sixstring wrote:
What UDG said. There's no point in talking to others about it, if you haven't talked with him first.
There may be.
It's good to find information in a controversial area before trying to address it again. (
corkyviolet makes it clear that this wasn't a smooth-sailing convo)
Small talk is about
bonding, it is almost never about 'contributing'.
Contributing to what? Human knowledge? A personal-relationship-family-based biological database?
From a certain viewpoint one could argue that saying nothing (listening) is
not contributing... what now??
IF he is intelligent, then just maybe
some of his questions can not be satisfactorily answered "off the cuff". How is that your fault?
Tell him that if he's going to
ask tough questions,
then he can help answer them.
and second, if he doesn't discuss philosophy in the heat of sexual passion then maybe he's "not contributing" then either, hummm?
and thirdly tell him to
NEVER say "I love you" again. Don't be lazy, please say EXACTLY what you mean by that.
In full.
Each and every time.
And it better be good.
and lastly tell him to learn what communication is. It is at least 50% reception-interpretation,
is HE too lazy to try to figure out what you're trying to convey?
I'm annoyed with him already because he's acting irresponsibly to himself, the world, and to you.
and that is "Not Contributing" at all.
_________________
(14.01.b) cogito ergo sum confusus