Page 41 of 74 [ 1170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 74  Next

ezbzbfcg2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,977
Location: New Jersey, USA

08 Sep 2021, 3:05 am

ironpony wrote:
Oh I wasn't talking about my gf, but a friend of mine. Sorry, how do I suck for empathy? I was just trying to come up with possible resolutions to the incel problem. Does that make me unempathetic?

Yes. Empathy means putting yourself in the shoes of others. Your experience isn't universal. What a woman says isn't necessarily true. A 'friend of yours' is even more removed. Observe the sort of men she actually does date. Realize that a woman's word isn't necessarily based in fact. Don't believe what a person says; rather, observe what a person does.

Saying, "This ONE woman I know in passing said X, therefore, can all incels assume all women think this way?..." is very much a perversion of empathy. You lack empathy big time!



PhosphorusDecree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,609
Location: Yorkshire, UK

08 Sep 2021, 7:27 am

Yeah, this is rapidly turning into an "examples section" for what the OP was saying. Even to the point of viciously turning on One Of Us who has bucked the trend, as predicted several pages previously. Seriously guys, look around you. There are married men and men with girlfriends everwhere. Are they all tough, wealthy, smooth-talking Adonises with pecs the size of footballs? Really? One of the most happily-married men I know is obese, bald, mentally ill, chronically unemployed and has a habit of making offensive jokes when he's nervous. His good points are not exactly classic "Alpha Male" ones- loyal, caring, funny, creative. His wife is dotty about him.


_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

08 Sep 2021, 8:14 am

^^&^ Definitely!

It is the "usual suspects", with their ignorant claims, their sweeping generalizations, their one-source rumors, and their cherry-picking of (alleged) facts that are providing examples of the arguments I stated in the first post, 41 pages ago.

The only thing incels seem to be good at is making excuses for not putting forth any effort at self-initiative and self-improvement.  One of their favorite excuses is to blame everyone else for their lack of popularity when the single most common factor in all of their complaints is themselves!

Okay now, cue the "Yeah, buts" and "What ifs" from those usual suspects, sit back, and have a good laugh.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

08 Sep 2021, 8:29 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
... women are individual people, and not some collective hive mind with all the same attitudes and preferences.
↑ This, quoted for truth and posterity. ↑

It is this female individuality that seems to frustrate incels to no end, because there is no one, single "magic" method for attaining intimate status that will work with all women, or even with one woman all of the time.

Looks, attitude, behavior, and evidence of personal responsibility are all significant factors in being attractive.  The more of these factors a person possesses, the more likely that person will find fulfillment in an intimate relationship.

8) Then again, most incels seem to be more interested in sex than in relationships.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,029
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

08 Sep 2021, 12:15 pm

ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
ironpony wrote:
Oh I wasn't talking about my gf, but a friend of mine. Sorry, how do I suck for empathy? I was just trying to come up with possible resolutions to the incel problem. Does that make me unempathetic?

Yes. Empathy means putting yourself in the shoes of others. Your experience isn't universal. What a woman says isn't necessarily true. A 'friend of yours' is even more removed. Observe the sort of men she actually does date. Realize that a woman's word isn't necessarily based in fact. Don't believe what a person says; rather, observe what a person does.

Saying, "This ONE woman I know in passing said X, therefore, can all incels assume all women think this way?..." is very much a perversion of empathy. You lack empathy big time!


And what are men the epitome of honesty? :roll:


_________________
We won't go back.


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

08 Sep 2021, 12:25 pm

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
One of the most happily-married men I know is obese, bald, mentally ill, chronically unemployed and has a habit of making offensive jokes when he's nervous. His good points are not exactly classic "Alpha Male" ones- loyal, caring, funny, creative. His wife is dotty about him.
How sexually active is their marriage? She may have settled down with him for a stable life, rather than getting together with him out of lustful sexual desire.

Food for thought.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

08 Sep 2021, 12:28 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
And what are men; the epitome of honesty? :roll:

<* COUGH *> Silicone Implants <* COUGH *>



PhosphorusDecree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,609
Location: Yorkshire, UK

08 Sep 2021, 1:45 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
PhosphorusDecree wrote:
One of the most happily-married men I know is obese, bald, mentally ill, chronically unemployed and has a habit of making offensive jokes when he's nervous. His good points are not exactly classic "Alpha Male" ones- loyal, caring, funny, creative. His wife is dotty about him.
How sexually active is their marriage? She may have settled down with him for a stable life, rather than getting together with him out of lustful sexual desire.

