Friendship with the opposite sex vs sexual selection.....

Page 6 of 8 [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

edgewaters
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,427
Location: Ontario

07 May 2012, 5:38 am

MXH wrote:
i think this is incorrect, while personality does play a role I do notice most women start off of physical looks and then hope theres personality behind them


There's a lot of information conveyed in things like posture, interaction, etc. Plus they gather information about people indirectly, through social networks.

That's part of why aspies have so much trouble. I don't think there's are any physical characteristics associated with AS (I could be wrong though).



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

07 May 2012, 5:44 am

edgewaters wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Many men are repulsed by the chemistry crap as well (you're either attracted to someone or you're not—science of matter has nothing to do with it).


Pheromones.

But I think the term is not entirely literal, refers to social processes as well.


If feromones were relevant, all the dating challenges in the world would be a perfume bottle away.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

07 May 2012, 5:47 am

MXH wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
edgewaters wrote:

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


Agreed.


i think this is incorrect, while personality does play a role I do notice most women start off of physical looks and then hope theres personality behind them


I once posted a picture of me flexing muscles on an open social network community. I got 15 winks in one day + numerous letters. I then changed to a picture where I did not and girls hit on me much less. Allthough I wasn't really buff back then, I was ripped like Tyler Durden.



rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

07 May 2012, 6:07 am

edgewaters wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
While I see what you are saying. The fact I asked *Her* out and not her friend, or a girl who looked like her friend, is the missing clue. Once you have that, you can easily gain the rest of the information needed.


How? It's a single point on a scale. She has no idea where she even is on that scale, except that she's above some certain minimum. There is absolutely no way to even guess where anyone else could possibly place. Perhaps from just general intuition, she could have guessed that her friend occupied a less desirable position, but there's no way to tell whether it met the minimum or not. Theoretically, it would even be possible for her friend to be higher on the scale - it stands to reason that you'd be aiming somewhere around the middle.

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


I don't believe that fairytale wishy washy crap. Girls all have the "less hot" friend who they take with them places to make themselves look better. Thought granted it may be subconscious, You can see it all the time. Some girls even make it a point to ONLY associate with unattractive girls so they are the BEST looking in the group.

I think what you seem to be missing is, if I asked her out, the logical assumption is I found her to be attractive and therefore another girl who is at least as attractive as her would be the ideal replacement. not a girl who is multiple levels below her.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

07 May 2012, 6:22 am

Kurgan wrote:
MXH wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
edgewaters wrote:

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


Agreed.


i think this is incorrect, while personality does play a role I do notice most women start off of physical looks and then hope theres personality behind them


I once posted a picture of me flexing muscles on an open social network community. I got 15 winks in one day + numerous letters. I then changed to a picture where I did not and girls hit on me much less. Allthough I wasn't really buff back then, I was ripped like Tyler Durden.


Yep, i had signed to a site that has member of the oposite sex judge you to enter. My good quality picture which i feel portrayed a bit of my personality was denied yet the one where i was shirtless and posing made it in. I then added the other picture and theres quite thr diference in ratigs



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,095
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

07 May 2012, 7:33 am

MXH wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
MXH wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
edgewaters wrote:

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


Agreed.


i think this is incorrect, while personality does play a role I do notice most women start off of physical looks and then hope theres personality behind them


I once posted a picture of me flexing muscles on an open social network community. I got 15 winks in one day + numerous letters. I then changed to a picture where I did not and girls hit on me much less. Allthough I wasn't really buff back then, I was ripped like Tyler Durden.


Yep, i had signed to a site that has member of the oposite sex judge you to enter. My good quality picture which i feel portrayed a bit of my personality was denied yet the one where i was shirtless and posing made it in. I then added the other picture and theres quite thr diference in ratigs


Also it's noticeable how predictable the outcome on this website, based on the first hour of rating you can guess the final outcome (same), as if the whole bunch has the same taste in looks.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

07 May 2012, 8:07 am

Yep, that part was very true. It seems your ration only goes down with time, never up



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,095
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

07 May 2012, 11:39 am

MXH wrote:
Yep, that part was very true. It seems your ration only goes down with time, never up



With that pic

Image

i got those results:

Image

And i bet it won't change much.

I did according to hyper's link, i didn't smile, I am looking away but .... Lol



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

07 May 2012, 11:43 am

MXH wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
edgewaters wrote:

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


Agreed.


i think this is incorrect, while personality does play a role I do notice most women start off of physical looks and then hope theres personality behind them



We're tasking quite specifically here about match making, and he is right about how women match make. How we select mates, that has been beaten to death, and a lot of it may be subconscious. In that case, it varies.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

07 May 2012, 11:58 am

rabbittss wrote:
edgewaters wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
While I see what you are saying. The fact I asked *Her* out and not her friend, or a girl who looked like her friend, is the missing clue. Once you have that, you can easily gain the rest of the information needed.


