10 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
10 Aug 2011, 9:02 pm
Quote:
Techstep and Technomonk 79.79
i always liked techstep, great username for one! Too male though
10 Aug 2011, 9:21 pm
TechnoMonk wrote:
Quote:
Techstep and Technomonk 79.79
i always liked techstep, great username for one! Too male though
Yeah, the penis is always a dealbreaker for me too, it's a shame...
10 Aug 2011, 9:25 pm
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,523
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
10 Aug 2011, 9:30 pm
Moog wrote:
Weeeeeeee
I wonder if we can break WP with a list long enough.
I wonder if we can break WP with a list long enough.
Yeah, I think you're building a factorial pyramid here. I guess if it gets too unwieldy you can always make each new person the center of the universe for a post - it'll make em feel warm and fuzzy anyway
.
We might have to take a beer donation as well for ya with all this number plugging.
10 Aug 2011, 9:55 pm
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Moog wrote:
Weeeeeeee
I wonder if we can break WP with a list long enough.
I wonder if we can break WP with a list long enough.
Yeah, I think you're building a factorial pyramid here. I guess if it gets too unwieldy you can always make each new person the center of the universe for a post - it'll make em feel warm and fuzzy anyway
.Hmm, why didn't I think of that? I think the big list appeals to me in some daft way. It's quite Piscean to be all mashed together, everything dissolved into one.
Quote:
We might have to take a beer donation as well for ya with all this number plugging.
That's kind but I'm just in it for the pure experimental and educational thrill
10 Aug 2011, 10:27 pm
Graelwyn wrote:
Moog wrote:
Graelwyn wrote:
Heh, looked into all of this myself in the past and had a few books on synastry.
Astrology has been one of my main interests on and off for a long time now.
Main issue I have had is time not being put on birth certificates here in the Uk, and only knowing I was born between 2 and 3am, meaning I could be a cap or an aqua ascendant. So, I always put a time in the middle, best I can do.
Astrology has been one of my main interests on and off for a long time now.
Main issue I have had is time not being put on birth certificates here in the Uk, and only knowing I was born between 2 and 3am, meaning I could be a cap or an aqua ascendant. So, I always put a time in the middle, best I can do.
That can muddy things. Do you feel more of a Cap or more of an Aqua ascendant?
Chart rectification is supposed to be dead hard, but that's never stopped me having a go
The way you present here on WP suggests Aquarius to me, but that's only with a very superficial assessment.
I think that looking at transits of planets (particularly outer planets) to houses can help make sense of which is more likely. I'll send you some junk later.
From what I have read of Cap, and I have read extensively as I was determined to know which I was, it does not fit me, as I am not at all into the things that Caps are supposedly into. The only Cap thing I have is that I am prone to being rather serious, lol.
Serious is quite an interesting word. I think Aqua can be serious. I suppose it depends on what you're serious about... A Leo might be serious about their ego, for example; never let a Leo feel like you don't take their importance seriously
Quote:
I did conclude Aquarius myself in the end, especially given I have always been into humanitarian things and do tend to be somewhat quirky in my ways.
If I was born even a tad later, I'd be a Pisces ascendant, but that would be far too difficult to contemplate since I have a Pisces moon, lol.
If I was born even a tad later, I'd be a Pisces ascendant, but that would be far too difficult to contemplate since I have a Pisces moon, lol.
With the chart I have for you here, and using the equal house system, your midheaven falls in the 11th, which suggests a humanitarian vocation and rejection of traditional career paths... which might feel a bit 'anti Capricorn'.
Neptune is up there too, in quite a close conjunction to the midheaven, so you may have quite some idealism about society and community in a broad, perhaps global sense. Humanity in general, rather than specific groups or individuals. Which probably feels quite Aquarian.
My feeling is that you could still have a Capricorn ascendant! But it would probably be in the final degrees of the sign, if at all.
Which probably only serves to make things less clear?
10 Aug 2011, 10:30 pm
Moog wrote:
Graelwyn wrote:
Moog wrote:
Graelwyn wrote:
Heh, looked into all of this myself in the past and had a few books on synastry.
Astrology has been one of my main interests on and off for a long time now.
