Serious issues with L&D Forum

Page 4 of 30 [ 473 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 30  Next

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 May 2016, 6:17 pm

I agree. Opinions are just that....opinions.

They should be presented as such.

There should be qualifiers: "I believe....", or "It seems to me......" or "Based upon my observation....." inserted into opinions which could cause conflict.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 May 2016, 6:19 pm

Sabreclaw wrote:
The problem is that when you have people that are desperately lonely and sexually frustrated for a very long period of time they're inevitably going to get all sorts of strange ideas into their heads. Even if it's sub-consciously.

They're going to need an alternative explanation as to why they're single than just "you suck". So that's when you start seeing reasoning like "all women want is wealth" and "all men want is a supermodel". And of course, they'll focus on the small minority that genuinely feels that way in ignore all the people who aren't shallow, again, probably without even realizing it.

I see two possible solutions.
1. Find every lonely person a suitable partner.
2. Preemptively ban everyone who's lonely just to make sure nobody bitter shows up.

See I've never ever said women go after wealth men

Said the women against me have said they want a fhad finically stable men

I am and never will be considered facially stable.

I am however misty finically reponsible. I live within my means

Could we please not turn this into a attack Sly thread :(



Last edited by sly279 on 05 May 2016, 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

waynet7
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2015
Age: 50
Posts: 108
Location: Illinois

05 May 2016, 6:20 pm

Ultimately, I don't think it is possible to stop disparaging generalizations. The most practical response may be for users to 'police themselves', and avoid responding to such threads or gently remind the posters that their statement(s) might be offensive to folks. Perhaps a 'rotten tomato' button can be made available that will allow readers to rate posts anonymously? A certain amount of rotten tomatoes and the post is removed? The point being to encourage the poster to think about why folks are objecting, and anonymous in order to prevent retaliatory posts that may not be warranted.


_________________
"You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Mahatma Gandhi


Last edited by waynet7 on 05 May 2016, 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 May 2016, 6:22 pm

If somebody says they don't want to talk to you, you have to stop talking to them. That's what I mean.

If somebody sees "let's agree to disagree," this means they don't want to argue any more. And that should be respected.

I actually believe that debate and discussions is conducive to the growth of all persons.



Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

05 May 2016, 6:22 pm

sly279 wrote:
See I've never ever said women go after wealth men

Sad the women against me have said they want a fhad finically stable men

I am and never will be considered facially stable.

I am however misty finically reponsible. I live within my means


I'm not talking specifically here, I'm being general. That's why I said "people" and that's why I said "reasoning like".



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 May 2016, 6:24 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
If somebody says they don't want to talk to you, you have to stop talking to them. That's what I mean.

If somebody sees "let's agree to disagree," this means they don't want to argue any more. And that should be respected.

I actually believe that debate and discussions is conducive to the growth of all persons.


That only works if that person stops taking to you too. They can't say stop taking to me then post stuff towards that user and get mad when they reply

Iced tried the let's agree to disagree but doesn't seem like us aspies are good at accepting that. We like to have he last word.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

05 May 2016, 6:26 pm

Sabreclaw wrote:
sly279 wrote:
See I've never ever said women go after wealth men

Sad the women against me have said they want a fhad finically stable men

I am and never will be considered facially stable.

I am however misty finically reponsible. I live within my means


I'm not talking specifically here, I'm being general. That's why I said "people" and that's why I said "reasoning like".


Just seems like most the posts are hinting at me or directly saying its me
:(



Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

05 May 2016, 6:29 pm

sly279 wrote:
Sabreclaw wrote:
sly279 wrote:
See I've never ever said women go after wealth men

Sad the women against me have said they want a fhad finically stable men

I am and never will be considered facially stable.

I am however misty finically reponsible. I live within my means


I'm not talking specifically here, I'm being general. That's why I said "people" and that's why I said "reasoning like".


Just seems like most the posts are hinting at me or directly saying its me
:(


I'm trying to be supportive and understanding of all people who are lonely. I'm not attacking anyone.



waynet7
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2015
Age: 50
Posts: 108
Location: Illinois

05 May 2016, 6:32 pm

It looks like this thread is derailing a little.


_________________
"You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Mahatma Gandhi


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 May 2016, 6:33 pm

I'm proud of you, Sly, for staying around, and discussing this with us.



TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

05 May 2016, 6:34 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I'm proud of you, Sly, for staying around, and discussing this with us.

Me, too....so can we get back to topic now? :P


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 May 2016, 6:37 pm

This IS the topic.

We have to try to discuss and argue without abusing each other personally.

We have to have slightly more stringent standards than that found in PPR.

I'm proud of Sly because he stayed around, and offered his opinion, instead of just feeling sorry for himself.

We should probably make use of the sticky found in PPR pertaining to the Forum Rules. But make it slightly more stringent, like I said, than PPR.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 May 2016, 6:41 pm

As a general guideline for this forum and contentious issues generally, this principle adds value:

When what you are doing isn’t working, avoid doing more of it with greater intensity. 



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 May 2016, 6:52 pm

I think we should have a lively ongoing debate--but I think we should respect each other as people.

If we are restricted from having that lively debate, we don't learn much.

We are people of intelligence. We have opinions. Sometimes, they don't agree with other opinions. That's part of life.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 May 2016, 6:55 pm

I hope there will be a focus on solutions in this thread - we are all very aware of what the problems are.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 May 2016, 7:02 pm

One solution, I believe, would be to place a sticky, similar to the one within PPR, within L & D.

The wording should be changed somewhat in order to make it somewhat more stringent than PPR, though not as restrictive as the Haven.

Somebody else offered another solution: If somebody wants to "rant," they should go to the "random" Subforum, and "rant" under either "rants" or "raves."