The masculine role in society

Page 6 of 6 [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

aspiesandra27
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 825
Location: london

20 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm

ManicDan, it's not like that. I get mad as a result of overloading. When I cannot get away from people (this is mainly at work or if I have to go out shopping) I tend to get angry and swear. Even walking down the road and someone obstructs my way, I get angry. If someone tickles me, or touches me "wrong" or talks too loud or a million other things. I have a ton of sensory issues and cannot control my reaction to them. If I could be a hermit, then it would be ideal.



Magnus_Rex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,704
Location: Home

20 Nov 2012, 1:57 pm

aspiesandra27 wrote:
ManicDan, it's not like that. I get mad as a result of overloading. When I cannot get away from people (this is mainly at work or if I have to go out shopping) I tend to get angry and swear. Even walking down the road and someone obstructs my way, I get angry. If someone tickles me, or touches me "wrong" or talks too loud or a million other things. I have a ton of sensory issues and cannot control my reaction to them. If I could be a hermit, then it would be ideal.

When you put it that way, yes, I do feel anger. Commuting does that to a person. But it is a temporary feeling; it only lasts a few minutes at most.

As for fear, I do not know. For example, I was robbed two times; the first I chased after the thieves. The second time, I did not feel afraid, but instead of reacting, I just convinced them to take a broken cell phone I had while telling them I had no money in my wallet (which was lie; I had a little money with me).


_________________
DISCLAIMER: It should be noted that, while I strongly suspect I have Asperger's syndrome, I am not diagnosed. Nevertheless, my score on RAADS-R is 186, which makes me a pretty RAAD guy.

Sorry for this terrible joke, by the way.


ShamelessGit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 718
Location: Kansas

20 Nov 2012, 4:08 pm

Magnus_Rex wrote:
Sexism is just like the racism issue: the best way to get over it is by stopping talking about it.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s[/youtube]
Personally, I never really thought on terms of gender roles. While I do fit two of the Man Box items (never showing emotions and never showing weaknesses), it is due to my strong alexithymia. I treat everybody as equals, regardless of their gender, race, ammount of limbs and mental state. Just ask any of my friends.

P.S.: I only recently found that Morgan Freeman video, but I am very satisfied to find that he thinks exactly like me on that matter. I admire the guy even more now.


Morgan freedman is right. I have had the same opinion for a long time, but I didn't know he shared it too. Usually people call me racist when I try to make that argument.



Magnus_Rex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,704
Location: Home

20 Nov 2012, 4:30 pm

ShamelessGit wrote:
Morgan freedman is right. I have had the same opinion for a long time, but I didn't know he shared it too. Usually people call me racist when I try to make that argument.

I also have the same opinions. In fact, during this year's International Women's Day, two teachers tried to make the guys on our class deliver small gifts to the girls. I refused and I began a discourse on how having a single day of the year to honor women is ridiculous and sexist because: 1. we should stop making distinctions based on gender, color, religion, political views and so on and; 2. by that stupid logic, if we want things to be "equal", we need an International Men's Day.

Besides, IWD is not even a holiday. It is useless. :roll:

Unfortunately, my classmates had mixed reactions. Apparently, they thought I had some good points, but they insisted on keeping the date for no specific reason. One of the teachers (who is a woman) apparently agreed with me. Which means it was not a complete waste of time, after all.


_________________
DISCLAIMER: It should be noted that, while I strongly suspect I have Asperger's syndrome, I am not diagnosed. Nevertheless, my score on RAADS-R is 186, which makes me a pretty RAAD guy.

Sorry for this terrible joke, by the way.


Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

20 Nov 2012, 7:45 pm

aspiesandra27 wrote:
Magnus Rex I am interested in your alexithymia. I suspect someone I know has that condition too and have read substantial amounts of literature on the matter.

However, I have never spoken to anyone who admits having it. Do you just have a hard time showing emotion, or do not know how to externalise it?


I have it too. It varies between degrees and types though.

BlueMax wrote:
Can't argue with that, but the current approach to eliminating roles seems to also eliminate the gender... It's not society that decides how boys and girls behave... we have a certain amount of hard-wiring built in from birth that no amount of "reprogramming" will ever truly eliminate.

Boys act differently, learn differently, behave differently, want different things - and that's perfectly normal! Sure, eliminate roles and expectations - let men be homemakers and florists if they want! But our approach to this (in North America at least) for the last few generations, has been to treat boys like girls and hope they don't act like the boys they are - then maybe they'll grow up to be non-threatening. They filled the boy scouts with girls and angry moms and all but removed male teachers from schools. This approach is just not working for equality... it punishes the whole gender for being what it is - different.

It's time for a combination of new and old... some things we knew 100 years ago really were for the best, like boys and girls separate classes, etc.

I'm rambling... I hope I made my point at least. :oops:


I'm not trying to deny or get rid of anything biological... not at all.
Just would like some to realise that biology doesn't dictate everything... and when those differences occur we need to be much more flexible about them.
I do not agree with what the education systems and such have turned into.

