wildcoyotedancer wrote:
Um you do realize this isn't scientific at all and even your questions are based on typical overly black and white and/or spurious Aspie pseudo logic right? I am an Aspie so I really try to analyze things from more than a if not a then must be b way of looking at things. We Aspies tend to ignore that there could be an infinite set of outcomes and not just the ones are brain interprets or can see or what we assume. Also there are so many published studies on men and women and dating, relationships that one can easily study and research this topic from all angles if that's a specialized area of interest. Of course most of the research is on NTs and in my experience us Aspies are pretty unique. I myself don't have the same view or attitude or way of being or processing in relationships as an NT woman or man and it has caused me misunderstandings and failed relationships and pain, some from not realizing that I was processing and interpreting and meaning things differently than NTs and some because for years I unconsciously tried to conform to societal norms and standards in romantic and sexual relationships.
You said it was a ridiculous and pointless poll because (1) it's not scientific and (2) because numerous studies have been done on the topic. Then, you say those studies are not relevant. So...I'm confused.
What I'm curious about is if, for men, having the interpersonal skills and competence necessary to hold down a full-time job is typically necessary but not sufficient for success in dating while, for women, this is not the case. One could interpret these results in a variety of different ways. It could mean discrimination against aspie men, like they have to overcome a higher barrier; it could mean employment and dating require completely different personal qualities; or it could be that aspie women face employment discrimination. Or it could be some combination.