sly279 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The safest approach is to let the woman touches you first.
No doubt about that. But it seems many won't touch you; they'll ditch you and find a man who does take the risk.
Sexting before meeting the potential date destroys all these rules that Cannibal talked about, it makes things go faster physically - with zero risk. All of these did touch me (hands, thighs, shoulder) on the very first date when that happened. But with no-prior-sexting dates, things went slowly and to nowhere.
Are you saying without sexting it won’t work out?
We haven’t talked about anything remotely about sex. I’ve avoided any such discussions
For me at least it never worked if no sexting before the 1st date, no 2nd date at all in the without scenario, I know I know...it's extremely freaking weird.
I think sexting already creates this 'chemistry' thing that a lot of women talk about - and when I meet them and I look what they fantasized about, the "chemistry" goes on. Also the sexting in prior scenario makes them see my naughty side, while in the without sexting cases I am probably just another normal below average guy, sexually invisible to them, nothing triggers their sexual thoughts.
I strongly believe, that 'chemistry' they talk about is the sexual sensation/thoughts or mental fantasy (for some fractions of moments at least) during the date. If the whole date period passes and nothing triggered that sensation or these thoughts then they would feel that there was no 'chemistry', and hence no second date.
I think aliens should abduct me and study my weird case.
This is our 3rd date no sexting.
Past women we sexted a lot but never met up for a date, they ended things before.