That article you provided on boys actually described *my* experience of school perfectly.
It's one of the reasons that I almost dropped out of school at 14.
They treated me like a girl (although I am one) and it almost completely put me off education for life. (it was much the same when they forced me into girl scouts - oh the horror)

hyperlexian wrote:
if it seems like you (or anyone else) are not understanding what i am trying to say, then i reword it until i think t is as clear as i can make it. if you were agreeing with me, then why didn't you actually... agree? you kept referring back to the main definition and telling me i wasn't getting your point... that is *not* agreement. :? perhaps the issue is not that i am not understanding your point, but rather your responses are combative and come in opposition to me. if you agree.... then agree with me! :lol:


I didn't realise that - seeking clarifcation until I could understand your point - and then making an observation (one I can verify with proof) simply because I was confused - is considered combative to you. :lol:


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Last edited by Kjas on 21 Nov 2012, 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

ShamelessGit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 718
Location: Kansas

20 Nov 2012, 11:54 pm

It seems like whenever somebody posts something that has the potential to be controversial, a lot of other people post comments trying to refute things that the original poster did not actually say, but are related to what he/she said by the subject matter. It is like they were waiting to be able to make that argument and they made it as soon as they thought they saw an opportunity, and it is of little importance to them whether the person they are arguing with actually holds that position. Or maybe they think with boxes and think that because the OP thinks X, he/she must also think Y, because position Y is similar to a position that many people with position X have. Whenever I post a controversial subject (sometimes they are much more controversial than this), I have to write several posts clarifying what I did not say.



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

21 Nov 2012, 1:37 am

Yes but that is called making assumptions and doing such things also means you're taking things out of context, and not taking someone's previous actions, behaviour and personality into account.
It tends to be a bad combination and a very unproductive one.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

21 Nov 2012, 4:46 am

Don't animals have gender roles too? Most mammal species at least?

I think there's some truth in bluemax's words.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

21 Nov 2012, 4:59 am

Kjas wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
if it seems like you (or anyone else) are not understanding what i am trying to say, then i reword it until i think t is as clear as i can make it. if you were agreeing with me, then why didn't you actually... agree? you kept referring back to the main definition and telling me i wasn't getting your point... that is *not* agreement. :? perhaps the issue is not that i am not understanding your point, but rather your responses are combative and come in opposition to me. if you agree.... then agree with me! :lol:


I didn't realise that - seeking clarifcation until I could understand your point - and then making an observation (one I can verify with proof) simply because I was confused - is considered combative to you. :lol:

opposition can be combative. it sort of depends. in this case you flipped from an on-topic discussion to a personal observation about me. i am sure you can see the difference.

you are making an interesting case because on the one hand you were obviously not agreeing with me, then you complained about me not agreeing with you. :lol: if you think we are in agreement, then your point has not been made clearly enough yet. you have not yet even tried to demonstrate that we arguing the same side, so i don't really understand why i would be agreeing with you. :scratch:

(but i'll not say more on that, as it's not really on topic. if you had any questions about what i actually stated in my posts, i am happy to discuss that)


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

22 Nov 2012, 3:56 am

I come here to discuss things I am curious about in order to arrive at the truth, that requires discussion, and to clarify where necessary, and discuss details thoroughly - not to oppose, be "combative" or on some ego trip - all of those last 3 things directly get in the way of finding the truth and therefore are of no use to me.
I did the same I would with any other, it's just interesting that you almost always take such and interpret it as combative - most don't.

I made the personal observation, because I was not just talking about this thread, but rather about 90% or more of posts you have addressed to me - this has been a repeat pattern, one that has confused me before, but I simply have not stated it until now, when I could be sure of it.

I did not complain about you not agreeing with me. I said we were attempting to make the same point.
The incorrect assumptions and projections - without taking into account context, previous things and personality were what bothered me.

Just because I agree with one particular solution with you in this case, does not necessarily mean that I agree with the motives, or the premise that lead you to that conclusion - in fact, ours are markedly different. The premise and motives one has usually heavily influence the solution they come up with, and also the means with which they choose to implement it. Undoubtably we would have different means. And yes it matters - get the right end but choose to the wrong means to implement it and you have just created another short term solution that not only will not last - but will actively create more problems due to it.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

22 Nov 2012, 6:08 am

Quote:
It's time for a combination of new and old... some things we knew 100 years ago really were for the best, like boys and girls separate classes, etc.


There are parts i agree, but from my opinion they send you to a wrong solution.

I agree with you, that there are statistic gender differences. But its not about machines, its about humans. So meaning that there are differen statistic centers in behaviour etc... also means, that there are boys and girls who are far away from the statistic center of their gender.

So my english is not good, but maybe an examples helps to understand what i mean. So women normally have feet around size 39 (european size) and men around 42. So yes there are statistic differences and we should not ignore them. But a small amount of women do have feet size 42, just like a small amount of men has feet size 39. And they are not wrong or anything, as we are no machines, there is astatistic spread and thats normal.

