sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
05 Aug 2007, 4:41 pm
05 Aug 2007, 6:33 pm
05 Aug 2007, 8:28 pm
05 Aug 2007, 9:08 pm
05 Aug 2007, 9:20 pm
sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
05 Aug 2007, 9:29 pm
05 Aug 2007, 9:33 pm
TheMachine1
Veteran
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.
05 Aug 2007, 9:37 pm
Papillon wrote:
Today I have an altogether different perspective. Would you consider studying the book, "Drive Your Woman Wild In Bed" by Stacey Keith? Yes, the title is very catchy indeed but it is more about codes of conduct for the men then whatever is done in the bedroom.
I looked up a review on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Drive-Your-Woman- ... 0446670472
Quote:
A Disappointment, April 5, 2000 By A. Lawrence - See all my reviews
I'm convinced that some of these excellent reviews must be a marketing scheme. My impression of Keith's book is that it is primarily focused on topics that are routinely espoused in freshman level sociology courses. Which is to say, there is very little actual discussion about sex per se, and a great deal of discussion regarding social gender issues in a femminist ideological framework. The route of all sexual difficulties, implies Keith, is the dysfunctional attitudes and degrading behavior which men universally impose upon women. This supposed guide to sex and romance condecendingly preaches such sophmoric advice as not oggling other women in public and refraining from racially prejudiced humor. The recurring theme here is modern ideological/political correctness and please men learn to be more sensitive yada yada, as if the readers are men of paeleolithic barbarism sith the emotional maturity of a basket of puppies. Some sexual technique towards the final chapters focuses entirely on either licking or fingering the clitoris (duh!). One last note: watch out for the male "sexual sophistication" test; the questions are manipulated so as to classify men who are less than Keith's ideal into dysfunctional descriptions; the questions' and results' prejudice should make diciplined behavioral scientists weep for the damage "pop-psych" writing like that of Staci Keith can do to people's perceptions of sex and gender issues.
I'm convinced that some of these excellent reviews must be a marketing scheme. My impression of Keith's book is that it is primarily focused on topics that are routinely espoused in freshman level sociology courses. Which is to say, there is very little actual discussion about sex per se, and a great deal of discussion regarding social gender issues in a femminist ideological framework. The route of all sexual difficulties, implies Keith, is the dysfunctional attitudes and degrading behavior which men universally impose upon women. This supposed guide to sex and romance condecendingly preaches such sophmoric advice as not oggling other women in public and refraining from racially prejudiced humor. The recurring theme here is modern ideological/political correctness and please men learn to be more sensitive yada yada, as if the readers are men of paeleolithic barbarism sith the emotional maturity of a basket of puppies. Some sexual technique towards the final chapters focuses entirely on either licking or fingering the clitoris (duh!). One last note: watch out for the male "sexual sophistication" test; the questions are manipulated so as to classify men who are less than Keith's ideal into dysfunctional descriptions; the questions' and results' prejudice should make diciplined behavioral scientists weep for the damage "pop-psych" writing like that of Staci Keith can do to people's perceptions of sex and gender issues.
05 Aug 2007, 10:04 pm
sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
05 Aug 2007, 10:26 pm
05 Aug 2007, 11:38 pm
05 Aug 2007, 11:42 pm
05 Aug 2007, 11:45 pm
sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
05 Aug 2007, 11:45 pm
05 Aug 2007, 11:46 pm
Just calling 'em as I see 'em. 
sinsboldly wrote:
identifying passive agressors is a survival technique for women.
Don't need much technique to identify this numbnuts.
I've seen at least five thousand jerks like him.
My favorite thing about them is when they stomp away.
05 Aug 2007, 11:49 pm
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Don't pick your nose |
06 Jan 2025, 9:41 pm |
| FIFA Club World Cub Pick 'Em 2025 |
01 Feb 2025, 4:57 pm |
