Sex

Post Reply New Topic

For me that hasn't been so true. I have been in relationships where we have not been getting along and at the times don't really like each other at all but we still have had sex. It is meaningless. Still it is enjoyable. During the interaction I don't think nothing of the other person and don't think they do me either. It's just sex and when it's finished - I don't say nothing and just leave or vice versa they go. We don't even speak to each other. Apart from saying do you wanna do this or them asking me to.

Accountants, computer programmers, and whoever else, saying they lead, dull boring lives would be a generalization because we don't know how they live their lives individually.

But to the matter at hand, prostitutes. We know what prostitutes do by profession. Tell me, what self respecting woman would let guys have sex with her for money? Tell me, is that something you think is "honorable" or merely a "job". Why would a woman to do such a thing? Something isn't quite right with the picture.

Yes, I suppose from a non-religious standpoint, it can be viewed as "just a job" or an acceptable occupation available for women to be engaged in, so that can men let their sexual needs out for a price. However, religiously speaking, it is sinful behavior in God's eyes. I'm not cursing prostitutes and saying they're going to burn in Hell, that is not for me to say, that is for God to say and God to say alone. However, He has made it perfectly clear through scripture in the Bible that sexual immorality of any kind is sinful. Prostitutes can do whatever they want, I have no say in what they do, but I know that what they do is sinful to God.

I have my own sins too, and I don't think I'm perfect, but pointing out that it is considered sinful under God's eyes, as it is written in the Bible. I'm sure you're going to say that I'm judging them and "judge not lest you yourself be judged", but I never say anything hateful or cruel about them or thought them unworthy of life, and everything I've said has been backed up by scripture, these are not my base opinions, but God's words. I'm just pointing out that they must be sad people if they take delight in what they do, or they do it because of some other reason.

Jesus has the final say in all matters, I'm not arguing about that. But the Bible is God's own Word, correct? So everything said in it is exactly what God/Jesus wants and expects of us as his children.

I'm sure you remember the story where a bunch of Jews were about to stone a women because she was an adulteress. Jesus told them "He who is without sin cast the first stone", and they left. Then He said to the woman "Stand up, your sins are forgiven, go and sin no more".

Jesus wants to save as many people as possible on this Earth as He can because He loves us all. Those who accept Jesus Christ as their Savior and repent of their sins will be forgiven, as the Bible says. I'm not saying prostitutes are cannon fodder for Hell, but I am saying that if they don't repent of their sins and continue in their sin when they die, they will go to Hell, the Bible makes it abundantly clear. These are not my words, but God's Word. As long as there is life and breath in a person, they have a chance to be saved, but when they're dead, it's game over.

"Judging" would be calling/thinking them unworthy of life, and thinking that they are disgusting, vile, immoral women who are automatically Hell bound after they die. We all are guilty of sin, but God makes it clear the kinds of people who will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven if they continue in their sin.

Revelations 21:6-8

"He said to me: "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give drink without cost from the spring of the water of life. He who overcomes will inherit all this, and I will be his God and he will be my son. But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars- their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death."

I try and follow the path of Kali Ma so most of Jesus/God's righteousness is irrevelant to me... /:

Women get forced to play games. Like the sex roles of what men want. It may seem subtle and not noticable to some and to others it's very noticable. I guess it depends on the guy. However, most men are sexually domineering and aggressive in ways that women are not.

I have experimented and tried to be as domineering in that respect; as to feel equal and as strong. Even more sexually aggressive than they but it does never seem to work. It always feels like they take over. Most women enjoy that, as I do and pleasantly get use to. It feels natural to me.

I can be pretty bossy and domineering in relationships. With my own sexual fetishes and have noticed that my boyfriends have really enjoyed me going off with my own style.

However, I find that I'm the one that mostly does as I'm told or as directed to. Naturally I'm submissive. I have rebelled against this with experimenting but have found that it has really not made any difference. When push comes to shoove - it is just the same' ol same 'ol. That doesn't bother me because sex could never bore me. I love it.