How? It's a single point on a scale. She has no idea where she even is on that scale, except that she's above some certain minimum. There is absolutely no way to even guess where anyone else could possibly place. Perhaps from just general intuition, she could have guessed that her friend occupied a less desirable position, but there's no way to tell whether it met the minimum or not. Theoretically, it would even be possible for her friend to be higher on the scale - it stands to reason that you'd be aiming somewhere around the middle.

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


I don't believe that fairytale wishy washy crap. Girls all have the "less hot" friend who they take with them places to make themselves look better. Thought granted it may be subconscious, You can see it all the time. Some girls even make it a point to ONLY associate with unattractive girls so they are the BEST looking in the group.

I think what you seem to be missing is, if I asked her out, the logical assumption is I found her to be attractive and therefore another girl who is at least as attractive as her would be the ideal replacement. not a girl who is multiple levels below her.

no, they don't. wow. just wow.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

07 May 2012, 12:01 pm

rabbittss wrote:
edgewaters wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
While I see what you are saying. The fact I asked *Her* out and not her friend, or a girl who looked like her friend, is the missing clue. Once you have that, you can easily gain the rest of the information needed.


How? It's a single point on a scale. She has no idea where she even is on that scale, except that she's above some certain minimum. There is absolutely no way to even guess where anyone else could possibly place. Perhaps from just general intuition, she could have guessed that her friend occupied a less desirable position, but there's no way to tell whether it met the minimum or not. Theoretically, it would even be possible for her friend to be higher on the scale - it stands to reason that you'd be aiming somewhere around the middle.

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


I don't believe that fairytale wishy washy crap. Girls all have the "less hot" friend who they take with them places to make themselves look better. Thought granted it may be subconscious, You can see it all the time. Some girls even make it a point to ONLY associate with unattractive girls so they are the BEST looking in the group.

I think what you seem to be missing is, if I asked her out, the logical assumption is I found her to be attractive and therefore another girl who is at least as attractive as her would be the ideal replacement. not a girl who is multiple levels below her.


There is no "all" here. And, in fact, I disagree that it would even be most. In my experience, women tend to go on the prowl with women of similar attractiveness, which is actually more successful in general. Just because YOU see one hot girl in the group, does not mean SHE sees herself that way, OR that a different guy will pick the SAME woman as being the most attractive. You are far too hung up on the idea that there is one universal scale and that everyone knows what it is. That just is not the way it works.

In my single years, there were two groups I had gone out socially with. Early on, was the group created by my tiny, cute, blond friend. That was a such a dud for me, because despite the fact that I do not think my friend is particulary pretty, she is a prime flirt and men tend to think based on her looks that she is the sweetest thing ever to walk this earth, and there wasn't much group interaction. And, no one ever ended up dating, not even her, given that 99% of the time she passed over a fake phone number. Later, I went out with a group of diverse personailties and look types, no one stunning and no one who looked like a charity case, and it was easier to interact with groups of guys where one found himself drawn to A, another drawn to B, and so on. That results in dates. Point being, women aren't dumb, and few are going to stick with the arrangement you described long, so even though it probably does happen, it is NOT "all." You only think it is because, perhaps, at this point in your life, you only have eyes for those kinds of women.


In the end, of course, I didn't end up married to anyone from any of that. I married my sister's very good male friend. So old fashioned ;)


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


Last edited by DW_a_mom on 07 May 2012, 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

07 May 2012, 12:06 pm

rabbittss wrote:
edgewaters wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
While I see what you are saying. The fact I asked *Her* out and not her friend, or a girl who looked like her friend, is the missing clue. Once you have that, you can easily gain the rest of the information needed.


How? It's a single point on a scale. She has no idea where she even is on that scale, except that she's above some certain minimum. There is absolutely no way to even guess where anyone else could possibly place. Perhaps from just general intuition, she could have guessed that her friend occupied a less desirable position, but there's no way to tell whether it met the minimum or not. Theoretically, it would even be possible for her friend to be higher on the scale - it stands to reason that you'd be aiming somewhere around the middle.

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


I don't believe that fairytale wishy washy crap. Girls all have the "less hot" friend who they take with them places to make themselves look better. Thought granted it may be subconscious, You can see it all the time. Some girls even make it a point to ONLY associate with unattractive girls so they are the BEST looking in the group.

I think what you seem to be missing is, if I asked her out, the logical assumption is I found her to be attractive and therefore another girl who is at least as attractive as her would be the ideal replacement. not a girl who is multiple levels below her.


