Why 'intelligent conversation' is taboo

Page 1 of 3 [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 7:19 pm

I've had a lot of time to think about this recently - especially since I have a friend or two that are analyzing themselves on this as well as picking me apart on it. Where I agree with them, I've noticed most people - intelligent or otherwise, if your out having a drink, conversation is going around, and you make a comment or observation that happens to be very observant, structural, could be absolutely on point with the topic but just hit an angle that was much more in depth than what was going around in the conversation, people don't just roll it off and, in fact, it can and does start problems.

What I've learned about my social skills and a rather absolute hole in my own social skills (one that I don't think I'll ever be able to patch in - the mental apparatus I need for it quite literally does not exist, its absent from my head and thus I have zilch to work with) is being able to have 'basic' or 'dummed down' conversation. No, I don't go into wild theory, I don't break the topic and start talking about engineering, constellations, rather I listen to the conversation, say something directly on the topic, and I realize that I put a chill on the conversation. A great example of the specific kind of thing I'm talking about - a friend and I went to see a movie. When we got out we went to a restaurant, sat at the bar and ordered our food since it was kind of late and we didn't feel like taking a booth. They had menu black boards with some really good chalk art, we were chatting up the bar tender and she mentioned that a guy comes in to do work on this. I was looking at the specific drawing we were talking about (a fish) and admiring it because I knew that I'd never in the past been able to draw something like that - then it dawned on me that the artist had a base color in which he drew the entire fish and detailed in from there with lighter colors. I mentioned that (in 5th grade English - but it doesn't matter then again - its the concept itself that's the problem, big words would have just put it over the top), when I said that - it put a chill on the conversation. My biggest mistake is - I feel like being sociable, like what I'd assume other people are doing in sharing what they're passionate about in the immediate moment, what I'd think would be a good display of social skills - simply isn't.

I would also add that I understand, looking back, why I don't do basic conversation - when I was younger I tried to be the joker and, just by different wiring, I made absolutely no sense to anyone. I ended up being literally the most unpopular guy because no one could relate to me. I had to cut out a bad habit just to find out that cutting it out still left me with a void where I needed something better. Yes, I can joke with friends but the problem is - its Chapelle type humor, ie. too concrete/dry.

On what I think this means though - when I've watched this happen to me, when I've watched this happen to other people, this is what I think is going on: NT's in general have come up with an unspoken agreement that you are *not* supposed to say much of anything serious, much of anything too observant or too intelligent, simply because its been agreed upon that this is 'flouting' behavior (ie. being a braggard or being belittling without specifically saying the words). Even when you're out with intelligent people, if its a mixed crowd, the intelligent people will even start giving you a bit of a cold shoulder because they'll realize that you just aren't getting it - ie. they could do exactly what you are but they aren't, because they have class or understanding of others, and they have to assume that you don't.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think the picture is always this harsh - if your around strictly intelligent people and the conversation is desired (ie. everyone's sober - not at a bar), its ok, otherwise though, you really have to watch the rules of the situation).

For me though, even knowing those rules and even though I've had strong inklings throughout my twenties that this is exactly how it works - I simply haven't had a replacement plan. I really would like to figure out how to do conversation that is strictly social and basic but the challenge is, as I mentioned before - its not natural, I would have to intellectually 'get it', that probably sounds absurd, weak, etc. but - this is just the kind of challenge that I'm stuck with in my own neurology whether I like it or not. I realize that if I can't learn this - I will have to keep my mouth shut more often than not and yes, I will cause a social disturbance by doing that, or I will will be saying things that offend simply by actually cutting loose and enjoying a conversation (in some situations thats fine but in most - my way is the wrong way).

So I'd really like to direct this thread toward how to have 'basic' conversation, for people who've maybe had the same struggles and found a way around them? I will say right now - I wouldn't doubt that there are people reading this itching to come down on me for not just citing these people's 'inferiority' and throwing them aside; I'll say it right now - I think that's both a highly incorrect and highly destructive assumption, to yourselves and those around you, if you don't care about your life's outcome or adjusting to meet others half way that's your business - I'd rather keep this thread to people who are interested in making the most of things and really trying to understand the world around them).



roadGames
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 401

03 May 2010, 7:34 pm

Whenever I read your posts, it seems like something I'll be thinking 5-10 years from now. This is the one big aspect of NT behavior I am poor at.



Lene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,452
Location: East China Sea

03 May 2010, 7:46 pm

I think intelligent conversation has its time and place. If you're out for a drink with friends, people are probably just looking to relax and talk about easy subjects, not get into an in-depth examination of life, the universe etc.

Also, the purpose of social drinks seems to be to get along with all the people in the group so everyone has a good time. If you stick to safe topics, there is minimum risk of the conversation going above peoples' heads, or offending someone with different views to your own.

I used to belong to a hiking group. The motto of walking was 'always let the slowest walker set the pace', so that nobody got left behind. I think group conversation is the same; 'deep' conversation is all very well, but some people may feel left out if it is not their area of expertise. Nearly everybody is capeable of superficial chit chat.



Max_Headroom
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2

03 May 2010, 8:00 pm

Very rarely will you find people willing to discuss these things with you, and here's why.

People live in their own little bubbles; they subconsciously tend to avoid things that challenge their established beliefs - that, so to speak, threaten to pop this bubble, which would cause them pain. As a result of this, many people retreat from "Book learning", or actively surround themselves with information sources that agree with them, essentially making a safe little nest for themselves - and then you come along, and stand out like a sore thumb. Understanding that ordinary people see intelligent discussion as a challenge to their ideas can help you shape your conversational approach.

Similarly, people may become quiet or uncomfortable around you when you start talking "intelligently" because they feel inferior, maybe even a bit resentful/envious, and most certainly like they are being judged by you as something lesser. Be aware that normal people are squishy beneath the surface, and you may find new meaning in conversational discourse with them as a study in human attitudes.

I find the best approach to engaging ordinary folks is to ease them into the topic with friendly, noncontroversial topics. Having a good sense of humor is extremely useful in this regard, it being something that can break down the most complex topic to something the average Joe can comprehend in a non-threatening format.

Be patient, be polite, be aware of when you're pushing into uncomfortable territory, and you'll find that most ordinary folks have very intelligent things to say about certain topics - they're just afraid to say them.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 8:03 pm

Lene wrote:
I think intelligent conversation has its time and place. If you're out for a drink with friends, people are probably just looking to relax and talk about easy subjects, not get into an in-depth examination of life, the universe etc.

Also, the purpose of social drinks seems to be to get along with all the people in the group so everyone has a good time. If you stick to safe topics, there is minimum risk of the conversation going above peoples' heads, or offending someone with different views to your own.

I used to belong to a hiking group. The motto of walking was 'always let the slowest walker set the pace', so that nobody got left behind. I think group conversation is the same; 'deep' conversation is all very well, but some people may feel left out if it is not their area of expertise. Nearly everybody is capeable of superficial chit chat.


Here's something else, when I think about it more accurately - its not just intelligent conversation that's frowned upon but objective conversation as a whole, intelligent conversation is just one of the more visibly irritating angles of objective conversation. It seems like any kind of objective conversation though sinks the boat - especially if its all that trails from ones mouth with dry/observant humor.

So I have to ask you then, it sounds like you have an intuitive grip on this. For someone who can't generate superficial chit chat to save their lives, do you have any recommendations or explanation of how you understand it and what works/what doesn't?



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 8:07 pm

Max_Headroom wrote:
Very rarely will you find people willing to discuss these things with you, and here's why.

People live in their own little bubbles; they subconsciously tend to avoid things that challenge their established beliefs - that, so to speak, threaten to pop this bubble, which would cause them pain. As a result of this, many people retreat from "Book learning", or actively surround themselves with information sources that agree with them, essentially making a safe little nest for themselves - and then you come along, and stand out like a sore thumb. Understanding that ordinary people see intelligent discussion as a challenge to their ideas can help you shape your conversational approach.

Similarly, people may become quiet or uncomfortable around you when you start talking "intelligently" because they feel inferior, maybe even a bit resentful/envious, and most certainly like they are being judged by you as something lesser. Be aware that normal people are squishy beneath the surface, and you may find new meaning in conversational discourse with them as a study in human attitudes.

I find the best approach to engaging ordinary folks is to ease them into the topic with friendly, noncontroversial topics. Having a good sense of humor is extremely useful in this regard, it being something that can break down the most complex topic to something the average Joe can comprehend in a non-threatening format.

Be patient, be polite, be aware of when you're pushing into uncomfortable territory, and you'll find that most ordinary folks have very intelligent things to say about certain topics - they're just afraid to say them.


Thank you - great answer!

Max_Headroom wrote:
Similarly, people may become quiet or uncomfortable around you when you start talking "intelligently" because they feel inferior, maybe even a bit resentful/envious, and most certainly like they are being judged by you as something lesser. Be aware that normal people are squishy beneath the surface, and you may find new meaning in conversational discourse with them as a study in human attitudes.

