Bringing her kid on the first date?

Page 4 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

FunkyPunky
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 349

22 Dec 2017, 4:38 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
if you bump into her face to face just treat her like any complete stranger or a coworker you barely know, as if you barely know her. ie. if she doesn't say Good morning first then don't say Good morning first, ghost her in real life like how she ghosts you online. If you are forced to work together on some task, just keep it professional and only talk work.


No risk of that. She's in a different department in a different building on the other side of town.



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

23 Dec 2017, 4:05 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Single mothers who cycle through boyfriends I’d say are red flags in general. Personally I wouldn’t go there.


And the childless women who do so are not?


I wouldn’t go there either. But they may have the sense not to get pregnant on a whim. Unless the single mother was married or something then it didn’t work, I think it’s an insensible idea to get pregnant. There is just no legal security in it. Women who get pregnant without considering legal and financial implications seem a bit stupid. A kid isn’t just something to pop out, it’s a life changing decision which needs to be thought about harder than anything.



modernmax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,458
Location: Near Chicago

23 Dec 2017, 4:15 am

It's not really cheating if their partner knows and is okay with it, considering an important part of cheating on anything is keeping others from knowing about it.


_________________
This is not a signature, I just make a line and write this under it every time I post.


hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

23 Dec 2017, 4:17 am

Being poly isn’t cheating. They are not monogamous so manogamous view points don’t apply to them.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

23 Dec 2017, 2:22 pm

FunkyPunky wrote:
Well at first she said he (her son) might like to go get dinner with us. Then she turned around and said she never introduces her boyfriends to him until they're "serious" because he gets really torn up whenever she breaks up. So if she can't find a babysitter (and it's not looking good) then the date is off... again.


This is why the social norm is for single parents to Not introduce their kids to dates, especially first dates or hookups. Now you know. Inviting the kid along to a first date would have likely been received as very weeeeeird by her & her protective mama-bear sense may have even been activated and had her think "Why does this guy want to meet my child? Is he some kind of pedo/creep?" Maybe not, since she'd been stalling with the babysitter thing.. but possibly.

Sounds like she was using not being able to get a babysitter as an excuse not to meet you, really. Anyone with financial means can get themselves a babysitter. Maybe not on ultra short notice, but with planning? Yes. Unless she will ONLY hire one particular person or family member or something. But in general, one can hire someone to do damned near anything for the simple offering of $.

Polygamy & cheating? Cheating implies breaking rules. If polygamous rules state that it's Ok & all are aware, then there's no cheating. It may not be for you, but they're not playing by your rules, morals, or ethical code. Roll your eyes all you want but not everyone lives their sex lives like you opt to live yours & that's just a simple fact, like it or not.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Fireblossom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jan 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,577

24 Dec 2017, 7:32 am

goldfish21 wrote:
Sounds like she was using not being able to get a babysitter as an excuse not to meet you, really. Anyone with financial means can get themselves a babysitter. Maybe not on ultra short notice, but with planning? Yes. Unless she will ONLY hire one particular person or family member or something. But in general, one can hire someone to do damned near anything for the simple offering of $.


But being carefull about who she hires as a babysitter isn't a bad thing... I mean who in the world would just hire the first person available to watch after their child? That's just not safe; one should look in to things when they choose a babysitter. She might have too strict standards, sure, but when it's about a child's safety I'd say that strict standards are far better than being too carefree.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,179
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm

modernmax wrote:
It's not really cheating if their partner knows and is okay with it, considering an important part of cheating on anything is keeping others from knowing about it.



Careful, OP will be triggered by these types of comments (again).


_________________
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell