Page 1 of 11 [ 168 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

07 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm

Thread split from elsewhere



Last edited by TallyMan on 10 Jan 2013, 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Boxman108
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,832
Location: NH

08 Jan 2013, 11:26 pm

...


_________________
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or
just walking dully along...


Last edited by Boxman108 on 10 Jan 2013, 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

08 Jan 2013, 11:31 pm

Boxman108 wrote:
Not this BS again. That comic is hardly accurate at all, at least to most here. There are people who don't act on infatuation alone like other shallow people out there and who have to wait for anything worthwhile to grow in a more genuine way. It's not fair to make them out to be as*holes.


Nah, Nice Guy™ is more about the mindset that friendship for its own sake with women is worthless, and that any man showing basic human decency deserves sex. Not about being shy. Also, what? More genuine?
It's a question of how entitled the man feels to another person (against that persons will), and how indignant he is when rejected. If you don't use any of those tactics, or feel that way, then you have nothing to be angry about. If you do, you are an as*hole and there's no need to "make them out to be" that.
I doubt that is something anyone would want to defend or be if they know the definition.

More info -> http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Nice_guy_syndrome
Actually that link has really good advice on how to NOT act when looking for a girlfriend, so it's a good read no matter what.

Also, I never claimed OP was that. I just said, don't be.

And don't do this -> http://www.doctornerdlove.com/2012/12/p ... nice-guys/



Boxman108
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,832
Location: NH

09 Jan 2013, 12:40 am

...


_________________
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or
just walking dully along...


Last edited by Boxman108 on 10 Jan 2013, 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

09 Jan 2013, 9:50 am

Boxman108 wrote:
You're making them out to be manipulators when that could not be farther from the truth. There's no need for this mindless nonsense to be spouted on these forums; it's only going to make it much harder for those who don't feel comfortable dating or going at as fast a pace as others. So please take it somewhere else.


Which "them"? If you're talking about Nice Guys™, then damn straight they're manipulators and don't need me making them out to be anything. I think you should please take it somewhere else with your needless defense of as*holes. You have not even engaged with the OP or talked about the actual situation of his lovelife, you just came in here to be rude towards me. Shame on you.

Also, if talking about Nice Guys™ will dissuade someone from trying to date - if someone doesn't feel comfortable because people dislike jackasses, then NO, they damn shouldn't date either until they've learned how to behave.



Boxman108
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,832
Location: NH

09 Jan 2013, 10:07 am

...


_________________
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or
just walking dully along...


Last edited by Boxman108 on 10 Jan 2013, 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

09 Jan 2013, 10:18 am

Boxman108 wrote:
Anomiel wrote:
Boxman108 wrote:
You're making them out to be manipulators when that could not be farther from the truth. There's no need for this mindless nonsense to be spouted on these forums; it's only going to make it much harder for those who don't feel comfortable dating or going at as fast a pace as others. So please take it somewhere else.


Which "them"? If you're talking about Nice Guys™, then damn straight they're manipulators and don't need me making them out to be anything. I think you should please take it somewhere else with your needless defense of as*holes. You have not even engaged with the OP or talked about the actual situation of his lovelife, you just came in here to be rude towards me. Shame on you.

Also, if talking about Nice Guys™ will dissuade someone from trying to date - if someone doesn't feel comfortable because people dislike jackasses, then NO, they damn shouldn't date either until they've learned how to behave.


I came into this thread to stop this BS from spreading. It does not need any encouragement whatsoever. Painting less aggressive males as manipulators is incredibly sexist, and will only enforce gender roles even more so. I'm hardly being rude; I'm trying to save those who don't fit the male stereotype from unnecessary pain, and that means I have to start from stamping it out here.


But the Nice Guy™ thing isn't about being "less aggressive", it is about being downright deceitful and not valuing friendship with women unless it leads to sex/a relationship. Aka the whiiiiining about "friendzones". Also about only keeping up a facade as "being nice" (and often they're not even that) for the purpose of their own selfish goals, not about actually being a nice sort of person. A nice sort of person would not EXPECT sex as payment for not being " a jerk". How can you defend that?
It's not sexist, and if it causes someone pain because people dislike being manipulated, then maybe they should work on themselves a bit.




Quote:
Look At It From Her Perspective

You hear from the Nice Guys on a regular basis about how b*****s ain’t s**t, but it’s not very often that attention is paid to the woman’s side of things. After all, it’s worth remembering that there are two people involved in this situation. More if you want to include everyone involved in posting memes in the Nice Guy rants on Reddit.