I'm sure that's exactly what's going on. The sad part, for me, when I'm in social situations though - I feel like I'm stuggling to stay above water, and, you have to speak to maintain your right to be in that conversation or at least do a good enough job of playing off your lack thereof one way or another. Typically I end up getting myself in trouble attempting to do just the opposite - ie. proof of value, but as I said earlier and in complete agreement with what your saying I see exactly where that blows up in my face.

Max_Headroom wrote:
Be patient, be polite, be aware of when you're pushing into uncomfortable territory, and you'll find that most ordinary folks have very intelligent things to say about certain topics - they're just afraid to say them.

For now though I have to be very careful on that. Seeing that from people and assuming their intelligence is high, perhaps higher than it is or higher than they're secure with following, is exactly what gets me in trouble. I should perhaps just keep to their sound bites in this regard and then go back to basics (if I can figure out how) rather than getting swept or over-empassioned by their observations.

What sucks as well though, I realize its been a safety game for me as well - ie. if I didn't show something in the past I got bullied or had people quite literally jam their bubbles down over me and obliterate my identity (instinctively people have not treated me well). I'd like to think I'm wise enough at this point to find other ways of solving that problem than continuing to try and defend myself with a whole other problem such as this.



JazzofLife
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 8 Apr 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 343
Location: Southeast TN USA

03 May 2010, 8:17 pm

That's easy.

The average citizen of the USA reads a newspaper that is printed at a fifth grade level (The New York Times is printed at a 12th grade level).

TV programs are "dumbed down," all in the name of ever increasing violence. Who needs intelligence, when violence feels more comfortable supposedly with many people. Cartoons have become more violent over time. The days of "Peanuts," "Tom and Jerry," and other cartoons from old give way to ones like "Beavis and Butthead," "South Park," and others.

The news media loves to broadcast and print negative news, because it is a "cash cow" to them. More negative news = feeling more negative about one's self and in the environment around that person. Very rarely are stories with a positive spin mentioned on the news, the internet, or in hard copied periodicals. Positive stories don't sell as well as negative stories. Since when has a soap opera had a dominate positive theme to it? Never.. most everything has a negative tone to it.


_________________
Scott
"The Jazz of Life - the only way to live life"

Dx'd with AS and AD/HD Combined in 2007

Interests: Music, great outdoors (beach/mountains), cooking/baking, philosophy, arts/sciences, reading, writing, sports, spirituality, Green, sus


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 8:23 pm

Something else to throw out there - off of something Max brought up and something I realize that I'm doing as a coping mechanism after writing that last post which is this:

I started showcasing my intelligence so other people couldn't, effectively, drag me into their bubble and rape me. that meant that I literally had to jam their bubble as it came at me, deflect it, and do the game of wills to let them know it wasn't happening (though it really depended where I was in the day and how much mental energy I had left). I have a certain kind of look about me that's conducive to people trying - a lot - when they get any impression that I might be as soft, kindly, dumb, or emotionally weak as I apparently seem to look to them on first glance. The problem is, regardless of how much I'd think that I trust myself not to do the same thing to others - I may be giving them the exact same feeling that I'm trying to keep them from putting me through, whether, even if I'm giving them that to a significantly lesser degree - they're not used to it or knowing how to deal with the emotions that come with that, I on the other hand was just that genetically lucky to be singled out a bit more often.

That's a whole other dynamic that I have to consider in this - ie. I will need to add a layer of interpretation or digestion to what I'd already say rather than just trying to shut it down as the hole left in the wake of that would be dangerous.



Last edited by techstepgenr8tion on 03 May 2010, 8:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Max_Headroom
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2

03 May 2010, 8:29 pm

Glad to have been a help.

Quote:
I'm sure that's exactly what's going on. The sad part, for me, when I'm in social situations though - I feel like I'm stuggling to stay above water, and, you have to speak to maintain your right to be in that conversation or at least do a good enough job of playing off your lack thereof one way or another. Typically I end up getting myself in trouble attempting to do just the opposite - ie. proof of value, but as I said earlier and in complete agreement with what your saying I see exactly where that blows up in my face.


I can understand how you might feel that way, but it's not necessarily true - others won't judge you if you're quiet, observant, and comment only when you feel you have something relevant to say. It's not how much you say, it's what you say, and the weight that it carries that matters - as you've already found with your chalkboard situation.

Being warm, friendly, and cordial will make people value your presence, spoken or not, in a conversation - after all, "He who speaks least, knows most" - Or perhaps better, "Better to be silent, and be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth, and be known one"? Ha!

Quote:
For now though I have to be very careful on that. Seeing that from people and assuming their intelligence is high, perhaps higher than it is or higher than they're secure with following, is exactly what gets me in trouble. I should perhaps just keep to their sound bites in this regard and then go back to basics (if I can figure out how) rather than getting swept and enpassioned by their observations.


