The male body stereotypes?
It's so wrong, why do they feel the need to carve parts off a babies penis?
I cannot get my head around it, who thought this was a good idea?
21st century and we do this and try to justify it, I will never understand this and I don't wish to.
I think it's a ret*d practice.
And It was done to me before as newborn, I feel angry when I think about it.
Oddly it's usually females who support and push it and males that oppose it or go along with what their wife wants.
It's happen so long it's become socially acceptable doesn't make it right. Just like deforming girls feet in China to make them smaller happen for thousands of years and was socially acceptable. Imagine hundred years from now the female mutuilation could be socially acceptable and people
Will argue in its support as a needed practice.
Also remember women not too long ago it was science that women shouldn't orgasm and would get schock therapy. Men with foreskin get more pleasure. You're permanently removing like 20,000-70,000 never endings that according to atheist evolution added. The foreskin protects the penis. Just wash your penis.
the preferable penis size differs between cultures actually. The ancient greeks thought small penises were great. and instead larger penis sizes were seen as funny or even barbaric for example
About circumsicion well as far as i know - which is not really that much - children around the globe are being brainwashed about it. Sometimes it might be used for medical reasons , but i do think the practice should be banned or somehow prohibited at least for children. Great now i will read the wikipedia article about it
Seriously i don't think most people care, it is genitalia after all and it has to be a little ugly,we can't help it . If a partner turns you down and cites those things as reasons I' d think that its just a lie to avoid any other further exlanations.
Muscle mass and fitness will make you more appealing but you won't be at risk of discrimination (workplace, healthcare, relationships )because you are not an athlete. There still lies a problem on the fitness community, people seem to confuse natural achiavable fitness and various-substance-induced fitness (as you have already stated). There's a huge drug dealing behaviour going on in gyms . As time passes opinions tend to become stricter (or more distorted) on that matter too, people spit at eachother terms like fat, overweight and obese even though they are medically fine. I consider those anti-fat people stereotypes , which are more generalised that just male body stereotypes.
Other than that the worse thing that can happen to a male, appearance-wise, is really short stature . Has there ever been a culture kind enough to accept short men , I wonder. People often address the issue as a bizzare exotic problem of asia, well in the west we surelly got our fair share .
_________________
not diagnosed
sorry for butchering the english language and obsessively re-editing my posts.
I'm naturally really skinny. Muscle mass is obviously different & tone isn't troubling me but I have to guess there's at least more than 1 'ideal' bone structure. What does unconventional athleticism count for?
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
Last edited by cberg on 03 May 2017, 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
About circumsicion well as far as i know - which is not really that much - children around the globe are being brainwashed about it. Sometimes it might be used for medical reasons , but i do think the practice should be banned or somehow prohibited at least for children. Great now i will read the wikipedia article about it
Seriously i don't think most people care, it is genitalia after all and it has to be a little ugly,we can't help it . If a partner turns you down and cites those things as reasons I' d think that its just a lie to avoid any other further exlanations.
Muscle mass and fitness will make you more appealing but you won't be at risk of discrimination (workplace, healthcare, relationships )because you are not an athlete. There still lies a problem on the fitness community, people seem to confuse natural achiavable fitness and various-substance-induced fitness (as you have already stated). There's a huge drug dealing behaviour going on in gyms . As time passes opinions tend to become stricter (or more distorted) on that matter too, people spit at eachother terms like fat, overweight and obese even though they are medically fine. I consider those anti-fat people stereotypes , which are more generalised that just male body stereotypes.
Other than that the worse thing that can happen to a male, appearance-wise, is really short stature . Has there ever been a culture kind enough to accept short men , I wonder. People often address the issue as a bizzare exotic problem of asia, well in the west we surelly got our fair share .
I'm impressed.
the look of a guy who works out at the gym is different from the look of a guy who works out doing something else (more fun and interesting).
In theory, no. Muscle mass is muscle mass, it's not like there are different kinds of muscle mass. Lifting weights is simply more effective at building it.
While I'm straight, and therefore hardly an authority on what would be appealing in the male body sex-whise, I figure that a physique born from actual labour rather than obsessive gym-sculpting should be preferrable. Hence why my current daily workout features two large water containers filled with 20 litres each, and walking. Lots and lots of walking.
Also trying the periodic fasting thing. Surprisingly easy so far.
I seem to recall there being two types of muscle fibers, though. Can't recall their techincal names, but basically a quick, explosive type and a slow but much stronger type. They vary across populations, hence why there are more Kenyans in the sprint and more Icelandics doing the Strongman thing. But I imagine you could focus on building one type over the other. Probably?
