#yesallwomen
I don't know what you've been reading, but a good chunk of the rhetoric I've been seeing about this is how more men were killed by this misogynistic psycho than woman, indicating that this kind of crap can be just as dangerous to men as women, therefore we men have all the motivation we need to stop misogyny in it's tracks wherever we see it. Hating women and hating the men able to get them go hand in hand.
Of course, let's not also forget that he fully planned on entering into a sorority house, yet failed to do so and had to improvise. You don't get much clearer than "I'm going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB and I will slaughter every single spoilt, stuck-up, blonde slut that I see inside there."
_________________
Someone call for the Dakta?
Yeah, I'm trying to decide whether that's a serious question or KK's playing for ironic bathos.
Uh no you misunderstand, I was laughing because I agree with him. You have some serious hangups about men, and I'm guessing with however old you are, it's probably a bit too late for therapy.
How's your imaginary girlfriend treating you?
you're right, he wasn't your run of the mill sexist asshat--but your average run of the mill sexist asshat (here in wrongplanet and elsewhere in the interwebs as well as the rest of the world) does sound eerily like much of what he said in his video. think about that for a moment.
Think about this for a moment - the bodies weren't even cold before people jumped on this bandwagon.
It doesn't seem to matter what nuances there are in any idlssue, this wave of feminism seems content with the exploitation of suffering and I cannot align myself with that. And no, this hashtag slacktivism is not helping. As a women, I don't like that I'm getting lumped in with this cospiratorial, paranoid fantasy, where patriarchy is some kind of organised crime syndicate controlling the minds of young impressionable men, as if they can't make their own damn decisions. For all this wave of feminism wants to point fingers and blame people, where's the blame for the actual criminal? By blaming
"dudebros", we're actually absolving him of any responsibility. I find that abhorrent and I will not associate with any form of feminism that thinks that is okay.
And, no, your run of the mill sexist asshat does not talk about murdering people! I mean, fine - discuss how problematic this whole "dudebro culture" is, but blaming these idiots for this tragedy in any way is guilt by association and its pathetic. Same f***ing tactic the MRM's. I thought feminists were meant to be better than that.
who here is blaming "dudebros" for this shooting and not the shooter himself? please link the post where i or anyone said other men are more responsible for this crime than elliot rodger is.
This is sort of a general response to a few people, but its also a response to starvingartist.
Well this entire hashtag campaign seeks to blame his entitlement and murderous rage on the echo chamber of PUA forums (which The Daily Kos erroneously link with the MRM). Maybe you didn't say it, but believe me, there are people that I have met that believe that his beliefs and mindset is a normal occurance in certain male spaces, which isn't true at all. This about creating a narrative where all men must assume responsibility for the comfort and percieved wellbeing of women. Its the same crap as schroedingers rapist - guilt by association, pure and simple.
There is no doubt that he was a mysogynist and that there are those who might share similar sentiments. However, this tragedy has been hiijacked and derailed to make a commentary about all mysogyny and to assert that all women are afraid that they will meet this same fate. It's the utter arrogance of saying that not only is this a tragedy for those two women (not seven) that were killed, but a tragedy for all women everywhere. Its disturbing how it echoes the same hysteria over gun control or drugs. Now I am not a fan of drugs or guns, but I'm especially not a fan of exploiting tragedy to further your agenda, especially when you act like somehow YOU'RE the victim.
Its a propaganda campaign that seeks to erase the seven men that died simply to confirm a bias and wants to make the issue about his misogyny, when clearly there was much more to his motivations. And while some others on this forum have mentioned looking at the intersecting aspects if hid psyche, all I am seeing is some very impressive mental gymnastics to support your confirmation bias. Seriously, some of you guys should try for the olympics.
Now I know you, starvingartist, don't think that he is absolved of his actions entirely, but why start this campaign in he first place if you didn't place at least a little blame on society?
Thank you MindBlind. You expressed my thoughts on this whole ordeal better than I ever could.
Yeah, I'm trying to decide whether that's a serious question or KK's playing for ironic bathos.
Uh no you misunderstand, I was laughing because I agree with him. You have some serious hangups about men, and I'm guessing with however old you are, it's probably a bit too late for therapy.
How's your imaginary girlfriend treating you?
i think the appropriate schoolyard response here would be "so you can dish it out but you can't take it, huh?" you threw the first punch, man.
Yeah, I'm trying to decide whether that's a serious question or KK's playing for ironic bathos.
Uh no you misunderstand, I was laughing because I agree with him. You have some serious hangups about men, and I'm guessing with however old you are, it's probably a bit too late for therapy.