Having worked in retail for a while, I can tell you with a degree of certainty that assuming normal people have above average intelligence is a prescription for depression and disappointment with the state of humanity (at least in my experience - your mileage may vary).

Going back to my bubble analogy; most people don't actively seek out information because it threatens to conflict with their established ideas. They won't share these ideas unless they feel safe opening up - that's not something that's going to come up in the typical day-to-day conversation unless you have a certain talent for it (People open up to me all the time, it's not as great as it sounds) so don't set your expectations too high. One foot before the other!



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 8:44 pm

Max_Headroom wrote:
Going back to my bubble analogy; most people don't actively seek out information because it threatens to conflict with their established ideas. They won't share these ideas unless they feel safe opening up - that's not something that's going to come up in the typical day-to-day conversation unless you have a certain talent for it (People open up to me all the time, it's not as great as it sounds) so don't set your expectations too high. One foot before the other!

Since I'm a visual thinker it would likely be good for me - until I grasp this on more of an intuitive level - to think of it as if everyone had auras or orbs of information/data traveling around them, that all the orbs are very different, varying in color, intensity, the types of information, and that I really have to deal with that sheild or orb, much in the same way as a firewall, before I can connect with them effectively. Wow, that sounds way more aspie than what I thought I had in me but, I think that might be the most accurate depiction I can think of.

At the same time though yeah, I don't want to be a rant and rave post. When I have noticed people who I literally can't talk to I will shut down, sometimes they take that has having a great unconditional listener (which I'll admit - I do my best on listening but there are times where I may be better off doing things to give them the cue that I want no part of it).



MrDiamondMind
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 371
Location: Encapsulated within a skull; covered in sheets of skin

03 May 2010, 8:48 pm

I hate seeing supposedly smart people on a leash. :o
Also, though I can see how this can relate to Love and Dating, you have made absolutely no attempt to drive your topic in that direction.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 9:08 pm

MrDiamondMind wrote:
Also, though I can see how this can relate to Love and Dating, you have made absolutely no attempt to drive your topic in that direction.

I can actually sum that one up rather quickly - if you do this with women its a great way to keep yourself single almost indefinitely. Friends will be a lot more accepting, they may perhaps be endeared so long as you're blatantly rude or cocky with it out in public (so far so good with that from my end), however in the relationship world if a guy does this - its weakness, he's not being lymbic enough to be a real man or to be the killer-male (thank you Warren Farrell) who can be the bread winner, where a lot of even very attractive women as I understand it will be single for a very long time, even indefinitely, if they act like brainiacs rather than at least sportingly playing the part of sex object.

The guy's supposed to grunt, eat raw meat, and beat up other guys. The girl is supposed to look good and be erotic to men which usually involves acting ditsy, child-like, etc.. Don't get me wrong - I HATE these roles, just that if you don't fulfill them or at least know how to pretend like you are (or think you're too avant garde for that kind of primeval way of thinking), society teaches people rather quickly that they'll be exactly where they were promised to land up for lack of conformity - ie. in their own desert. It seems like, since we're not a society that practices physical violence and tests anymore its gone more to mentalism - and consistently making intelligent or objective conversation is a failure in one's own animalism thus a failure in alphahood for either sex; unless they know that they need to turn it on and off, when, and how.



DemonAbyss10
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,492
Location: The Poconos, Pennsylvania

03 May 2010, 9:32 pm

THis doesnt just wind up being an annoyance to others in relationships, it can also piss off people in day to day life, so really it would be a better fit for the social skills forum than just simply love and dating, hence why I will give an example of why it doesnt apply to only love and dating.


I tend to make observational/logically constructed comments all the time, and to alot of people, they tend to be very pessimistic comments. And god forbid if one of them is an extreme optimist, it will then escalate into a flame war, but with real spoken speech. A good example ive had would be the following, which is a real conversation that has happened. I got a door to door person asking for donations for a cause once and it went like this. And Yes, its a damn group ran by an evangelical church so I was gonna be blunt to begin with.

Quote:
Person bugging for donations to help africa (PBDHA for short): Would you like to donate money to help those in need in Africa?

Me: Its a shame that life is that way over there but I can't.

PBDHA: Why not?

Me: How can we be expected to fix the problems of everywhere else in the world when we still cant fix our own problems at home?

PBDHA: We all live on the earth, their problems are ours too..

Me: Why should we pay attention to the starving people ion africa when we have our own over here? We have our own homeless and whatnot, our own unemployed who have lost everything, and sufferers from disaster in our own local area and country.

PBDHA: They are people too.