Food for thought.


Hardly "stable", as he ain't the main breadwinner. If anything, I suspect he's rather good in bed...


_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 31,437
Location: Right over your left shoulder

08 Sep 2021, 1:54 pm

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
Aspie1 wrote:
PhosphorusDecree wrote:
One of the most happily-married men I know is obese, bald, mentally ill, chronically unemployed and has a habit of making offensive jokes when he's nervous. His good points are not exactly classic "Alpha Male" ones- loyal, caring, funny, creative. His wife is dotty about him.
How sexually active is their marriage? She may have settled down with him for a stable life, rather than getting together with him out of lustful sexual desire.

Food for thought.


Hardly "stable", as he ain't the main breadwinner. If anything, I suspect he's rather good in bed...


It's not implausible. Knowing how to make your partner's legs twitch can make up for other deficits. :nerdy:


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Make America Great (Depression) Again


ezbzbfcg2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,977
Location: New Jersey, USA

08 Sep 2021, 3:36 pm

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
Seriously guys, look around you. There are married men and men with girlfriends everwhere. Are they all tough, wealthy, smooth-talking Adonises with pecs the size of footballs? Really?

The conversation had shifted to looks, which are essential. Of course the average man doesn't need to be some epitome of perfection. I don't think anyone here ever claimed that.

The average man is not super attractive, nor unforgivably ugly. The average man is simply that, average. Passable enough. The average man will indeed have relationships.

Looks are very much a spectrum, and there is indeed a point where some men do fall into the ugly camp. By "ugly camp," I mean very unappealing to the average woman. It's hard as men for us to discern this threshold when looking at other men. We may see both passable and ugly men as "average" in our eyes. But women are the choosers, and if the vast majority of women find a man unattractive, chances are he's in the ugly camp.

How you, as man, perceive the attractiveness/ugliness of the guy in your anecdotal, cherry-picked example is irrelevant.

So, what exactly is your argument?



PhosphorusDecree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2016
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,609
Location: Yorkshire, UK

08 Sep 2021, 5:37 pm

ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
PhosphorusDecree wrote:
Seriously guys, look around you. There are married men and men with girlfriends everwhere. Are they all tough, wealthy, smooth-talking Adonises with pecs the size of footballs? Really?

The conversation had shifted to looks, which are essential. Of course the average man doesn't need to be some epitome of perfection. I don't think anyone here ever claimed that.

The average man is not super attractive, nor unforgivably ugly. The average man is simply that, average. Passable enough. The average man will indeed have relationships.

Looks are very much a spectrum, and there is indeed a point where some men do fall into the ugly camp. By "ugly camp," I mean very unappealing to the average woman. It's hard as men for us to discern this threshold when looking at other men. We may see both passable and ugly men as "average" in our eyes. But women are the choosers, and if the vast majority of women find a man unattractive, chances are he's in the ugly camp.

How you, as man, perceive the attractiveness/ugliness of the guy in your anecdotal, cherry-picked example is irrelevant.

So, what exactly is your argument?


We do seem to be fighting two slightly different battles here....

I was specifically addressing the "alpha males get all the girls" argument which has been running all the way through this thread. My point was not that this man is in some way "objectively ugly," more that he does not check any of the boxes for the steroetypical "alpha male" and yet is romantically successful. And while he's a very obvious example of this trend, I think the point that the majority of men in relationships are not exceptional "alpha males" stands.

I've also noticed that women often have ideals of masculine beauty which are not reflected in their choice of actual partners, indicating that it's only one of many factors weighted in different ways. Again an anecdote (I am not a social scientist, OK!): one of my friends is a grade-A connoisseur of smokin' hot beefcake. Seriously, I have never seen another woman ogle a shirtless dancer so blatantly. Her boyfriend is none of that- he has the average physique of a middle-aged office worker. If she really wanted a muscular boyfriend, I reckon she could get one. He doesn't have an especially alpha-ey personality either- he's very quiet and self-effacing. I know she loathes macho types. Point is, in her personal romantic equation, she's clearly weighted personality as more important than looks. And the preferred personality is not one of those held up by incels as the kind who gets all the girls. I see this kind of thing over and over again. Should I really dissect the relationships of every woman I know?

