my boyfriend happen to get into the mood then we have sex, there is not a list of things he has to do to 'earn' it and I don't have a set of reasons to 'withhold' it.

As for when I wasn't in a relationship I wasn't thinking....'who is going to earn sex from me', at that point I was hoping to get a relationship that would include sex....of course due to jumping in too quick there was sexual encounters that didn't turn into real relationships much of the time.


But your not a average nt female as you stated before. It comes from nt females who use sex as a reward or barging tool.
She wants a chair , he does, if he gets the one she wants he'll get sex if not, she'll deny him sex for a while.

Wrong as it is it's quite common from what I hear. Common doesn't mean everyone does it , doesn't mean we say you'll do it. People get power over another, lots of people wil abuse the power, but not everyone will. Sex can be great power over men. Men who want sex are less likely to take actions that will lead to it being denied.

If you were in a desert and the person who controlled whether you got water or not wanted you to do stuff would you go against that and not get water or do what they say and get water.

Being in the dog house often is punished by no sex. So if sex is punishment it's also the reward for good behavior. I don't like that it is that way, sex should jus be for both people and shouldn't be used as reward/punishment. Though I don't expect women to have sex when angry at their bfs unless they horny I guess. I've heard some people have angry sex.

I think it's a pother hold over from earlier times when men had all the money and women couldn't work. She could use sex to get her way. Now it's just a power that one side doesn't want to give up.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

20 Nov 2015, 1:47 pm

sly279 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pineapplejuicex wrote:
Aaendi wrote:
You know what I just realized? How is it a man's fault for not getting laid, if nothing a man does can earn him sex anyway, and it's all random?



Sex isn't earned, per se, but it isn't exactly random either.


Yes I wonder where the impression females see sex as a reward to give males if they 'earn' it comes from. I never see it quite like that. With being in a relationship if me and my boyfriend happen to get into the mood then we have sex, there is not a list of things he has to do to 'earn' it and I don't have a set of reasons to 'withhold' it.

As for when I wasn't in a relationship I wasn't thinking....'who is going to earn sex from me', at that point I was hoping to get a relationship that would include sex....of course due to jumping in too quick there was sexual encounters that didn't turn into real relationships much of the time.


But your not a average nt female as you stated before. It comes from nt females who use sex as a reward or barging tool.
She wants a chair , he does, if he gets the one she wants he'll get sex if not, she'll deny him sex for a while.

Wrong as it is it's quite common from what I hear. Common doesn't mean everyone does it , doesn't mean we say you'll do it. People get power over another, lots of people wil abuse the power, but not everyone will. Sex can be great power over men. Men who want sex are less likely to take actions that will lead to it being denied.

If you were in a desert and the person who controlled whether you got water or not wanted you to do stuff would you go against that and not get water or do what they say and get water.

Being in the dog house often is punished by no sex. So if sex is punishment it's also the reward for good behavior. I don't like that it is that way, sex should jus be for both people and shouldn't be used as reward/punishment. Though I don't expect women to have sex when angry at their bfs unless they horny I guess. I've heard some people have angry sex.

I think it's a pother hold over from earlier times when men had all the money and women couldn't work. She could use sex to get her way. Now it's just a power that one side doesn't want to give up.

That would be a dysfunctional relationship though. Sex in a real relationships doesn't work like that.

Also, the issue isn't that women are choosy in order to have power over men. I think a lot of women just aren't sexually attracted to a person they hardly know. You have to get to know a girl and develop intimacy and then she will want sex with you.



The Grand Inquisitor
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,765

20 Nov 2015, 9:42 pm

Unfortunate_Aspie_ wrote:
Outrider wrote:
LeelaLeela:

What about the guy who is doing all the right things to be as physically and mentally attractive as possible, but is still failing and is simply venting his frustrations (which is healthy as not only do human beings feel these emotions but it's better than bottling it up).

Imho:

Entitled = I deserve women no matter what.

Not entitled = I'm doing all the right things, but still not seeing any results. It's not women's fault, and I'm not angry at those that are considered 'less attractive' by social/cultural standards, but just frustrated.

Thing is, it takes time, dedication, effort and money not just in relationships, but life in general. And if you use all these things in your life and still find no results, it's natural to feel frustrated.

Compare getting a relationship to getting a job.

Entitled = I deserve a job no matter what. Even if I don't have the right qualification I am an extremely friendly person so the job should be mine.

Not entitled = I work hard, I have the correct degree, I have the necessary skills required for the job, I'm extremely friendly and easy to work with, I respect authority, etc. yet I still don't have the job. I've applied to many, many places in my field and yet it's been two years.

People have every right to feel angry or frustrated over lack of success sometimes.

So, a successful social life is earned by being a nice, good and interesting, positive person? Well, some of us are all of those things, yet we still have a tiny number of friends while a large number of 'a55høles' congregate together and are all magnetized to each other.

My ex-girlfriend is a wonderful example. She was extremely selfish, over-dramatic, would always take things the wrong way, extremely aggressive, and overall an absolutely hateable person. Yet me, a caring, kind, compassionate guy she was the best I could do, and yet she manages to get a new boyfriend/relationship (a 21 year old in fact) 3 DAYS after we broke up.