Main issue I have had is time not being put on birth certificates here in the Uk, and only knowing I was born between 2 and 3am, meaning I could be a cap or an aqua ascendant. So, I always put a time in the middle, best I can do.
Astrology has been one of my main interests on and off for a long time now.
Main issue I have had is time not being put on birth certificates here in the Uk, and only knowing I was born between 2 and 3am, meaning I could be a cap or an aqua ascendant. So, I always put a time in the middle, best I can do.
That can muddy things. Do you feel more of a Cap or more of an Aqua ascendant?
Chart rectification is supposed to be dead hard, but that's never stopped me having a go
The way you present here on WP suggests Aquarius to me, but that's only with a very superficial assessment.
I think that looking at transits of planets (particularly outer planets) to houses can help make sense of which is more likely. I'll send you some junk later.
From what I have read of Cap, and I have read extensively as I was determined to know which I was, it does not fit me, as I am not at all into the things that Caps are supposedly into. The only Cap thing I have is that I am prone to being rather serious, lol.
Serious is quite an interesting word. I think Aqua can be serious. I suppose it depends on what you're serious about... A Leo might be serious about their ego, for example; never let a Leo feel like you don't take their importance seriously
Quote:
I did conclude Aquarius myself in the end, especially given I have always been into humanitarian things and do tend to be somewhat quirky in my ways.
If I was born even a tad later, I'd be a Pisces ascendant, but that would be far too difficult to contemplate since I have a Pisces moon, lol.
If I was born even a tad later, I'd be a Pisces ascendant, but that would be far too difficult to contemplate since I have a Pisces moon, lol.
With the chart I have for you here, and using the equal house system, your midheaven falls in the 11th, which suggests a humanitarian vocation and rejection of traditional career paths... which might feel a bit 'anti Capricorn'.
Neptune is up there too, in quite a close conjunction to the midheaven, so you may have quite some idealism about society and community in a broad, perhaps global sense. Humanity in general, rather than specific groups or individuals. Which probably feels quite Aquarian.
My feeling is that you could still have a Capricorn ascendant! But it would probably be in the final degrees of the sign, if at all.
Which probably only serves to make things less clear?
Ho Hum
I so wish my mother had looked at her watch or a clock when I was popping out 
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,095
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
11 Aug 2011, 2:33 am
11 Aug 2011, 3:17 am
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,523
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
11 Aug 2011, 6:40 am
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Face_of_Boo and Graelwyn 79.30
Me and Graelwyn should get married.
Me and Graelwyn should get married.
Quote:
Techstep and Graelwyn -72.16
We could probably meet up for tea just for the fun of seeing the rest of the restaurant ducking under tables.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DFgZgA-xqY&playnext=1&list=PL57366815309A42D1[/youtube]
11 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Moog wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Moog wrote:
Weeeeeeee
I wonder if we can break WP with a list long enough.
I wonder if we can break WP with a list long enough.
Yeah, I think you're building a factorial pyramid here. I guess if it gets too unwieldy you can always make each new person the center of the universe for a post - it'll make em feel warm and fuzzy anyway
.Hmm, why didn't I think of that? I think the big list appeals to me in some daft way. It's quite Piscean to be all mashed together, everything dissolved into one.
Funny thing is, I was thinking it was hard to read, but I still liked it better that way and didn't really know why.
11 Aug 2011, 5:24 pm
11 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
11 Aug 2011, 5:59 pm
11 Aug 2011, 9:13 pm
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Face_of_Boo and Graelwyn 79.30
Me and Graelwyn should get married.
Me and Graelwyn should get married.
Quote:
Techstep and Graelwyn -72.16
We could probably meet up for tea just for the fun of seeing the rest of the restaurant ducking under tables.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DFgZgA-xqY&playnext=1&list=PL57366815309A42D1[/youtube]
Yes, to avoid the flying teacups I could possibly end up aiming for your head, according to that harmony rating
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Compromising to dating |
Today, 6:32 pm |
| Dating Someone on the Spectrum |
02 Jan 2025, 4:33 am |
| A part of me wants to give up with dating |
17 Nov 2024, 2:26 pm |
| Was/is it taboo to talk about your dating life with others? |
08 Dec 2024, 6:50 pm |
