Feminists Have More Fun (LiveScience)
GoatOnFire wrote:
If I were an atheist I would come to the conclusion that life has no purpose and should be destroyed, of course, I came to the latter part of that conclusion anyway.
The whole world would be a worthless hunk of rock, and people would be nothing but fermented compost that exist solely to keep reproducing pointlessly when it would be less painful to just die out. It would be difficult to maintain egoism after death, if it is about being remembered people will eventually forget you, even if you do something crazy like kill a celebrity.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
You are making a generalization, and you are saying what all atheists should be like, because they don't have a source for morals as believers do? and those who do are hypocrites? it seems it is like that what you are refering, a kind of hypocricy, which it doesn't make sense.
Morals and ethics have a lot to do as human beings interacting and organizing with each other, set of rules are valuable to mantain a certain order in which everyone is happy or satisfied about it, you don't need religion or believe in a diety these days to actually understand that.
About the purpose of life, there is always a purpouse, on how you want to live your life with your family and other human beings around you, you give a real meaning to your life when you live at peace with yourself and with other people you care about.
Altruistic, you can be that and be an atheist as well, and not expect any afterlife reward, which by what you are saying, being good with people, helping, etc. would be hipocrycy if you do all of that to earn a ticket to paradise.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
Last edited by greenblue on 19 Oct 2007, 10:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
GoatOnFire wrote:
So far on this thread I have said "f**k Africa" and I made a sexist comment. But the only indignant responses I have gotten so far are about the comments I make about atheism. Interesting...
Didn't notice the sexist comment, and if you don't like Africa, well...great... it isn't hurting anyone any more than someone saying "f**k America" or "f**k (insert country).
As for atheism, that wasn't the issue I had. The issue I had (and still have) is that you call it hypocritical to not be self-serving if you believe that there's nothing after death. Believing that is not the same as believing that life is "pointless." Not all atheists have come to that conclusion, and it is far from a fact.
GoatOnFire wrote:
If I were an atheist I would come to the conclusion that life has no purpose and should be destroyed.
That probably would be your case, not all people are the same, not all atheists/agnostics are the same, as well not all believers are the same.
Atheists not having purpose and morals because of the lack of belief of a punishment after death, is a misconception anyway.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
Last edited by greenblue on 19 Oct 2007, 11:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GoatOnFire
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=9552.jpg)
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
calandale wrote:
Well, I DID, but not for any reason other than
that 'tis more aesthetically pleasing to achieve
nothing of value with nothing, than with complexity.
Without morals, I can't see coming to this decision
(or any other).
Convenient that you haven't elaborated on your moral system. I'm sure that would take a long time for all of us and we couldn't fully do it justice anyway. That's why the debate on this never ends.
calandale wrote:
These morals
mostly precede religion. Now, one could
argue that they come directly from God,
or from what is RIGHT, but they help ensure
survival, and thus are necessary. What is
necessary need not be GOOD.
mostly precede religion. Now, one could
argue that they come directly from God,
or from what is RIGHT, but they help ensure
survival, and thus are necessary. What is
necessary need not be GOOD.
Not all of them help ensure survival, some of them are quite unneccessary.
Quote:
If you are an atheist and your life sucks and isn't going to improve what reason would there be not to just go out and kill as many people as you can before you get killed? Aside from just being too much of a p**** to do it.
calandale wrote:
Maybe you wouldn't enjoy it? Maybe you believe in
some purpose, and don't wish to damage it. Maybe
you feel that you have some duty. It's not all about
the self, necessarily. God or not.
some purpose, and don't wish to damage it. Maybe
you feel that you have some duty. It's not all about
the self, necessarily. God or not.
I don't buy that. If I was atheist I wouldn't believe in some purpose and already would have done this. The reasons I haven't:
1. I'm not an atheist. 2. I'm waiting to see if I can figure out a way to destroy all of humanity.
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?
GoatOnFire wrote:
There are other motivations, of course, but one who did enough dwelling to come to the conclusion that there are no afterlife consequences for their actions would see that there is no reason for any other way.
No reason for any other way? Any other way of what?
geek wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
There are other motivations, of course, but one who did enough dwelling to come to the conclusion that there are no afterlife consequences for their actions would see that there is no reason for any other way.
No reason for any other way? Any other way of what?
Viewing the world, I guess.
Time for a cage match. GoatOnFire VS Ragtime.
