What really irritates me about what I'm reading on here...

Page 5 of 5 [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

26 Nov 2012, 3:48 am

mds_02 wrote:
I don't think, for most, it's the actual physical act. More what it symbolizes. That somebody finds them desireable. They see the lack of it as proof of their own worthlessness.

hyperlexian wrote:
for women, the ease of getting sex is not relevant. why would anyone want sex with someone they find undesirable? :scratch:


So that they themselves can feel desireable. Which, for some, is far more important than actually enjoying the experience. That need to feel desired can lead to some pretty messed up self-destructive behavior. I know that firsthand.

It comes from incredibly low self-esteem. Feeling that the only worth you have is what other people give you. And, for many, the ability to find sexual partners is taken as a token of that worth.

Thing is, most who are in that position don't realize that it's the lack of self-esteem causing the focus on sex, not the other way around.

if the act is symbolic of themselves and they are seeing it only in terms of their own reflection... where does a partner even come into that? if someone's self-esteem is that low, i question whether a relationship could even begin to help them. it's all about him him HIM and HIS worthlessness. that's a very self-centred place to be seeking a partner from. maybe a therapist's couch would offer more assistance than a relationship would (or sex).


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Sagroth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 590
Location: Kansas

26 Nov 2012, 3:54 am

And finally, heterosexual procreation is the single most valued component of a relationship in most Western Cultures, and that's not an exaggeration.

Don't believe me?

Anti gay marriage legislation.

Anti-gay adoption laws.

Abortion issues.

"Marriage is between a man and a women."

How marriages without children are looked down upon.

Abstinence only until marriage education.

Outlawed polygamy(and the only kind still practiced at all in the US is polygyny).



Culturally speaking, having a child in wedlock is "winning" in a relationship. Sex is intrinsic to such(unless you artificially inseminate but even then infertile men and women are frowned upon).

It's an elephant in the room and it shapes every aspect of how love and dating are viewed in a society.

The only way to change that is to not conform.


_________________
KWATZ!


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

26 Nov 2012, 4:20 am

Sagroth wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Sagroth wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
I don't think, for most, it's the actual physical act. More what it symbolizes. That somebody finds them desireable. They see the lack of it as proof of their own worthlessness.

hyperlexian wrote:
for women, the ease of getting sex is not relevant. why would anyone want sex with someone they find undesirable? :scratch:


So that they themselves can feel desireable. Which, for some, is far more important than actually enjoying the experience. That need to feel desired can lead to some pretty messed up self-destructive behavior. I know that firsthand.

It comes from incredibly low self-esteem. Feeling that the only worth you have is what other people give you. And, for many, the ability to find sexual partners is taken as a token of that worth.

Thing is, most who are in that position don't realize that it's the lack of self-esteem causing the focus on sex, not the other way around.

if the act is symbolic of themselves and they are seeing it only in terms of their own reflection... where does a partner even come into that? if someone's self-esteem is that low, i question whether a relationship could even begin to help them. it's all about him him HIM and HIS worthlessness. that's a very self-centred place to be seeking a partner from. maybe a therapist's couch would offer more assistance than a relationship would (or sex).


Well sure, in the end there's always personal accountability. But it wouldn't be such a pervasive neurosis if it wasn't culturally mandated.

cultures are changeable. perhaps this dialogue should be about how we can effect that?



Oh, certainly.

-Female equality
-Acceptance of alternative sexualities(unless they are demonstrably harmful, such as pedophilia)
-Acceptance of alternative family structure(polyamorous families, gay adoption, etc)
-More free sexuality
-Acceptance of gender roles outside "masculine male" and "feminine female."
-Rejection of hegemonic gender
-Free birth control
-Women having more control over what happens to their body.
-Rejection of procreation as the ultimate human goal(we have reached a point where overpopulation is a greater danger than under)
-seperating sex as an enjoyable activity from sex as procreation(sorry Catholics)


And that's just off the top of my head.

agreed, on all counts! :D


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

26 Nov 2012, 4:42 am

we have the state and its many private corporations to do that for us :wink:



Adam82
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 615

26 Nov 2012, 5:21 am

DialAForAwesome wrote:
Withdrawal wrote:
But if you just can't do relationships like NTs, then it's still unlikely you'll be sucessful because you might not find anyone compatible. Most NT people (and probably some people with AS/autism too) go about their lives and, as long as their lifestyle involves enough social interaction, relationships just happen.


This times 10,000.


Key words being 'most NT people'. We are not NTs. Social interaction is most difficult, and not particularly fun for me, besides the ultimate objective of getting a girlfriend.

To the OP, continue to be irritated. We're gonna continue posting about our dire situations, until we get girlfriends.



Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

26 Nov 2012, 5:24 am

maybe the continual posting is preventing you from pair bonding?



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

26 Nov 2012, 7:09 am

off-topic discussion was split to a new thread here:

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt216431.html


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

26 Nov 2012, 8:19 am

CrinklyCrustacean wrote:
This isn't a case of the girl rejecting someone who's never had a girlfriend, it's a case of Fnord actively encouraging a girl to do so, and trying to justify a blatantly flawed argument. Everybody has to start somewhere. He should know this.

I figured. And that's why guys like me, who have don't good looks, social skills, or mountains of money, have to resort to dating girls they feel zero attraction for, just to "officially" have had a relationship at some point. This way, other girls won't be able to reject him solely over the lack of experience, because he "technically" already had a girlfriend before.

Consider the "must have previous experience" statement in almost every job ad out there. So what do you do for your first job? Try to find the best job out there, even though you know that the employer wants only someone who's had another job before? Or try applying with lesser-known companies that have fewer applicants? Or just apply somewhere where the HR person will overlook it or won't care? Whatever course of action, the goal becomes any first job, period, rather the best job or even an OK job.

