How do you know what your "type" is?

Post Reply New Topic

Even I can figure out who I want to pursue, and they're not all that uncommon. But I need to know who I should pursue.

I suppose NTs just seem to know, or just learn by trial and error, who they are likely to connect with.

Maybe if I could figure this out I might actually get a second date some time...

I don't know if NTs have it any easier. There are tons of books devoted to this very subject for both men and women to sort out.

I figured it out from trial and error, from therapy and discussions with friends, from just being in touch with my own heart and desires. I know it takes more than one date with someone to know if they're an option. The question you should have at the end of the first date is if you'd like to spend more time with her. If the answer is "yes", then ask for a second date. Don't make any quick decisions too early on.

You might just not have a type really. I know a couple people who have very specific ideas about what they like in a partner, but I've dated several people and found that I don't really have a type. I have a 'type' on paper (what comes to mind when I think of what's attractive), but that isn't always what's necessarily the best for me.

If I find the person inexplicably attractive, they are my type.

It's taken a long time for me to figure out what my type is, and how I know when a guy is my type? He makes me feel comfortable and he makes me smile. It's a combination you can't find just by looking at a guy, so it takes me a bit more time to find someone who is my type than some other people I guess.

I don't really think there is such a thing as a particular type, for me at least. When you click with someone you just click. If you like her and she likes you, then you are each other's type, but I don't think it's something you can predict ahead of time.

I always see people making lists of what they would like in their ideal mate, but when you actually meet someone with whom you click, then all of that just goes right out the window. It could be someone who has none of the characteristics on your list.

I haven't the first clue what my "type" is but they'd better at least like Transformers :p

Grisha, my vague recollection of the research on long term, romantic relationships/ marriage, is that the more similar two people are to each other, the greater the chance of "success" / the lower the likelihood of relationship will end. I believe this is quite well established for basic characteristics such as age, religion, education level, etc. (Although, keep in mind that these are general trends. I'm sure there are individual cases of quite different people in long, happy marriages.) There is probably some research on shorter term relationships, such as getting a second date. You could try searching the literature:
http://scholar.google.com
http://oedb.org/library/features/best-o ... arch-sites

Some dating web sites try to utilise this principle by focusing on specific niches (e.g. http://www.sciconnect.com/ ). Other dating web sites claim to have developed special algorithms/ models for successfully matching people. The following article discusses three such companies:
"How Do I Love Thee?"
''A growing number of Internet dating sites are relying on academic researchers to develop a new science of attraction. A first hand report from the front lines of an unprecedented social experiment.''
By Lori Gottlieb
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc ... thee/4602/
(I recommend you take the "science", discussed in that article, with a grain of salt.)

The catch, of course, is that these web sites charge $£¥€s. Are they worth the cost? I don't know, I've never used them. (For a critique, see, "Why You Should Never Pay For Online Dating" < http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/why-y ... ne-dating/ >.)