Red flags on a woman.

Post Reply New Topic

vilin66 has been warned about his attitude towards the female gender, so far its the only thing we can do(alex should really rewrite the rules in a way that we could act differently towards certain members.)

If Alex and Autism Speaks were more ethical he would be gone....

Shame shame shame

(I understand you mods are just doing your job description)

Somewhat tangential to topic at hand, but might it be possible to install an "ignore" button?

I don't hate women, I hate the system, and how it's rigged.

just because you have a lack of success does not mean the system itself is rigged.

I'm not the only one. There are millions of men all across the western world society. The dating game IS rigged against men. I've proven that already, so many times.

Good answer.

actually, you haven't proven anything at all. the only thing you have done is make outlandish claims. the points you have made say a lot about your own attitude but very little about the western world itself.

Alpha male deer die earlier than non alpha. They start fighting at the beginning of the rutting season, often lose much weight from dominating the female herd, fighting off other males, all the while expending more energy with no time to eat. A great deal of nervous energy is used too. Kind of a living hell..... but, they get to mate with them all.

Most of these alphas die prematurely from fighting

yeah the system is rigged

Nature wants destroy us, and nice guys can eat worms

There are inherent problems with the dating culture, I agree. But you're taking this way too extreme. Beyond extreme in fact. You've allowed yourself to become blinded by self-righteous anger and outward blaming (namely towards women).

Looking at it coldly and logically, the problems are there. For example, men do have to provide a lot more funds than women for the same desired outcome (assuming both parties want to date and eventually form a relationship). However, we also live in a society where women are judged and ranked romantically entirely by their appearance. Not only is this demeaning and stigmatizing, it also means that a woman's chance romantically of finding a mate is directly proportional to an external characteristic mainly outside of their control.

Obviously, in both cases this is propped up by mainstream media, and there are many exceptions to the rule in people who aren't completely brainwashed (I'm not talking from an all or nothing perspective here). I also believe that in every different era of human culture there are different gendered problems in social/dating culture. If you look back only a hundred years or so people did not have free choice in romance (arranged marriage); in many cases neither men or women were allowed to marry for love, so people were trapped in loveless marriages.

These above issues are mostly universal and have been part and parcel of life for millenia

The historical marriage alliance's between families or clans has died, with the alliance toward big brother or the state now taking precedence for increasing survival

If the state is not framed on your mantel piece, like a loving ancestor ..... your marriage may not survive nearly as well as if you conform or allowing oneself to be capture bonded to the state

The downside is that big brothers clan are a bunch of overweight, drugged, medicated, dumbed down morans who will drag you down with stupidity and inanity

Welcome to hell, heres your balls back on a plate, we want to see you eat them

What's unfair or 'rigged' about all this is that it is fair and hence the weaker will miss out. it's like the soccer teams that never get referee decisions going their way...

:P (runs and hides under flame-proof jacket)

It may be fair to point out that the single most common denominator in Vilin66's lack of success with women is not the women, but Vilin66 himself, judging by 28 out of the 30 posts he's made so far.

Does it seem like he is "projecting" or "mirroring"? I'm a little vague on the differences between the two behaviors.