Page 5 of 6 [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

22 May 2013, 12:27 am

ShamelessGit wrote:
Why would I be proud of the fact that nobody likes me? Or if I were single by choice, then why would I be proud of the fact that I don't like anybody else?

If you were single by choice you wouldn't be able to like anyone? I didn't know "like" was a synonym for "want to make babies with".



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

22 May 2013, 2:45 am

hurtloam wrote:
Sorry, I've taken this thread off course a bit and talking too kuch about myself. Again I want to emphasise that people shouldn't be made to feel like they are weird for being single. Single people just want to be accepted as we are. We are not saying we are better than anyone else, we just want people not to make a fuss about how weird it is that we can't attract someone.

Did I say I don't like passive men? I can't remember that. What I can say is I don't like machismo.

I don't think I even know any passive guys...
I am amused that you think I have a choice in the matter. No body fancies me as far as I can tell. My hands are tied.


Here's the link to your post that I was referring to:

http://cdn.wrongplanet.net/postp5101757.html

I am amused you already forgot.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

22 May 2013, 2:48 am

Tyri0n wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
There is a certain amount of truth to that. I feel like 2 guys I know are so happy with being single, or rather, so against having a relationship that might ruin their freedom to watch or play soccer or have a beer with their friends that they are abhorrent of single women even talking to them. (they are obviously extreme exceptions to the norm though or just very bitter...) So they are 2 men whom I will never ask on a date.


You're making assumptions that I don't think are true (unless they explicitly said what you're saying about them).

But I'll make my own assumptions about your situation now by stating that it's probably you make excuses for not dating guys that seem like they may be good dating/relationship material. You seem to be looking for that perfect guy who matches your ex-boyfriend or guy of your dreams who you know you could never attain.


Thank you, that means you assume that someone would want to spend time with me :)
In truth there is something about me that puts guys off. I'm not sure what it is. If I was on the outside looking in I would see it, but being me I don't know what it is. I used to be very opinionated and arrogant, I keep my mouth shut now, maybe I'm too quiet now. LOL :) To be honest I'd go out with either of them if they did actually ask me for a coffee. I have a gut feeling both would knock me back if I asked. One ignored my friend request on Facebook. (btw I don't object to men spending time with friends or playing soccer - just in case you think I'm a control freak!)

The unattainable man of my dreams is a man that wants to talk to me and that I just get on with and can talk to easily. Such creatures only seem to be married.


I remember I once suggested to you men that happen to be submissive. You said you wanted someone on equal grounds with you not someone who was submissive. Yet submissive men fit the characteristics of your dream man mentioned above.

Personally, I cannot understand why an independent woman like you, who doesn't need to rely on any man but just wants a partner to spend her time with romantically, would not accept a submissive man to have a relationship with. Men don't seem to mind dating submissive women. I don't see why the same cannot apply for women like you. Nor do I see how "dismissing" them is worth not having a relationship at all especially if they make sure to be pleasing to you emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually.


Why? Because, as Boo likes to say, humans are apes. Instinct, not common sense, drives compatibility for both men and women.


Not entirely correct. We, humans, have quite an advanced cortex that allows for reasoning to override instinct in many cases.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

22 May 2013, 2:50 am

PsychoSarah wrote:
^ no freaking duh. Only stuck up people who like to think they are better than everything else think otherwise.


Do you ever come up with anything insightful? :roll:



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,115
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 May 2013, 3:09 am

MCalavera wrote:
Tyri0n wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
There is a certain amount of truth to that. I feel like 2 guys I know are so happy with being single, or rather, so against having a relationship that might ruin their freedom to watch or play soccer or have a beer with their friends that they are abhorrent of single women even talking to them. (they are obviously extreme exceptions to the norm though or just very bitter...) So they are 2 men whom I will never ask on a date.


You're making assumptions that I don't think are true (unless they explicitly said what you're saying about them).

But I'll make my own assumptions about your situation now by stating that it's probably you make excuses for not dating guys that seem like they may be good dating/relationship material. You seem to be looking for that perfect guy who matches your ex-boyfriend or guy of your dreams who you know you could never attain.