How's your imaginary girlfriend treating you?
i think the appropriate schoolyard response here would be "so you can dish it out but you can't take it, huh?" you threw the first punch, man.
I posted that pic in jest. I admit it was a good burn and well deserved. Glass houses and all.
I think we do need a little levity here.
Let's stop squabbling, and go on with our lives.
I think it's pretty well agreed that the mods will moderate sexist remarks similar to how they moderate racist remarks.
Not all men are misogynist creeps.
Not all women are man-haters.
We're together for the long haul, like it or not.
I don't know what you've been reading, but a good chunk of the rhetoric I've been seeing about this is how more men were killed by this misogynistic psycho than woman, indicating that this kind of crap can be just as dangerous to men as women, therefore we men have all the motivation we need to stop misogyny in it's tracks wherever we see it. Hating women and hating the men able to get them go hand in hand.
Of course, let's not also forget that he fully planned on entering into a sorority house, yet failed to do so and had to improvise. You don't get much clearer than "I'm going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB and I will slaughter every single spoilt, stuck-up, blonde slut that I see inside there."
I've seen a lot of feminists project his views onto other people that are/were in his situation. They're plenty of socially awkward, depressed, lonely, and virgin guys that don't think about slaughtering women en masse. In fact I'm pretty sure 99.99999999999% of them don't think this way. Are we going to start viewing every christian the same as those nutjobs in the Westboro Baptist Church, or every Muslim the same as those in Al-Qaeda?
Let's stop squabbling, and go on with our lives.
I think it's pretty well agreed that the mods will moderate sexist remarks similar to how they moderate racist remarks.
Not all men are misogynist creeps.
Not all women are man-haters.
We're together for the long haul, like it or not.
Well, most of this is agreed, except the part about mods moderating sexist remarks similar to how they moderate racist remarks. While some of us might agree it's necessary, it's still up to Alex, who hasn't agreed to anything yet as far as I'm aware.
_________________
"There are things known, and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception."
--Aldous Huxley
Perhaps more vigilant (I can't really say if they are in fact more vigilant--despite being a member since 2008 I've only actually spent 3 or 4 months on the site), but not quite equal. If a thread were racist (as an example) or some other type of 'ist' covered by the TOS it would be completely removed from the site rather than just being left to fester, or rather than just being locked when people start getting nasty toward each other.
_________________
"There are things known, and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception."
--Aldous Huxley
If they're projecting that kind of stuff onto people that are simply having romantic difficulties, then they're being stupid.
If they're doing such to men that are regularly spouting all kinds of misogynistic BS? Sure, most of them would probably not go as far as a shooting spree, but I'm willing to bet they WOULD be perfectly willing to do lesser (but still terrible) things to women.
_________________
Someone call for the Dakta?
Kaufmancab51
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: 2 Sep 2008
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 180
Location: Rochester, New York
Had to read up on a few things before i could tie this to the latest feminist blasts that were waging over social media...
This is not a case of someone with just mental issues (as it's seemed to be covered in the news), but more of someone who couldn't get his way by not trying at all and expecting things to come.
I still can't figure out why more women are coming out about rape and whatnot after rejecting someone, though...
_________________
"Why do we fall? So that we can learn to pick ourselves up."
If guys were as willing to call out other men on sexism, rather than looking the other way or deciding it wasn't important, or that women should just deal, I think we'd see much less of it.
Yes, they must, but I hope they don't be labeled as chauvinist chivalrous knights for protecting women from bad men because some might confuse it with benevolent chauvinism. People should protect the vulnerable ones whether are women, men or kids.
Best quotes of the thread. Pretty much sums up my outlook.
We would see much less of it on either side, in fact. If the men's rights movement was actually about standing up to sexism (rather than a refuge for blatant sexists to spout hate and harassment), i'd be all for it. Men need advocates to, just not at the expense of women and vice-versa.
This is not a case of someone with just mental issues (as it's seemed to be covered in the news), but more of someone who couldn't get his way by not trying at all and expecting things to come.
I still can't figure out why more women are coming out about rape and whatnot after rejecting someone, though...
can you explain what you mean by this?
yamato_rena
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: 21 May 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 176
Location: United States
This story's upsetting to me. I've been debating for a while whether to try to put the effort in to desensitize myself to being touched by other people. I have a much, much harder time with touching guys than girls by default (girls I'm OK with if I'm the one initiating; guys I can't tolerate even then). I think that it's probably hypersensitivity exacerbated by mild phobia, and this story just reinforces the phobia. *headdesk*