Women's tastes seem to me to be both more variable and more complex than men's. And men aren't exactly simple either. The stereotype of a horde of shallow horndogs all lusting over slim, clear-skinned young women with huge breasts is absolute nonsense. (raises hand) I like fat girls. I am perfectly capable of feeling lust for women I don't like that much. I have fallen in love with women who weren't physically "my type." I'm more likely to attempt flirting with a woman whose taste in books is similar to mine than with a women in a low-cut top. None of these things are unusual for men; why should the equivalents be for women?

(I'm going to bed. Trying to express my point has involved so much repetition of phrases that even I'm sick of them!)


_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you


ezbzbfcg2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,977
Location: New Jersey, USA

08 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
Point is, in her personal romantic equation, she's clearly weighted personality as more important than looks.

Not exactly. Her husband may not be the supermodel type, but he still has to be good enough looking. If he were ugly, all the personality in the world wouldn't make up for it. I think it is somewhat common for some people, male and female, to not want a long-term relationship with a VERY good-looking person, as the worries of infidelity are greater.

However, it's incorrect to assume she found personality "more important" than looks. He may not be the sexiest man she's ever met, but he's not ugly. Again, he's average-looking. Average-looking men are commonly in relationships. Why do you assume it's really good-looking vs everyone else. In reality, it's good-looking vs average looking (passable) vs too-ugly-to-touch. And the line between average and ugly is very hard for men to spot in other men.

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
And the preferred personality is not one of those held up by incels as the kind who gets all the girls. I see this kind of thing over and over again. Should I really dissect the relationships of every woman I know?

I still see an incel as one who is involuntarily celibate, regardless of who they are. In this thread, the term is used like a political ideology. What personality do these political incels feel they need to get a girlfriend?

But no, I don't think you should dissect anything. Your examples sound truthful, but they're not really addressing the looks quotient. Your friend could have a relationship with a man she finds super sexy, but like most, settled for a more average (not ugly) looking man. There are those out there who are too ugly to pass; personality becomes meaningless. You still need passable looks (not necessarily really good looks) to at least get your foot in the door (like your friend's average-looking husband). So, rather than compare super-sexy to average...perhaps the correct approach is to compare average to the bottom-rung.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

09 Sep 2021, 8:19 am

ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I still see an incel as one who is involuntarily celibate, regardless of who they are. In this thread, the term is used like a political ideology...
Excerpt from  Texas Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment, January 2020, page 3 
Quote:
Although not a new movement, Involuntary Celibates (Incels) are an emerging domestic terrorism threat as current adherents demonstrate marked acts or threats of violence in furtherance of their social grievance.  Once viewed as a criminal threat by many law enforcement authorities, Incels are now seen as a growing domestic terrorism concern due to the ideological nature of recent Incel attacks internationally, nationwide, and in Texas.  What begins as a personal grievance due to perceived rejection by women may morph into allegiance to, and attempts to further, an Incel Rebellion.  The result has thrust the Incel movement into the realm of domestic terrorism.  The violence demonstrated by Incels in the past decade, coupled with extremely violent online rhetoric, suggests this particular threat could soon match, or potentially eclipse, the level of lethalness demonstrated by other domestic terrorism types.
You cannot get much more political than that.



that1weirdgrrrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,090
Location: Between my dreams and your fantasies

09 Sep 2021, 11:21 am

If you're "bottom-rung-ugly" try dating a blind girl?


_________________
...what do the public, the great unobservant public, who could hardly tell a weaver by his tooth or a compositor by his left thumb, care about the finer shades of analysis and deduction!


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

09 Sep 2021, 11:25 am

that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
If you're "bottom-rung-ugly" try dating a blind girl?
If you are "bottom-rung-ugly", take up the guitar and learn to sing the Blues.

I am so ugly, ugly as sin
Oh yes! I am ugly, ugly as sin
I am so sad and lonely and ugly
My dog won't even let me in.



ProfessorJohn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,153
Location: The Room at the end of 2001

09 Sep 2021, 12:32 pm

that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
If you're "bottom-rung-ugly" try dating a blind girl?


That worked for the Toxic Avenger!