Wolfheart wrote:
xMistrox wrote:
On a fundamental level it would be flawed due to biological wiring. There would have to be traits for both genders to seek in partners in order to select the right person to pass on their genes through (generally, stability/success in life). However, standard evolutionary traits of strength, size, and dominance have more or less been replaced with culutural traits of intellect, money, and posessions. Due to that, it would be possible to change the traits over time, but to remove them entirely would be difficult or impossible to do, even with a lot of oppression and conditioning.
Depends where you go, my type of woman is more impressed at how much you snatch over how fast you can do maths or how fast your car goes.
Again money and intellect isn't that important, now social status and social intelligence can attract certain ladies. I have known people to be on benefits and they can still attract multiple women at a time, that's because of the social charm they have. If women know you can attract other women or you have social approval, your attraction value instantly goes up, just like how some women are attracted to married men.
I don't think any woman cares how much you snatch except for possibly women who snatch themselves. And even then, maybe only like 20-30% of women who snatch care about their partner's ability to snatch at all.
Olympic lifters and powerlifters tend to also have pretty miserable boring loveless lives because we have no social life and just lift things up and put them down, and then go home and argue on forums, or maybe once you get serious enough to not argue on forums, just spend your spare time sleeping like 13 hours a day or something, for
all kinds of gains.
Let's see, I also don't think women care about deadlifts or squat numbers either. Or any lifting numbers.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohgYLLSK5G0[/youtube]
What real life is like for weightlifters. That's a good scenario, they're even rich enough to eat out after.