Why are women so desperate for men?

Post Reply New Topic

First, take the name of the character voiced by John Candy in the animated film "the Rescuers Down Under".

Then complete this sentence: "use the ____, Luke!".

Apply the second to the end of the first.

It just occurred to me that there is a subtle and significant difference between
Why are women so desperate for men?
and
Why are women so desperate for me?

Because the women of the world don't respond to you anymore; you pushed them all away!

Ha! I remember her. Last thing I recall seeing her post was how men's value starts and ends with their dicks. Wasn't sure if I was supposed to find that arousing or insulting.

That literally means that the longer it is, the more you are valuable.

Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 16 Aug 2017, 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Oh, I'd forgotten about her. But I really liked k[redacted]. I honestly felt bad for her. She needed help. But that's no excuse for bullying autistic men. I have no idea if she was wilma[redacted]rce. A lot of the rhetoric was there, but I've heard the echo chamber so much it's really difficult to distinguish between one's individual persona and whatever talking points have been handed down from on high.

The short story is she had this idea that merely expressing our frustrations about women was by itself sexist and in violation of TOS. She went on this crusade to report every single miniscule speck of negativity and was just overall horrible to guys. I managed to get on her good side, but for all I know she was reporting me along with everyone else.

I've gotten in very little trouble in L&D. It was PPR that gave me such a hard time. For the longest time things were ok, even with some of the tougher characters. But once I started getting reprimands over nothing, it was time to close the door. And I started reporting stuff, and calling out feminists on personal attacks. They eventually just vanished into the ether. Since the rules of engagement changed in PPR, it holds no interest for me.

Naming banned members is against TOS. Well, TALKING about them is against TOS. That's why we can't tell you that where talking about [redacted] and [redacted]. I do wish mods would, say, post a list of banned members somewhere. As it is, it's kinda like the pregnant girl in private school. She just up and vanishes one day. And when you ask why she hasn't been to school in three weeks, people pretend they have no idea who you're talking about.

New guys...let me explain, it's not that complicated, I think that [redacted] is not [redacted] but [redacted] is actually [redacted], because if I remember right, [redacted] made the same references to [censored] about how [redacted] are [censored]. On the other hand, [redacted] has banned [redacted] but [redacted] didn't agree, so [redacted] said "[censored] you!" to [redacted] and a hell of a [censored] fight occurred.

Yep, I mean, that basically sums it up. lol

Actually, I don't know if "katy" is the same person I'm talking about. I was referring to a certain undernourished creative. See this thread from the grownup section:

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=263252&p=6245692#p6245692

They all come back.

If it isnkaty and Katy is who I think, then she is a nt who broke up with her aspie bf and blames all aspie men and men for his faults.

I don't message women who say their independent. I'm like so why are you on a dating site , is it the title they want? Mean if they don't want to ever spend hardly any time with a bf why look? I also believe everyone needs people, you can't be good at everything. No harm in letting others help. Am I weak for admitting there's areas I'd let a woman help me with. I suck at socializing, fashion, craft, music, some cooking, writing etc. I think people in relationships help each other in their weak areas. A true companion ship where they have each other's backs. I'm definitely more dependent though. I wouldn't like not seeing or talking to my gf for more then a day or two. Maybe independent is a bad way to define oneself cause it usually means level of contact one wants with a so. Independent being very little once a month less, and codependent being all the time. I just would like to see her every night or least get a few texts a day about how she's doing and saying love you etc. perhaps strong woman is better or equal.
I don't think hurtloam needs a guy to say fix her apartment, but I imagine it'd be nice , it'd go twice as fast. Two is better then one.
I don't think it's weakness to say you need or want a partner or that there's areas where a partner is better able to do. I'd probably rely on my partner for bunch of things I hoped I'd be replied on by her for things too.

You know what. I don't actually describe myself as 'independent' in general converse. It's just what others have said to me as a suggestion of why men aren't interested in me.

As you all know I'm often a depressed mess that eats lots of chips, binge watches Netflix shows and doesn't leave the house at the weekend when I'm really feeling down and worthless.

That's apparently not good either.

I dunno what to be. I'm just not appealing either way.

And I agree with a lot of what sly says. A partnership is my ideal, looking out for each other and spending time together. Just because I can sort of look after myself and wire a plug now doesn't mean I wouldn't like to have someone in my life everyday.

It's funny how men think an accomplished woman can't have feelings or want company, hell women think that too and don't bother inviting me out because they assume I'm a weirdo who doesn't need people.

Independant women aren't emotionless robots.

I think we should fix up sly and hurtloam. What say you, WP people? What would it take to get these two in the same town together?

Money, which neither of us have. Flights are expensive.

Don't you meddle.