So when you say, we should go back to earlier times where all boys were teached as boys and all girls were teached as girls, it would mean for the example: All girls had to wear shoes size 39. Also the few girls that have feet size 42 and who would suffer from that. Also the few boys who have feet size 39. Forcing them to wear shoes with feet size 42, just because the statistic middle of men are wearing feet size 42, is not the right thing to do if they have feet size 39..

From my opinion we should just accept, that boys and grils are different genders with a statistic different behaviour in some points. But this means also to accept that there are some boys and girls who are out of their statistic middle.

Or as example again: I would not tell every girl to become an engineer and every boy to become visagist. But if a girls sem to fit in as engineer, or a boy seems to be more happier when learning a statistic "womenjob", then we should accept that also. Because as there is a different statistic middle for genders in behaviour etc... , which we should accept and where i agree with you, there are these standing on the side of the statistic center.

So i am female engineer on my own, and still i totally agree that there are differences. Most women are for me as strange, as they are for men i think. I do not understand all that stuff about shoes and handbags, and accesoires, and star magazines, and make up and to be in social situations with women is really horror for me, because most of them expect a typical female behaviour which i only can pretend.

Ok, now with 33 years i am tested and diagnosed and from the testing i got scores that are even for men extreme and are far, far, far away from womens statistic middle. So there was nothing wrong about it, when i choose to go to engineer school as a girl, in which i was interested. My dad did not agree with me first, but i fought to do a aptitude test, and the test (and the second harder test, because my father still was not sure about it. ^^) confirmed, that this school would be great and fit my interests by any means.

Its also a fact, that handling social situations with girls was always harder for me then with boys. I did not understand the games really, and i am talking of kindergarten age and younger and as i already told, my parents are faaaar away from any "All genders are the same stuff.", so nobody told me that i should not play with dolls, my parents bought me some like every girl, and I was happy to be gifted and played with them from my opinion. So i built them houses from carton and so on, but this "I let the puppet talk and have thougths and so on...." stuff, with which i was confronted in kindergarten, i did not understood. Why shoult i talk with the puppet, as if it was a baby? Its a puppet? Or when someone said that my puppet would be sad and that stuff. Its a thing, it cant be sad. So it was a toy for me, that i accepted and never thought about any gender things, but to imagine it would be a baby or anything never came on my mind and seemed to be totally freaky. I mean i knwo that it was not alive, because i dismantled them to the parts and built it together again, interested in how the joint worked, why the eyes were closing, when i lay it down, how the hair was fixed in the inside and so on....

So i totally agree with me, that there are statistic differences for genders, because if tehre were not typical femal behaviour i would not have experienced, that i am not fitting in. But please, give the few freaks like me, that are existing, the free opportunity to accept to be different.and to act just as it fits in for them. :) If i get a daughter someday, its completely normal and ok for me, when she likes to play with dolls. (I am only afraid that she wants to play doll games together with me. Not i wouldnt do it, but i am afraid not to do it "right".) But if not, i wont let her beg 10 years for her first LEGO like my father did. ^^



Stalk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,138

22 Nov 2012, 7:17 am

The fairness test

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8mynrRd7Ak#![/youtube]



Noodlebug
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 127

25 Nov 2012, 9:26 am

I pretty much avoid relationships at this point because of this. I value my individuality over being a masculine rock for a woman.



WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,175
Location: California, United States

05 Dec 2012, 5:55 pm

love the fight scene in Dark Knight Rises between Batman and Bane, the first fight scene



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,490
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

05 Dec 2012, 9:09 pm

belikeh2o wrote:
The kind of girl "looking for a real man" obviously doesn't know one when she sees one. That's just my take anyway. I'm seriously a wolf in sheep's clothing and some girls just have no clue what I'd even begin to do to your typical macho man. Most "men" don't really train martial arts for survival. Most "men" are hardly concerned with survival which makes me question the title they've been given. Sure they'll "stand up for their girl" but my girl should know if I'm gonna step up to someone I'm damn near gonna kill them, which is why I let things slide and keep walking. I'm kind of tired of the neurotypical puppet show anyway. I refuse to let common misconceptions about what makes a man define who I am. Don't let it affect you either. You're probably not trying to impress those girls anyway. Seriously, how many of those "men" can fish and hunt and cook and clean their own game? Harvest and plant according to season? Build from natural materials? Not usually the same type of guy who's "got game."

:star: :star: :star: :star: :star:

I'm at the same point - including the martial arts, the education, the knowledge, the sort of inner achievements; people's image of me based on what kind of 'vibe' I have and whether it comes off as macho or not is getting to be of less and less concern to me.

If I hear you right you're really saying back at the world in so many ways "I know who I am. Do you?" and when it seems like its churlishness making most of the barriers (like people's highschool-minded judgements) that it really feels like someone's trying to put a bib on you and feed you their baby food.

This is partly why I'm only so concerned with where I end up in the relationship world - I'm coming to be whole of my own even without a relationship. I prefer to keep myself the chooser as well, stay in the drivers seat, and decide who gets to share my private space with me.


I still have to watch this video yet but it looks like it could have some interesting things innit.



WantToHaveALife
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,175
Location: California, United States

22 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm

maybe i should castrate myself