Me: THey brought on the problems over there mostly on their own. They cant stop ******* warring, which ruins the land, and prevents them from going further ahead with farming and other projects which can benefit the people, and they cant realize the fact that reproducing like rabbits is just making their problem worse. People have brought the problems up before and tried to educate them, but it hasnt really worked. Granted some of the problems are environmental, but still, they way they are living over there is also exacerbating their problems.

PBDHA: Well this is gods world and we have to do something. And he says there is plenty of room for even more people. It would be a good thing if they just have food to get by.

Me: Sorry to tell ya, but just getting them food wont fix anything, by giving them donations they are gonna become over-reliant on them, and then what will happen? We are in a financial crisis, your donations wont last forever. When the last of the donations have dried up its just gonna get worse.

PBDHA: God will provide

Me: Whats he gonna do? Is food just gonna appear out of thin air?

PBDHA: If needed it will

Me: Sorry to burst your bubble but the world isnt all sparkly and filled with pink unicorns. The weak get culled, and its a cruel fact of life, survival of the fittest and all that. Food cant just appear, they need to learn how to farm and abstain from expanding their population.

(this is where the conversation ends up becoming less civil)

PBDHA: You must always keep faith in god my friend. If you have faith anything is possible.

Me: If that were true humanity would have ceased to exist already.

PBDHA: You don't believe do you?

Me: Who says I don't believe or if I do. For all you know he can both exist and not exist at the same time. I believe in the possibility, but I need more proof.

PBDHA: Your going to hell for not fully acceping jesus christ as your lord and savior, you know that dont ya.

Me: I wouldnt mind hell, cause you know why, the torture and s**t would take a bit to get used to, but eventually id just come to accept it, because you know, you get used to that s**t after a while.

PBDHA: I pity your soul more than you realize, luckily for you I have come bearing gods gift that can lead to your salvation which will then let you into heaven. *hold out a bible*

Me: Sorry, but I dont really care for kneeling at someones feet and worshipping them for all eternity.

PBDHA: Well then, may you suffer in hell.

Me: You wanna know why I dont care for your message of deliverance? Its groups like yours trying to make everyone believe in the same damn thing that are a cause of conflict in this world, no, its not the religion itself but the followers that claim to be fighting for the cause they believe their god is for. Take a look at the crusaders for instance.

PBDHA: They are what we strive the be, holy warriors spreading the message.

Me: So you want to be a bunch of people using religion as an excuse to plunder the lands and nonbelievers and then rape and massacre them in the process while oppressing the rest?

PBDHA: **** You

Me: You know I speak the truth

PBDHA: **** You you ******* satanist.

Me: And now I want you out of here.

PBDHA: The rapture is comming and you will pay the price for not believing. (turns to leave)

Me: May you be blessed by his noodly appendage *I thin close the door*


_________________
Myers Brigg - ISTP
Socionics - ISTx
Enneagram - 6w5

Yes, I do have a DeviantArt, it is at.... http://demonabyss10.deviantart.com/


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 9:39 pm

Yeah, that seems like way too much work. I would have just said "I'm strapped for cash right now. Is there a way that I can contribute online?" - taken the literature in and pitched it in the trash. Its the same for the timeshare people "Really? Ok. So where can I find out more about this? Sounds great. What's your name? Your phone number? Great - I'll research it this afternoon and call you back" - which, of course, I do none of the above.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

03 May 2010, 9:56 pm

I think it depends on the group of people. If you're around people of mixed intelligence, some of them will just not know how to engage the conversation, so some of this subset will feel put off, and others might just quietly enjoy it. A lot of people consider too much thinking to be work, so if they're at a bar, they'd rather relax and avoid such topics; these people might become annoyed and feel you're trying to show off. Intellectually competitive people might feel the urge to show they know more than you.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,530
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 May 2010, 10:06 pm

NeantHumain wrote:
I think it depends on the group of people. If you're around people of mixed intelligence, some of them will just not know how to engage the conversation, so some of this subset will feel put off, and others might just quietly enjoy it. A lot of people consider too much thinking to be work, so if they're at a bar, they'd rather relax and avoid such topics; these people might become annoyed and feel you're trying to show off. Intellectually competitive people might feel the urge to show they know more than you.

Yeah, that's the striation.

My biggest challenge with many things like this is looking at myself, looking at who I am, looking at what I need to communicate in order for people to see me accurately (wherever possible) through whatever colored glasses they have on - finding my place in this and a place that works will be a tall order, but, I've gotta do it if I want to have more control of my domain and fewer surprises (I tried cynicism for a time but I found it way too expensive on my happiness and overall health - both of those lead into exactly the kind of future one would predict as well).