GoatOnFire
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=9552.jpg)
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
greenblue wrote:
You are making a generalization, and you are saying what all atheists should be like
Yes, I am. I have every right to do so if I please.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
shadexiii wrote:
As for atheism, that wasn't the issue I had. The issue I had (and still have) is that you call it hypocritical to not be self-serving if you believe that there's nothing after death. Believing that is not the same as believing that life is "pointless." Not all atheists have come to that conclusion, and it is far from a fact.
I've already said that everyone is a hypocrite. I know not all atheists have come to that conclusion, I'm just saying that they should. I couldn't care less if people don't like it. What are they going to do? Sue me?
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
greenblue wrote:
it seems it is like that what you are refering, a kind of hypocricy, which it doesn't make sense.
Nothing makes sense if you dig deep enough.
greenblue wrote:
Morals and ethics have a lot to do as human beings interacting and organizing with each other, set of rules are valuable to mantain a certain order in which everyone is happy or satisfied about it, you don't need religion or believe in a diety these days to actually understand that.
Some of the morals and ethics have no appreciable benefits purely from humanity's point of view, not that I care because I believe humanity should be destroyed anyway. There has never been a time where everyone is happy or satisfied about anything.
greenblue wrote:
About the purpose of life, there is always a purpouse, on how you want to live your life with your family and other human beings around you, you give a real meaning to your life when you live at peace with yourself and with other people you care about.
Altruistic, you can be that and be an atheist as well, and not expect any afterlife reward, which by what you are saying, being good with people, helping, etc. would be hipocrycy if you do all of that to earn a ticket to paradise.
Altruistic, you can be that and be an atheist as well, and not expect any afterlife reward, which by what you are saying, being good with people, helping, etc. would be hipocrycy if you do all of that to earn a ticket to paradise.
That is so cliche I don't even want to comment.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?
GoatOnFire
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=9552.jpg)
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
shadexiii wrote:
geek wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
There are other motivations, of course, but one who did enough dwelling to come to the conclusion that there are no afterlife consequences for their actions would see that there is no reason for any other way.
No reason for any other way? Any other way of what?
Viewing the world, I guess.
Time for a cage match. GoatOnFire VS Ragtime.
I wonder why he hasn't thrown his hat into this ring yet? He said he wanted a serious discussion...
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?
GoatOnFire wrote:
I've already said that everyone is a hypocrite. I know not all atheists have come to that conclusion, I'm just saying that they should. I couldn't care less if people don't like it. What are they going to do? Sue me?
No, they will simply write you off. It is a belief you hold, that there's no point. That's the whole reason I suggested the cage match. It could be entertaining to watch both of you tell the other how incorrect and inferior each others' beliefs are.
Besides, people only come to a logical conclusion when something makes sense. They come to a conclusion by reasoning it out, by "digging deep enough."
GoatOnFire wrote:
Nothing makes sense if you dig deep enough.
Aw crap, you just divided by zero.
GoatOnFire
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=9552.jpg)
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
GoatOnFire wrote:
There are other motivations, of course, but one who did enough dwelling to come to the conclusion that there are no afterlife consequences for their actions would see that there is no reason for any other way.
geek wrote:
No reason for any other way? Any other way of what?
Read it in context... -.-
geek wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
The people I am talking about have spent time dwelling on what may exist after death and came to a conclusion. With the conclusion that they made there are implications that do make them either hypocritical or very stupid if they do anything good that detriments them in anyway.
That would be true if greed and fear were the only possible motivations. But they aren't.
GoatOnFire wrote:
Maintaining pleasure for one. I was talking about a specific situation. There are other motivations, of course, but one who did enough dwelling to come to the conclusion that there are no afterlife consequences for their actions would see that there is no reason for any other way. But, as I have already said, humans are very stupid.
Any other way that you can possibly be motivated to do something.
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?
GoatOnFire wrote:
That is so cliche I don't even want to comment.
That could be a purpose, but whether it is a truly meaningful purpose is debatable. Why hold on to a bad life for longer if it will inevitably come to a definite end anyway? Why not just end it now if there's nothing there?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
What I mentioned could be one of many porpouses, there are others that can be taken as such like art, music, science, exploring things and finding answers to some questions or problems, which have been answered, and stuff like that, that I would take as some purposes that people have in their lives, and how they choose to live with them, besides the humanistic purpouses some have, either way, your assumption is depressing actually, to think that every atheist must feel like they should kill themselves because of the lack of gods and an utopian heaven waiting for them, therefore a lack of any purpouse in life. That sounds funny actually.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
GoatOnFire
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=9552.jpg)
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
shadexiii wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
I've already said that everyone is a hypocrite. I know not all atheists have come to that conclusion, I'm just saying that they should. I couldn't care less if people don't like it. What are they going to do? Sue me?
