funeralxempire wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
What's wrong with viewing your fellow humans as an experience to be checked off or an accessory to finally be seen with?
I make sure that all my lovers don’t clash with my favorite purse. I hate that!
Where's mine?! Everyone else gets one and it's not fair to expect me to learn the level of social function required to participate. Someone should be forced to lower their standards until I count, although they need to meet my standards.Yes! This!
The sense of entitlement in some of the posts in this thread is concerning.
Sadly it's not just this thread, it's pretty much every time the topic comes up.
It seems like when women end up in this boat they're prone to just internalizing being undesired;
men seem to grow resentful over it - possibly because of how much being sexually active is associated with concepts of masculinity.You are known for your sexual exploits.
So I hear.
Just sayin'.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ff2/57ff265f4e08602e0af8a325e43a50c473daa53b" alt="Wink ;)"
Muse933277 wrote:
I know the people with this sense of entitlement are often offended by having it described as such, but it's fundamental to understanding a big part of the struggle.
But you can see how it looks, right?
You, having experienced more than 20 sexual partners based on what you have said publically, aren't really in a position to judge, I would have thought.
It would be like a millionaire telling poor ppl to "suck it up".
Muse933277 wrote:
You're likely to partner with people you click with, not the people you find most attractive. If you never click with anyone or ignore the people you click with because they're not what you envision, you're bound to struggle a lot more.
I agree with you here.
I have seen too many ppl who want a relationship being ultra selective and only interested in ppl above their physical league.
I am NOT saying the OP has the same attitude.