This is one of the things that I especially liked about the Tumblr post: the reminder that while the Nice Guy is busy getting back-pats for unleashing torrents of butthurt, there’s a young woman out there who’s feeling confused and hurt when she found out that someone she trusted, someone she thought she could confide in and rely on was wondering how long he was going to have to put up with this emotional s**t before she let him get to second base.

As horrible as the woman’s “betrayal” may be for the Nice Guy, it’s worse for the person he’d been lying to; she’s not the one who accepted the offer of friendship under false pretenses, whose honest response of “I don’t feel that way about you” is met with a torrent of abuse, in person and online. She allowed herself to trust him, to share secrets and fears, to make herself emotionally vulnerable only to find out that he’s just trying to collect fuck-points. Meanwhile he’s the one getting the sympathy and support while she’s reviled for being a dumb castrating b***h who deserves the misery she will surely get when she realizes how much of a prize she missed out on.

I get that rejection hurts; I’ve been rejected more times than I can count and I’ve got the wangsty emo LiveJournal posts to prove it. But the Nice Guy’s self-involvement denies the fact that someone else has been hurt in this self-inflicted drama – and she’s been cast as the villain through no fault of her own.

Side note: yes, there are people out there who are users and manipulators. The fact that as*holes exist does not change the fact that the Nice Guy is a sh***y person for trying to hold onto a friendship only so he could f**k someone. And I say this as someone who has been The Nice Guy several times.



Boxman108
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,832
Location: NH

09 Jan 2013, 10:43 am

...


_________________
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or
just walking dully along...


Last edited by Boxman108 on 10 Jan 2013, 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

09 Jan 2013, 10:49 am

Boxman108 wrote:
Anomiel wrote:
But the Nice Guy™ thing isn't about being "less aggressive", it is about being downright deceitful and not valuing friendship with women unless it leads to sex/a relationship. Aka the whiiiiining about "friendzones". Also about only keeping up a facade as "being nice" (and often they're not even that) for the purpose of their own selfish goals, not about actually being a nice sort of person. A nice sort of person would not EXPECT sex as payment for not being " a jerk". How can you defend that?
It's not sexist, and if it causes someone pain because people dislike being manipulated, then maybe they should work on themselves a bit.


You are only assuming all that is true, as are those articles. It is extremely sexist to support the idea that males who are more comfortable with friendship first are only ever after sex or have some evil ulterior motive. Just because some act on physical attraction alone does not mean it is right for those who need something more substantial to start a relationship with. These articles are supporting the idea that it is somehow not right to try to be any different than your stereotypical sex craved as*hole.


Wait, you're denying the existence of Nice Guys™ - people that act like that? That's so funny, as there is so much evidence to the contrary, and I've known many of them personally and there are lots of self-professed "former Nice Guys™". How did you read it as "all men"?
"These articles are supporting the idea" that you should not act like an as*hole. 'tis all.



Boxman108
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,832
Location: NH

09 Jan 2013, 11:05 am

...


_________________
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or
just walking dully along...


Last edited by Boxman108 on 10 Jan 2013, 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

09 Jan 2013, 12:21 pm

Boxman108 wrote:
Anomiel wrote:
Wait, you're denying the existence of Nice Guys™ - people that act like that? That's so funny, as there is so much evidence to the contrary, and I've known many of them personally and there are lots of self-professed "former Nice Guys™". How did you read it as "all men"?
"These articles are supporting the idea" that you should not act like an as*hole. 'tis all.


This "Nice Guys" thing only exists because of the fact that males are expected to ask others out based only on shallow values and immediately, which does not work for everyone. That is what is sexist about it. Not all males work that way, and just because some prefer to be friends first does not make them manipulators. I think that the former sounds a lot more like something an as*hole would do. I know that I would be creeped out by anyone who would want to date me within only five minutes of knowing them.


This is not about those that do not develop feelings until they know someone - this is about the exact same creepy "wanting to date within 5 minutes" thing and then developing unrequited crushes on unavailable people but pretending to want to only be their friend. It happens, a lot. There is no way around it. Good for you if you're not creepy, then. Why are you continuing to say "all males"? It is about a specific behavior presented by a specific subset of the population and still you do all men a disservice by thinking it is about the non-creepy people too. If you fit the definition of a Nice Guy™, then you're creepy. If not, then don't defend them.



Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

10 Jan 2013, 6:00 am

Inferno87 wrote:
Pifff, dudes! Take it outside! :P


Yeah, sorry :)



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Jan 2013, 6:43 am

There are various sorts of guys that people put in the category mentioned. Some of them are fake, and others seem quite genuine but misguided. The thing they have in common is that they go out of their way to exhibit "niceness" and rely on it to attract girls.



Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

10 Jan 2013, 7:30 am

Boxman108, good idea with the split thread! There really is nothing to discuss about this. Anyone that are aware about Nice Guys™ thinks it's wrong, nothing to discuss there. Anyone that denies the existence of Nice Guys™ - nothing to discuss there either because it's not my job to convince you that some men do treat women badly. Only thing would be a general discussion of you know, learning acceptable behavior when wanting to get a girlfriend. Or people sharing their experiences of Nice Guys™ - but that is a bad idea, as this thread is not a safe place for that.



MCalavera wrote:
There are various sorts of guys that people put in the category mentioned. Some of them are fake, and others seem quite genuine but misguided. The thing they have in common is that they go out of their way to exhibit "niceness" and rely on it to attract girls.


Yes, that sort of behavior can be a result of genuine inexperience and not calculated. Still something they should change though... I'll copypaste what one of the links I shared earlier said about that.


http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Nice_guy_syndrome wrote:
Criticism

Feminists and others have criticised many aspects of Nice Guy Syndrome, mostly arguing that in some ways Nice Guys (often now called "Nice Guys™" with a trademark symbol to distinguish them from men who happen to be nice people) are not actually good friends or nice to their interest.

Criticism as a relationship strategy

There are some aspects of the Nice Guy™ pattern that may be due to inexperience:

• romantically and sexually fixating on one person ("oneitis") before they express any mutual interest in you is simply a relationship mistake to which many people are prone and may improve with time, experience or self-examination
• Nice Guys™ seem to regard a man's relationship with a woman as successful or valuable only if it is romantic or sexual in nature, i.e. friendship is failure
• Nice Guys™ may view a relationship with a woman as the only possible source of happiness in their lives

Feminist criticisms

Some aspects are due to the different socialisation of men and women:

• women are culturally trained to be gentle when rejecting men sexually, thus "you'd be a great boyfriend for someone else" and "you're like a brother to me" may be signals that the woman knows of the attraction and is trying to gently let the man down and encourage him to find other people he is attracted to, rather than callous obliviousness

Some aspects suggest that Nice Guys™ view women in essentialist or sexist ways:

• nice guys seem to expect, at some point, sexual "payment" for their kindness and generosity; that is, their niceness is self-interested
• the self-interest is deceitful: if the man does not reveal his attraction and expresses willingness to support his friend with her problems, that it makes sense for her to treat his friendship as genuine and take the offered support
• the implicit trade of "niceness" (emotional support) for sex is a sexist generalization that women want closeness and men want sex, so they can trade one for the other
• Nice Guys™ regard women as in some ways moral guardians: that women should choose the nicest men for sex in order to reward them for doing the right thing
• some men continue to think of themselves as "nice guys" even as they spend their time using misogynistic slurs to describe their alleged best friends and dear loves
• some "nice guys" consider themselves heroes for not raping women or hitting them (see Feminist cookie)
• some "nice guys" do not see themselves as guilty of sexual assault because they were very gentle with their non-consensual groping, and they equate sexual assault as only being violent and forceful

Some aspects suggest that Nice Guys™ view themselves in essentialist ways:

• the insistence on being close friends and mutually emotionally involved before expressing any romantic or sexual interest may involve some distrust of heterosexual men's sexuality as inherently dirty or predatory

A feminist position on relationships and seduction strategies

Underlying feminist criticisms is the position that no one is owed love or sex, not for being a nice person, not for being a feminist, not for any other reason.

Loneliness and unfulfilled desires are tragic and painful but feminists argue that consent is the only ethical relationship underpinning, and that requiring mutual consent for relationships and for sex will mean that some people do not get their romantic or sexual desires fulfilled at any given time.

Positive aspects

Some Nice Guy™ analysis recognises problems with the structure of heterosexual relationships, including:

• the expectation that the man must always be the initiator and aggressor.
• the expectation that men and women can't be emotionally intimate, only physically intimate.
• the reality that some men like and are suited to close emotional relationships that aren't considered masculine.

Some feminist men identify themselves as former Nice Guys™. This can be due to the Nice Guys™ increased awareness of other men's unfairness toward female sex partners. A limit to this process is that it doesn't always lead Nice Guys™ to a symmetric increase in self-awareness.



Vitamin-K
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Portland, Oregon

10 Jan 2013, 7:34 am

What is this thread about?



Boxman108
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,832
Location: NH

10 Jan 2013, 7:42 am

I was not even told that this would be split into another topic. Gee, thanks mods for f*****g s**t up again. Please take this down and ask for my permission next time you do anything with my posts.


_________________
About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or
just walking dully along...