No, they will simply write you off. It is a belief you hold, that there's no point. That's the whole reason I suggested the cage match. It could be entertaining to watch both of you tell the other how incorrect and inferior each others' beliefs are.
Write me off, huh? I did this primarily to get a response. It worked. Why did they respond if they just could have written me off?
shadexiii wrote:
Besides, people only come to a logical conclusion when something makes sense. They come to a conclusion by reasoning it out, by "digging deep enough."
GoatOnFire wrote:
Nothing makes sense if you dig deep enough.
Aw crap, you just divided by zero.[/quote]
People come to a seemingly logical solution when something seems to make sense. I'm suggesting that they aren't digging deep enough. If there was a logical solution there wouldn't be so many different interpretations out there. I'm suggesting that human thought is not well developed enough to come up with a satisfactory answer to some of the questions that have been asked. I'm suggesting a lot of things.
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?
GoatOnFire wrote:
Any other way that you can possibly be motivated to do something.
So anyone who does something for a reason other than pleasure isn't very smart in your eyes?
Man, you and Ragtime must be pretty lonely at the top. I'm guessing they're very separate mountains, one of you would have thrown the other off by now.
You also could have saved a lot of space there by not repeatedly quoting yourself. What was your motivation? Pleasure?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
shadexiii wrote:
geek wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
There are other motivations, of course, but one who did enough dwelling to come to the conclusion that there are no afterlife consequences for their actions would see that there is no reason for any other way.
No reason for any other way? Any other way of what?
Viewing the world, I guess.
Time for a cage match. GoatOnFire VS Ragtime.
That was how it sounded, but that doesn't make a lot of sense, so I had to ask.
My own perspective is that it would be an act of unfathomable intellectual arrogance to suppose that a human was capable of conceiving of what a deity, if such a thing exists, would think, feel or want, if it even HAD thoughts, feelings, or wants as we understand them, which seems like a gargantuan assumption. And yet we're to accept that (A) a deity exists, (B) GoatOnFire has some list of the deity's likes and dislikes, obtained by unknown means, which he fully comprehends, (C) "life after death," "system of divine punishments and rewards" and "a purpose for anything in the universe" are among the things disliked by the deity, (D) that we must care about and obey what's on the deity's lists, even though there is no reason for us to do so... it just goes on & on. Logical contradictions held together by rubber bands and leaps of faith.
Shoot, here he is hating the human race, while at the same time suggesting that they are capable of understanding the infinite. I'd have boundless respect for the human race if I believed that.
GoatOnFire
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=9552.jpg)
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts
greenblue wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
That is so cliche I don't even want to comment.
That could be a purpose, but whether it is a truly meaningful purpose is debatable. Why hold on to a bad life for longer if it will inevitably come to a definite end anyway? Why not just end it now if there's nothing there?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
What I mentioned could be one of many porpouses, there are others that can be taken as such like art, music, science, exploring things and finding answers to some questions or problems, which have been answered, and stuff like that, that I would take as some purposes that people have in their lives, and how they choose to live with them, besides the humanistic purpouses some have, either way, your assumption is depressing actually, to think that every atheist must feel like they should kill themselves because of the lack of gods and an utopian heaven waiting for them, therefore a lack of any purpouse in life. That sounds funny actually.
Putting words in my mouth alert:
I didn't say that every atheist must feel like they should kill themselves. I said that if an atheist has a bad life he/she should go on a killing spree if he/she has the brass.
I never definitively specified about god or a utopian heaven, I just said that if there is nothing at the end then the temporary nature of life makes life trivial in the long run.
This debate will never end unless I quit it, and I'm getting bored. I've thrown in my take, now go ahead and tell me how incorrect and inferior my beliefs are. I haven't completely unloaded them because it would take too long. I doubt any of you will have anything to say to change my mind, you don't know what makes me tick so you are shooting blind when trying to make a point. Just like I was shooting blind at all of you just for the hell of it. Try it, it's fun for a little while.
_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?
GoatOnFire wrote:
I never definitively specified about god or a utopian heaven, I just said that if there is nothing at the end then the temporary nature of life makes life trivial in the long run.
Only if you are solely concerned with your own life, and care nothing about the rest of the world. Life keeps going on even after your own life ends, unless you can't stand the thought of that and try to end all life.
And yes, I ignored your little speech. Not my problem if you lack the endurance to stick around, and I'm also not concerned about keeping you entertained.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)