But more to Seaweeds point, unless you focus almost exclusively on the big compound excersices, you run the risk of looking disproportionate. Some guys miss all the leg days, and look weird as a result. Others just want to look good at the bar, so they're nothing but pecs and biceps. That sort of thing is less likely if you get most fo your excercise from doing manual labour, or something similar.
Symmetry does have an appeal.
_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.
Building muscle = destroying muscle & the right balance of fast twitch/endurance muscle can make anyone stronger than they appear but I'm wondering specifically about female opinions on what the thresholds might be between body types.
I guess I was also inevitably wondering if/when that constitutes an archetypical look. For one example, how much obsession do the fun sports take before they too effectively become gyms? I spent a while in high school trying that out but I get a lot more from bikes or skis. Of course I constantly hear girls are less visual & so fourth so what about exceptions to that rule?
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
Also trying the periodic fasting thing. Surprisingly easy so far.
I seem to recall there being two types of muscle fibers, though. Can't recall their techincal names, but basically a quick, explosive type and a slow but much stronger type. They vary across populations, hence why there are more Kenyans in the sprint and more Icelandics doing the Strongman thing. But I imagine you could focus on building one type over the other. Probably?
I don't get why it is preferrable though. For those of us who don't work hard labour jobs, I figure it should be preferrable to still have some muscle, at the very least for good health. And honestly, some of us actually really enjoy doing heavy lifts.
I am getting really tired of the constant projecting, just because some people hate going to the gym, doesn't mean that everyone who goes there hates it too, and only are there because they are obsessive. I personally hate playing football, but I don't make assumptions and judgements about people who play it.
There are fast twitch and slow twitch muscle fibers, but it's not a factor in how you look. There are only really two variables there, total amount of mass and total amount of body fat. For most muscle groups though, slow twitch movements will build mass more effectively.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,835
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
This is all a myth that many of you women always love to repeat. I don't buy any of it.
When for example 90% of women refuse to date men shorter than them or when the vast majority state strong preference for taller/bigger, isn't that a super strong emphasis in men's beauty imposed on men by women? It's imposed by real women , you can see them on dating sites, and not by some fashion industry like how Wolf explained about the mythical female beauty that doesn't reflect real straight men's preferences in reality.
Can you site an actual study that proves 90% of women on earth would refuse to date men shorter than them? A majority do have a preference for males taller than themselves but I say it is false claim that 90% of them would see it as a deal-breaker.
A majority of males have a preference for women shorter than them, does that mean 90% of them would refuse to date a taller woman?
_________________
We won't go back.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,034
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
This is all a myth that many of you women always love to repeat. I don't buy any of it.
When for example 90% of women refuse to date men shorter than them or when the vast majority state strong preference for taller/bigger, isn't that a super strong emphasis in men's beauty imposed on men by women? It's imposed by real women , you can see them on dating sites, and not by some fashion industry like how Wolf explained about the mythical female beauty that doesn't reflect real straight men's preferences in reality.
Can you site an actual study that proves 90% of women on earth would refuse to date men shorter than them? A majority do have a preference for males taller than themselves but I say it is false claim that 90% of them would see it as a deal-breaker.
A majority of males have a preference for women shorter than them, does that mean 90% of them would refuse to date a taller woman?
I have cited researches before showing that males do not care if women taller than them - and if anything, males don't try with taller women because we know that they will reject us, this preference is on the women side.
When it comes to height pickiness, it is your gender, not ours; 90% of people of your gender. Just accept it and stop arguing this every time, it has been proven so many times in so many studies and so many males here and on boards stated they won't mind dating taller women.
"One 2008 study of college students found that about 50 percent of guys wanted their partners to be shorter than them, while 90 percent of women wanted their partners to be taller than them"
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/do ... 1&type=pdf
"Nearly half of men indicated their tallest acceptable date could
be taller than them (24%) or their height (23%), while only half (53%) required that their
partner be shorter than them. For women, the vast majority indicated that the shortest per-
son they would date would still be taller than them (89%), with only a small minority being
willing to accept a mate who was their height (7%) or shorter (4%)."
The stereotypical shape of a man is the inverted-triangle (V-shape) body type, which is having broad shoulders and a wide chest, tapering down to a slim waist and hips.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 29 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 193 of 200
You are very likely neurotypical
The inverted triangle shape is the look of male youth and aesthetic depicted in magazines, television, and so on. I'd say it's the dominant ideal and stereotype, kind of like how the hourglass figure is for women.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 29 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 193 of 200
You are very likely neurotypical
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
New here, male |
30 Sep 2024, 9:13 pm |
New Member - Male Married to an Aspie Woman |
18 Sep 2024, 10:47 pm |
Most outrageous accusation from NTs about our body language? |
19 Aug 2024, 11:59 pm |
Wooow! This Is Fascinating! Male To Female Ratios Worldwide |
05 Sep 2024, 6:24 pm |