Similarly, when the same requirement is imposed by girls, love becomes irrelevant, due to the artificial roadblocks put in. As a result, an aspie guy's first girlfriend oftentimes ends up being whoever first showed interest, like in my case, just to get that elusive "experience". Yeah, I had some good conversations with her, and being able to touch her and kiss her pretty much anytime was extremely flattering. But I also ended up checking the local map when planning dates, to avoid areas where my friends hang out. All that until we broke up. I'm not proud of that, but I did what I had to do: date someone I didn't desire just to avoid being rejected over lack of experience.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

26 Nov 2012, 6:15 pm

Ill go off topic and post what irritates me about what im reading here.

Its the ohh so common gender bashing I keep seeing. Coming from the same dipshits, and yes of both genders. Just because you had 3 bad experiences doesnt mean every f*****g person in your f*****g life and those who youve only seen online are all out to get you. Being an as*hole isnt protectiong yourself, why? Because someone that is trully after you wont give a s**t, theyll take it anyway. So stop being a hatefull whinny b***h and try to enjoy life and to find good people.

And before you ask, yes this is to both the men and women here. Im tired of both of them and all their BS. We both have the same problems wether you admit to it or not



JanuaryMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,359

26 Nov 2012, 6:37 pm

Boxman108 wrote:
So you're saying that sex should be seen as a prize and women should be seen as a hobby? I don't think that's much better to post here than anything they've written.


I always thought the hurdle most guys here can't seem to overcome is that sex and women should not be objectified, or a special interest of theirs. Not naming names but there's a couple of guys here that seem to have women as their special interest. Look how well that's working out for them. These 2 philosophies taint and distort a man's perception of love and dating beyond all repair and will only make a man avoided in public not just by women but everybody.



DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

26 Nov 2012, 6:43 pm

The irony here is, JanuaryMan, that a few male aspies here don't really care about sex so much as just wanting a relationship. So either way, no matter what philosophy some of us have, it can't change and won't change unless there is either an overhaul of society (good luck with that) or we just randomly meet someone as a chance encounter. Or we change ourselves to be not like what we are. I was at a point where I was willing to do number 3 because it worked for a short while before. But now with my stubbornness I can't bring myself to do that.


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


JanuaryMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,359

26 Nov 2012, 7:04 pm

DialAForAwesome wrote:
The irony here is, JanuaryMan, that a few male aspies here don't really care about sex so much as just wanting a relationship. So either way, no matter what philosophy some of us have, it can't change and won't change unless there is either an overhaul of society (good luck with that) or we just randomly meet someone as a chance encounter. Or we change ourselves to be not like what we are. I was at a point where I was willing to do number 3 because it worked for a short while before. But now with my stubbornness I can't bring myself to do that.


I don't think we have to change who we are, though. Just bring out the best traits in ourselves while suppressing the bad ones. Change is sometimes necessary or beneficial at the least but sometimes the person is already halfway there and needs some fine tuning or advice in order to make things work. And I figured that is what the Love and Dating section amongst other things was implemented for.



DerStadtschutz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,467

27 Nov 2012, 8:49 am

Aspie1 wrote:
CrinklyCrustacean wrote:
This isn't a case of the girl rejecting someone who's never had a girlfriend, it's a case of Fnord actively encouraging a girl to do so, and trying to justify a blatantly flawed argument. Everybody has to start somewhere. He should know this.

I figured. And that's why guys like me, who have don't good looks, social skills, or mountains of money, have to resort to dating girls they feel zero attraction for, just to "officially" have had a relationship at some point. This way, other girls won't be able to reject him solely over the lack of experience, because he "technically" already had a girlfriend before.

Consider the "must have previous experience" statement in almost every job ad out there. So what do you do for your first job? Try to find the best job out there, even though you know that the employer wants only someone who's had another job before? Or try applying with lesser-known companies that have fewer applicants? Or just apply somewhere where the HR person will overlook it or won't care? Whatever course of action, the goal becomes any first job, period, rather the best job or even an OK job.

Similarly, when the same requirement is imposed by girls, love becomes irrelevant, due to the artificial roadblocks put in. As a result, an aspie guy's first girlfriend oftentimes ends up being whoever first showed interest, like in my case, just to get that elusive "experience". Yeah, I had some good conversations with her, and being able to touch her and kiss her pretty much anytime was extremely flattering. But I also ended up checking the local map when planning dates, to avoid areas where my friends hang out. All that until we broke up. I'm not proud of that, but I did what I had to do: date someone I didn't desire just to avoid being rejected over lack of experience.


The problem here is that "zero attraction" usually means you've looked at a picture and maybe a bit of text describing a few things about the other person, but you haven't bothered to try and get to know that person and aren't willing to try before judging either. Have you people ever heard "don't judge a book by its cover?" Don't date someone you know you wouldn't like, but actually get to know people. That's the point of dating; to get to know someone. It seems to me a lot of people are looking for the "love at first sight" fairytale thing. You can't truly love someone by simply laying eyes on him/her. You can be turned on or notice certain physical features that make you want to get into his/her pants, but that's about it.



WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,198
Location: California, United States

06 Dec 2012, 5:37 pm

anneurysm wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
If you want to be in a relationship simply for the purpose of being in a relationship, you completely do not understand what it means to be in a relationship and therefore do not deserve to be in one. I don't think anyone wants to be in a relationship with someone who only wants a relationship for an ego boost.


YES. And there are plenty of NTs who think this way too. You really have to find the right person to make it work.


well i would rather be in a relationship just to be in a relationship than not be in one at all just to get the experience, to end the single streak!