For once, I disagree with you. Pretty girls have pretty friends and ugly girls have ugly friends. I see this at my university more or less everyday.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

07 May 2012, 12:07 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
MXH wrote:
Yep, that part was very true. It seems your ration only goes down with time, never up



With that pic



And i bet it won't change much.

I did according to hyper's link, i didn't smile, I am looking away but .... Lol


Can I say this as a piece of advice? WHY do you take your pictures looking up at your face? It is sooo unflattering, everything is out of proportion. If you want the best results, find the most flattering angle for YOU, and forget all the stats.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

07 May 2012, 12:18 pm

DW_a_mom wrote:
MXH wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
edgewaters wrote:

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


Agreed.


i think this is incorrect, while personality does play a role I do notice most women start off of physical looks and then hope theres personality behind them


We're tasking quite specifically here about match making, and he is right about how women match make. How we select mates, that has been beaten to death, and a lot of it may be subconscious. In that case, it varies.


Then specify that. Dont assume that women dont like eye candy and that a great personality is all thats needed. Sure it helps, but its not going to open doors, rather just keep them open.

Im quite sure that finding someone by looks and then seeing if they have personality is exactly how men operate.



Zinia
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 344

07 May 2012, 12:30 pm

Kurgan wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
edgewaters wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
While I see what you are saying. The fact I asked *Her* out and not her friend, or a girl who looked like her friend, is the missing clue. Once you have that, you can easily gain the rest of the information needed.


How? It's a single point on a scale. She has no idea where she even is on that scale, except that she's above some certain minimum. There is absolutely no way to even guess where anyone else could possibly place. Perhaps from just general intuition, she could have guessed that her friend occupied a less desirable position, but there's no way to tell whether it met the minimum or not. Theoretically, it would even be possible for her friend to be higher on the scale - it stands to reason that you'd be aiming somewhere around the middle.

Most women don't think in terms of the chunky scale or whatever you want to call what you're operating by. They think more along the lines of personalities that will get along, chemistry, that sort of thing. The concept of some sort of hierarchical scale of partners based on physical attributes is generally alien to them (outside of cardboard representations, i.e. in the real world), and generally its an idea most women would be repulsed by. You've got to appreciate she'd have to assign qualities (that she considers extremely negative) to your personality, to even grasp your scale criteria. Maybe she didn't think of you that way.


I don't believe that fairytale wishy washy crap. Girls all have the "less hot" friend who they take with them places to make themselves look better. Thought granted it may be subconscious, You can see it all the time. Some girls even make it a point to ONLY associate with unattractive girls so they are the BEST looking in the group.

I think what you seem to be missing is, if I asked her out, the logical assumption is I found her to be attractive and therefore another girl who is at least as attractive as her would be the ideal replacement. not a girl who is multiple levels below her.


For once, I disagree with you. Pretty girls have pretty friends and ugly girls have ugly friends. I see this at my university more or less everyday.


I think there is slight truth in this, as people tend to group together by interest/upbringing. SO if you're into women with gobs and gobs of makeup dripping off their faces, and hair that has been bleached to oblivion, you're likely to see them grouped together b/c they share a common interest: makeup. Or, girls who are very athletic may go out with other athletic girls because they all do their karate class/weight lifting together. Very affluent girls will flock together, and they will obviously have more access to plastic surgery than someone from the working class. People don't do this intentionally, IMO, and only rarely will one girl be manipulative enough to purposefully bring a girl she thinks is "ugly" with her to pick up people. Of course, girls, just like men, come in all shapes and flavors--manipulative or genuine. Plus, there are always people who make friendships with people who are very different from them in appearance or personality--although it is common for groups to form around similarities.

Also, ethnic backgrounds often tend to flock together, not intentionally. My best friend in grade school was Greek/Mexican Indian. My best friend in high school was German/Latino. I'm English/Mexican Indian, and we just happened to get along together, not because we purposefully chose out people who looked the same--but it ended up that we did have a similar Anglo Euro/Latino Indigenous background.

Ultimately though--beauty is subjective. Who you find beautiful will not always find herself beautiful, nor will she be seen as beautiful by every guy. This is the truth I will definitely stand by.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

07 May 2012, 12:32 pm

I'm thinking I'm not organizing my thoughts all that well and, to be honest, I'm not really enjoying putting my head back into the dating world. It isn't the happiest place for me; too much guessing what other people think and most people getting it wrong (nothing personal to anyone, but that IS the world of dating). I just get this funny idea sometimes that I can help someone short cut some of the learning process and get better results ... Well, like I said, it's a funny idea.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).