Feminists Have More Fun (LiveScience)

Post Reply New Topic

Anyone who is human isn't very smart in my eyes. That includes me.

I quoted myself to keep things in context, and primarily to annoy you all.

And geek, you just put more words in my mouth, blatantly, this time, otherwise I wouldn't have felt compelled to respond. I think you're getting my game, although you just made some gargantuan assumptions by not paying attention to semantics. I never claimed to know what said deity likes and I don't have a list. I never said an afterlife has to involve a deity even, they are not mutually exclusive. I never said any of you must do anything. I've just been suggesting what you should do, you're doing it to by suggesting that I shouldn't tell you what you should do. And I was talking from the hypothetical perspective of an atheist, who does not believe in any deitys or afterlife when I said there is no reason for us to do anything. And I just said that humans are not capable of understanding the infinite.

Or are you just attempting to get my goat? If not, that was a very poor post.



Maybe that's my purpose.

Last edited by GoatOnFire on 20 Oct 2007, 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

I thought you were bored with this thread and leaving.

Every time I post there is something new to respond to. Maybe this time there won't be.

Or maybe there will. Oh noes, better respond!

Sorry, I forgot that you were a theist arguing from the perspective of what you suppose would be that of an atheist.

I find atheism to be as illogical as theism, so I don't have any further comment, except to note that atheist philosophers like Diderot and Hume (and many others since) have come up with logically consistent systems of ethics which required neither a deity or an afterlife. If you want a refutation, hit the library.

The site is broken and I can't split off-topic discussions. Thank you all for helping to make WrongPlanet the site is today.