The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
And the repeated claim of WP girls that "each girl has a type" , "each girl has a different opinion in what is attractive" has been proven wrong, girls, as a large, are pretty much clones in that regard.
Yeah, kinda have to agree with this sentiment. If you look at porn, which is made almost entirely with only men in mind, you see there’s porn featuring every type of woman you can imagine: fat women, thin women, short women, tall women, hairy, shaved, redheads, blondes, brunettes…
This is because, I think, men actually have varied sexual tastes and preferences, not so with women. If you look at romance novels, which are basically the female-version of porn, all the male characters there are pretty much the same and completely interchangeable. They’re all tall, dark and handsome.
It’s sad really. There’s a man out there for every woman, but not a woman out there for every man…
For once, I agree with you, there are evidences that men are less hive minded and more diversified when it comes to what is attractive.
Look also at feminist porn and porn made for women by women; there are no several types of men like how the porn for men has many types of women