Thank you, that means you assume that someone would want to spend time with me :)
In truth there is something about me that puts guys off. I'm not sure what it is. If I was on the outside looking in I would see it, but being me I don't know what it is. I used to be very opinionated and arrogant, I keep my mouth shut now, maybe I'm too quiet now. LOL :) To be honest I'd go out with either of them if they did actually ask me for a coffee. I have a gut feeling both would knock me back if I asked. One ignored my friend request on Facebook. (btw I don't object to men spending time with friends or playing soccer - just in case you think I'm a control freak!)

The unattainable man of my dreams is a man that wants to talk to me and that I just get on with and can talk to easily. Such creatures only seem to be married.


I remember I once suggested to you men that happen to be submissive. You said you wanted someone on equal grounds with you not someone who was submissive. Yet submissive men fit the characteristics of your dream man mentioned above.

Personally, I cannot understand why an independent woman like you, who doesn't need to rely on any man but just wants a partner to spend her time with romantically, would not accept a submissive man to have a relationship with. Men don't seem to mind dating submissive women. I don't see why the same cannot apply for women like you. Nor do I see how "dismissing" them is worth not having a relationship at all especially if they make sure to be pleasing to you emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually.


Why? Because, as Boo likes to say, humans are apes. Instinct, not common sense, drives compatibility for both men and women.


Not entirely correct. We, humans, have quite an advanced cortex that allows for reasoning to override instinct in many cases.


^ true, but not when it comes to dating and sex.

When it comes to dating and sex, most humans are often 100% their ape-selves; it is still one of the few things that where instinct totally takes over.



cakey
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

22 May 2013, 3:29 am

I think people should have pride in themselves no matter what their relationship status is.


_________________
Neurotypical. I'm very friendly; feel free to message me. :)


Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,659
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

22 May 2013, 6:08 am

If you don't want to remain single then why have "single pride"? That gives all your potential dates the impression that you don't want a relationship and want to remain single, thus discouraging them from dating you.



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

22 May 2013, 7:19 am

MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Sorry, I've taken this thread off course a bit and talking too kuch about myself. Again I want to emphasise that people shouldn't be made to feel like they are weird for being single. Single people just want to be accepted as we are. We are not saying we are better than anyone else, we just want people not to make a fuss about how weird it is that we can't attract someone.

Did I say I don't like passive men? I can't remember that. What I can say is I don't like machismo.

I don't think I even know any passive guys...
I am amused that you think I have a choice in the matter. No body fancies me as far as I can tell. My hands are tied.


Here's the link to your post that I was referring to:

http://cdn.wrongplanet.net/postp5101757.html

I am amused you already forgot.


Oh I still stand by that. It's funny, yesterday when you said "submissive" I immediately thought that you meant I should look for a quiet chap and ask him out and he would say yes because he would be so pleased that someone actually asked him. So I thought to myself, do I know anyone like that and couldn't think of anyone. A quiet guy could still be responsible, so it's not like I look at a man and think he's too quiet, I won't bother.

I'm not looking for a concubine by the way, I'm looking for a partner in life.

Anyway, this is all hypothetical, I have never met a guy and said "oh he's too submissive this won't work." In actuallity the real problem is that I'm not the world's greatest conversationalist (I'm not even mediocre, I'm just useless at it). I need to have a reason to talk to someone or I just go up to them exchange greetings and then get stuck, awkward silence, then excuse myself.

I am the flipside of alot of men here. I think: there are all these good looking, normal women in my sort of social group/area/place I live, why would the guy I'm talking to like awkward me. For example, someone has just got back in touch with me and I liked him a few years back, but he's a friendly soul and I can never work out whether any of the women I see him with or who are in his Facebook photos is his girlfriend because I think why would someone that nice be single? And if he knows all these women he can have anyone he wants, it's not like he's socially inept like me, why would he want me? Anyway, after this conversation we've been having I think I'm going to make more of an effort to find out, so then at least I can say I tried, rather than assuming he's taken.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,115
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 May 2013, 7:40 am

Quote:
In actuallity the real problem is that I'm not the world's greatest conversationalist (I'm not even mediocre, I'm just useless at it). I need to have a reason to talk to someone or I just go up to them exchange greetings and then get stuck, awkward silence, then excuse myself.


