New Category

Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ]

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

23 Jan 2011, 4:29 am

I've noticed several men on this forum aren't interested in sex but would like a relationship with a girl nonetheless. Is this still classed as wanting a sexual relationship or having a sexual interest in girls, or should we find a different name, such as "Romantic interest"? To me it seems silly to class it as sexual when sex isn't really a priority for them.

Kaybee
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Oct 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,446
Location: A hidden forest

23 Jan 2011, 5:35 am

I believe that is considered asexuality. I'm no expert on the subject, though. I'm sure someone else can enlighten us.

_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."

Last edited by Kaybee on 23 Jan 2011, 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

23 Jan 2011, 6:39 am

I'm not overall interested in sex, but I'm also not asexual. If it happens, it happens. But the important thing for me is to find the relationship. I'd rather have a sexless yet meaningful relationship than casual, meaningless sex, but if a meaningful relationship that happens to involve sex comes around, so much the better (At least, as long as the woman isn't going to judge me for my lack of experience)...

hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

23 Jan 2011, 8:12 am

CrinklyCrustacean wrote:

To me it seems silly to class it as sexual when sex isn't really a priority for them.

Thats the same as saying "To me it's silly not to class it as ham when it's actually a hamster"
Basically, because the word "sex" is in asexual, it does not mean the word is inappropriate to describe in this case. I dunno, maybe I read it wrong.

JazzofLife
Deinonychus

Joined: 8 Apr 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 343
Location: Southeast TN USA

25 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm

CrinklyCrustacean wrote:

I think it would be asexual, as a few have mentioned on this thread. I'm AS, but I'm definintely not asexual. I could never be in an asexual relationship with a woman. I would go bonkers.

_________________
Scott
"The Jazz of Life - the only way to live life"

Dx'd with AS and AD/HD Combined in 2007

Interests: Music, great outdoors (beach/mountains), cooking/baking, philosophy, arts/sciences, reading, writing, sports, spirituality, Green, sus

Bloodheart
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,194
Location: Newcastle, England.

25 Jan 2011, 11:20 pm

Asexual is the term - little or no interest in sex or a sexual relationship.

Like so many other sexualities it can encompass a wide range of wants, some have zero interest in sex or any sort of romantic relationship and never find anyone attractive, some have little interest in sex - be it intercourseor all sex acts, some asexual people will be very sexual and just not want sex or not want a relationship, some are open to sex and some are not, some are attracted to same sex, opposite sex or both both go no further.

It's a little like bisexuality - it's not as black and/or white as 'no sex/no relationship' for all asexual people, it's still a sexuality whether there is actual sex involved or not - relationships for such people can still be sexual on some level, if nothing else it is a relationship of partnership between people of two sexes/two sexualities.

I used to consider myself asexual (sexual, attracted to both sexes, only didn't want sex), my ex boyfriend is asexual (relationship with women, but no sex), and my boyfriends best friend is asexual (no interest in anyone for anything, not even relationship).

_________________
Bloodheart

Good-looking girls break hearts, and goodhearted girls mend them.

Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ]

Jump to:

New Category Post Reply New Topic

New Category