Should I really never ever feel annoyed bullsh*t like this happens in the world? Do I feel entitled to a woman/happy relationship? No, not at all. But when any old deadbeat criminal thief hobo redneck bogan grubby drug-addict G.I. skinny man can go through dozens of good relationships while even the most attractive of aspies can't, then there's clearly a problem here.

Maybe it's just 'life is unfair'. Though the world doesn't become more fair if we just ignore the issue and continue to live a life being treated unfairly. Life is unfair, sure, but whoeever said we can't MAKE it fair? And how do we do that?

By consistently deciding to be polite, helpful, kind, selfess, considerate, compassionate people in this world that tolerate and care for others.

I completely agree with Marshall on this one. Life's unfair and that sucks, and it's the reason why some people are so happy through no effort while other people who really are trying are so miserable.

Instead of criticizing people who complain life is unfair and basically telling them to shut up, why don't we give them some constructive criticism - by asking them 'Life's unfair, but what are YOU going to DO about it?'

Once more people learn to do this, perhaps the world would be a much better place.


One caveat I would say would be that a relationship isn't a goal or your job it isn't something you "accomplish" it is a mutual undertaking between two individuals who can hopefully learn and grow together. So, basically I don't think they are comparable. *end cheesy rant*

And, it IS a shame that AS peeps have a hell of a time (myself included) getting into relationships, but it's a part of the larger picture in that AS is considered a disability/disorder/sickness/whatever for a reason.
I don't agree with this, but it is and it does make things a lot harder. :(
I'm not sure what else there is to say about it really- like there aren't many solutions other than to keep on tryin'.
I mean what else can a person possibly do? Nothing IMHO.


I really like Outrider's analogy, and I would have to disagree with your counter here. There are lots of parallels I can see between looking for a relationship (especially as a male) and looking for a job. When looking for either, your prospects are much higher if you're as fit a candidate as possible, and if your qualifications don't match the demands, you're either going to go job/relationshipless or you're going to have to settle for what you can get. You're going to be somewhat bitter if you see people you deem to be less qualified than you taking a job you wanted/person you wanted to be with. If you can't get either no matter how hard you try, you're going to be frustrated.

You say that a relationship is not a goal. If that were true, dating websites would be going out of business. You also describe a relationship as a mutual undertaking between two individuals. Sure, that's true, but I would make the case that a job interviewee landing a job at a company benefits both the brand new employee, and their employer. It too is a mutual undertaking of sorts between employer and employee, aligning their goals and forging a mutually beneficial relationship.

So yeah, the differences between the two notions do not undermine the similarities.



Pineapplejuicex
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 19 Nov 2015
Age: 41
Posts: 72

22 Nov 2015, 2:39 am

sly279 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Pineapplejuicex wrote:
Aaendi wrote:
You know what I just realized? How is it a man's fault for not getting laid, if nothing a man does can earn him sex anyway, and it's all random?



Sex isn't earned, per se, but it isn't exactly random either.


Yes I wonder where the impression females see sex as a reward to give males if they 'earn' it comes from. I never see it quite like that. With being in a relationship if me and my boyfriend happen to get into the mood then we have sex, there is not a list of things he has to do to 'earn' it and I don't have a set of reasons to 'withhold' it.

As for when I wasn't in a relationship I wasn't thinking....'who is going to earn sex from me', at that point I was hoping to get a relationship that would include sex....of course due to jumping in too quick there was sexual encounters that didn't turn into real relationships much of the time.


But your not a average nt female as you stated before. It comes from nt females who use sex as a reward or barging tool.
She wants a chair , he does, if he gets the one she wants he'll get sex if not, she'll deny him sex for a while.

Wrong as it is it's quite common from what I hear. Common doesn't mean everyone does it , doesn't mean we say you'll do it. People get power over another, lots of people wil abuse the power, but not everyone will. Sex can be great power over men. Men who want sex are less likely to take actions that will lead to it being denied.

If you were in a desert and the person who controlled whether you got water or not wanted you to do stuff would you go against that and not get water or do what they say and get water.

Being in the dog house often is punished by no sex. So if sex is punishment it's also the reward for good behavior. I don't like that it is that way, sex should jus be for both people and shouldn't be used as reward/punishment. Though I don't expect women to have sex when angry at their bfs unless they horny I guess. I've heard some people have angry sex.

I think it's a pother hold over from earlier times when men had all the money and women couldn't work. She could use sex to get her way. Now it's just a power that one side doesn't want to give up.


Sex-as-commodity-exchange is gross and totally a sign of a dysfunctional relationship. I have sex with me boyfriend because it's fun and I want to and he does too. We were together a month or so before we had sex (met online, didn't know him well enough to wanna sleep with him before then. Didn't sleep with him in exchange for anything).

Have you ever been in the sex doghouse? If not, have you considered that a man (or woman) who is upset with their partner and isn't in the mood for sex is upset and not in the mood for sex right then , as opposed to denying said partner sex as a deranged attempt at resource extraction? Or just not in the mood for another reason, like stress or exhaustion, that night?

Last but not least, the sex-for-chairs example doesn't really hold up in the modern era as for it to work, it'd require:
1. The man not getting being able to get sex from anybody else (Tinder, hooker, colleague on business trip)
2. The woman not being able to get a chair without the man's money (No money of her own, sale at Walmart, super-cheap used expensive chair that she wants on eBay, etc).

Strange, strange ideas you've got about women that aren't really reality-based.