That's probably why I find dating extroverts easier most of the times: They do most of the talk :lol:, they do most of the plans and they always have something to talk about. And if I start talking with something, they continue it.



Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,659
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

22 May 2013, 7:51 am

hurtloam wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Sorry, I've taken this thread off course a bit and talking too kuch about myself. Again I want to emphasise that people shouldn't be made to feel like they are weird for being single. Single people just want to be accepted as we are. We are not saying we are better than anyone else, we just want people not to make a fuss about how weird it is that we can't attract someone.

Did I say I don't like passive men? I can't remember that. What I can say is I don't like machismo.

I don't think I even know any passive guys...
I am amused that you think I have a choice in the matter. No body fancies me as far as I can tell. My hands are tied.


Here's the link to your post that I was referring to:

http://cdn.wrongplanet.net/postp5101757.html

I am amused you already forgot.


Oh I still stand by that. It's funny, yesterday when you said "submissive" I immediately thought that you meant I should look for a quiet chap and ask him out and he would say yes because he would be so pleased that someone actually asked him. So I thought to myself, do I know anyone like that and couldn't think of anyone. A quiet guy could still be responsible, so it's not like I look at a man and think he's too quiet, I won't bother.

I'm not looking for a concubine by the way, I'm looking for a partner in life.

Anyway, this is all hypothetical, I have never met a guy and said "oh he's too submissive this won't work." In actuallity the real problem is that I'm not the world's greatest conversationalist (I'm not even mediocre, I'm just useless at it). I need to have a reason to talk to someone or I just go up to them exchange greetings and then get stuck, awkward silence, then excuse myself.

I am the flipside of alot of men here. I think: there are all these good looking, normal women in my sort of social group/area/place I live, why would the guy I'm talking to like awkward me. For example, someone has just got back in touch with me and I liked him a few years back, but he's a friendly soul and I can never work out whether any of the women I see him with or who are in his Facebook photos is his girlfriend because I think why would someone that nice be single? And if he knows all these women he can have anyone he wants, it's not like he's socially inept like me, why would he want me? Anyway, after this conversation we've been having I think I'm going to make more of an effort to find out, so then at least I can say I tried, rather than assuming he's taken.


Have you ever tried asking a man on a date? He doesn't have to be "passive", just someone that you like. You know, there's no law against women taking the initiative. If you don't know if someone has a girlfriend, you can simply ask him.



Last edited by Jono on 22 May 2013, 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

22 May 2013, 7:53 am

i do not have the emotional capacity to experience "pride" (or "shame" (it's opposite)).
i have thought a lot about what "pride" is however. it is very hard for me to fathom. people can be proud of themselves for whatever reason, and that to me means that they approve of their station in life. whether it be earned or accidental.

sometimes i see news stories about "hero's" that performed some menial act that saved the life of someone, and when i see them speak in the inevitable interviews, many of them start to sort of cry or something when they recount their actions. i do not understand their tears, or the reasons why they get choked up when they are simply recounting what they did.

it is like they are so desperate to be hoisted high on the shoulders of public approval, that when they actually are celebrated for their generic responses to situations they were accidentally in the vicinity of, they relate the sequence of events with a kind of hmmm....faked humility, and they play down their efforts while getting teary eyed and it seems to me that they try to act the part of the "oblivious hero" , but their cover is blown by the fact that they start often to cry in admiration of them selves, and mask it as crying for the plight of "the rescued old lady who suffered no harm" or whatever else.

"pride" is baggage i am glad i am not toting.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,115
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 May 2013, 8:02 am

Jono wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Sorry, I've taken this thread off course a bit and talking too kuch about myself. Again I want to emphasise that people shouldn't be made to feel like they are weird for being single. Single people just want to be accepted as we are. We are not saying we are better than anyone else, we just want people not to make a fuss about how weird it is that we can't attract someone.

Did I say I don't like passive men? I can't remember that. What I can say is I don't like machismo.

I don't think I even know any passive guys...
I am amused that you think I have a choice in the matter. No body fancies me as far as I can tell. My hands are tied.


Here's the link to your post that I was referring to:

http://cdn.wrongplanet.net/postp5101757.html

I am amused you already forgot.