It doesn't seem to matter what postion your in. Wether your the person that chooses or your on top - it still feels as though men are the sexually dominant.

that indiana jones guy who takes out your heart


and f**k jesus he has no place in my life
i'll have sex without thinking he is watching me
(he is a creepy guy)

*stares at the dominos advertisement in the bottom left corner of the screen while stomach demands dinner*

Oh, sorry, I was a bit sidetracked. Now, now, where were we? Oh yes, the guy asking how he can get sex "with female". (Love the grammar by the way)

My tips,
Unless you're either lucky or willing to put up with a lot of s**t, you're not getting into a woman's pants unless she happens to be a hooker, or an escort or whatever. Assessing your situation, I'd recommend just getting a hooker and not telling your friends. Is that really that hard? That's mainly all I've got to say.

Jesus likes his porn live.

Thats because it wasn't supposed to be love. There are many thrills in life that has nothing to do with love. Casual sex happens to be one of them.

Excuse me, but I know that many self respecting women like to have guys use them as a pin cushion, simply because they are using them for pleasure as well. The point in these actions are fun and relief of stress, which is something both sides benifit from. Also, there are just as many sad prostitutes as there are happy ones, so saying most of them have a tragic life story isn't accurate.

Only according to your sense of morality. Sure, not all pimps are nice guys, however I also know that not all of them are abusive, and not all prostitutes work for pimps. Many are actually independant workers.
Also, you mention how a pimp can be controlling. Have you ever considered how your god controls you with fear, saying "no you can't act on your natural impulses, thats a sin, and if you sin well, your ass is mine!!" Now THAT sounds like a sad existance/life story.

Ok, it says that in a book. Did you know that in other books it says you will be met with almost a hundred virgins in heaven in which you can bang all day? Give me a break. Sex of any kind under eachothers consent is not "wrong" in any way, it's nature (even within other animals besides humans as well). Some just like to use this pleasure for income.

"There is a reason" -- but you don't say what it is, for the non-religious anyway.


What about arranged marriages? Marriages that are on the rocks? Sex therapists and relationship experts recommend sex as one method of reconnecting with an estranged spouse.


It was also a mistake because it's not true in general. Deep love and caring is not a prerequisite for marriage. (Not that it's a bad thing!) And releasing sexual lust is not a bad thing either.


This is an accurate observation many times, but certainly not always. But even if it were always true, it is morally irrelevant.


Yes, he wants sex without romance. What's wrong with sex without romance? This was my point with the married couple + quickie comment. They're not being romantic at all -- just humping.


Wanting women for sex is not at all the same as degrading or dehumanizing someone, or abandoning them afterwards.


No, but that's not the point. You said that being around them was wrong.

I agree. I'm not of the opinion that sex should be bought and sold in general, but at least prostitutes are honest about selling it.

Yes sadly the media make her out to be this goddess who wants nothing more than to steal the hearts of men. What rubbish.....

Technically, nobody is worthy of salvation on their own, except they attain it through Jesus Christ. If He spent His time on Earth eating with sinners and associating with the tax gatherers and prostitutes, what makes you say He wouldn't let them in as well? Plus, ignoring that, if said prostitutes were to repent later in life, wouldn't they receive the same reward? (I'm referring to the parable of the workers in the vineyard here...)

Bali mangthi Kali Ma...
Mukti degi Kali Ma...
Kali Ma...
KALI MAAAAA...
KALI MAAA SHAKTI DE!

But the heart of the story takes place in between when he said "he who is without sin..." and "...go and sin no more".

After everyone left, he said, "Is there no one left to condemn you?"
She said, "No one."
Then he said, "Then neither do I condemn you."

My biggest problem with your position is the lack of compassion. You bothered to remind people that women are people too. But your disgust with prostitutes and their clients has blinded you to the fact that they are people too.

Be still, my heart!