Oh I still stand by that. It's funny, yesterday when you said "submissive" I immediately thought that you meant I should look for a quiet chap and ask him out and he would say yes because he would be so pleased that someone actually asked him. So I thought to myself, do I know anyone like that and couldn't think of anyone. A quiet guy could still be responsible, so it's not like I look at a man and think he's too quiet, I won't bother.

I'm not looking for a concubine by the way, I'm looking for a partner in life.

Anyway, this is all hypothetical, I have never met a guy and said "oh he's too submissive this won't work." In actuallity the real problem is that I'm not the world's greatest conversationalist (I'm not even mediocre, I'm just useless at it). I need to have a reason to talk to someone or I just go up to them exchange greetings and then get stuck, awkward silence, then excuse myself.

I am the flipside of alot of men here. I think: there are all these good looking, normal women in my sort of social group/area/place I live, why would the guy I'm talking to like awkward me. For example, someone has just got back in touch with me and I liked him a few years back, but he's a friendly soul and I can never work out whether any of the women I see him with or who are in his Facebook photos is his girlfriend because I think why would someone that nice be single? And if he knows all these women he can have anyone he wants, it's not like he's socially inept like me, why would he want me? Anyway, after this conversation we've been having I think I'm going to make more of an effort to find out, so then at least I can say I tried, rather than assuming he's taken.


Have you ever tried asking a man on a date? He doesn't have to be "passive", just someone that you like. You know, there's no law against women taking the initiative. If you don't know if someone has a girlfriend, you can simply ask him.


Are you sure of that? In the "Dating Laws in Women's minds" book there might be an obvious constitutional law that says: "Women must not ask out men".


And oh, I think there's a law in Saudi Arabia that prevents women to initiate anything.



PsychoSarah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,109
Location: The division between Sanity and Insanity

22 May 2013, 8:10 am

MCalavera wrote:
PsychoSarah wrote:
^ no freaking duh. Only stuck up people who like to think they are better than everything else think otherwise.


Do you ever come up with anything insightful? :roll:


I can. And that was insulting. If you want me to be insightful, then give me an issue with more depth than this, because I find it pretty cut and dry; why should humans consider themselves so much greater than other animals when it comes to instincts? Or even certain individuals thinking that they couldn't possibly be as biased as everyone else. That is self-serving bias, the human tendency to portray information in a way that makes us look good and others look bad (so, a person being told the statistics on shallowness will believe them, but will count themselves in the minority that isn't shallow, regardless as to whether or not it is actually true).



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

22 May 2013, 8:15 am

PsychoSarah wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
PsychoSarah wrote:
^ no freaking duh. Only stuck up people who like to think they are better than everything else think otherwise.


Do you ever come up with anything insightful? :roll:


I can. And that was insulting. If you want me to be insightful, then give me an issue with more depth than this, because I find it pretty cut and dry; why should humans consider themselves so much greater than other animals when it comes to instincts? Or even certain individuals thinking that they couldn't possibly be as biased as everyone else. That is self-serving bias, the human tendency to portray information in a way that makes us look good and others look bad (so, a person being told the statistics on shallowness will believe them, but will count themselves in the minority that isn't shallow, regardless as to whether or not it is actually true).


It is a very clear well-established fact that humans are able to use reasoning to override their animal instincts. :roll:



PsychoSarah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,109
Location: The division between Sanity and Insanity

22 May 2013, 8:18 am

^ Certain judgments are still influenced by instinctual tendencies. Racism partially stems from the fact that our brains (beginning around age 5) fire fear and anger signals in response to people who do not look like us (people of different races). This isn't consciously controlled, and while people can attempt to be unbiased based on race, etc., studies show that the influence is still there, no matter how much people try.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

22 May 2013, 8:25 am

PsychoSarah wrote:
^ Certain judgments are still influenced by instinctual tendencies. Racism partially stems from the fact that our brains (beginning around age 5) fire fear and anger signals in response to people who do not look like us (people of different races). This isn't consciously controlled, and while people can attempt to be unbiased based on race, etc., studies show that the influence is still there, no matter how much people try.


Now you're changing the topic. You were arguing just a while ago that we weren't different from animals much in terms of overriding our instincts via reasoning.