Board index › Coping in life › Love and Dating

Dating Market Value Test for Men

Page 1 of 4 [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

28 Jul 2013, 2:26 am

Quote:
Here is a system for determining your dating market value if you are a man. Dating market value is a measurement of how you stack up against other men in the competition for attracting female interest.


http://heartiste.wordpress.com/dating-m ... t-for-men/

I scored 7.
Quote:
1 to 9:
Quote:
Classic beta. You catch some girls’ eyes, usually the ones you don’t want. Try not to make fatty f*****g a lifestyle.


Lol!! So true, except Asian and non-NT girls are the ones I want anyway. Still, it's accurate.

Here are the full possible results:

Quote:
-26: Why are you still alive?
-25 to -20: You’re an omega. Celibacy has its charms.
-19 to -15: You actively repulse girls. Your kind will usher forth the sexbot revolution.
-14 to -10: You’re always getted foisted onto the warpigs.
-9 to 0: Lesser beta. You don’t immediately disgust girls; they just don’t notice you. With much painful effort you can redeem yourself.
1 to 9: Classic beta. You catch some girls’ eyes, usually the ones you don’t want. Try not to make fatty f*****g a lifestyle.
10 to 14: A few attractive girls in the bar will be intrigued by your presence. But you need game to close the deal.
15 to 19: Congrats, you have crossed the alpha Rubicon. A lot of cute girls will be pleased when you hit on them. But you can still f**k up by being yourself.
20 to 25: You’re a natural. Many hot girls check you out and forgive your occasional pickup blunders. You always have a look of sexual satisfaction on your face.
26: Super Alpha. Booty sticks to you like bird s**t on car roofs.



Last edited by Tyri0n on 28 Jul 2013, 2:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

28 Jul 2013, 2:34 am

Tyri0n wrote:
Classic beta. You catch some girls’ eyes, usually the ones you don’t want. Try not to make fatty f***ing a lifestyle.


This truly sounds like a test result, based on scientific data that you can relie on.



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 2:36 am

:lol: Is this a wind-up ?
I mean seriously, I have never seen a more horsesh*tty test in my entire life.


ETA : Ah yes :-) editting in the results was a good move.
I can see now what a superlatively scientific and realistic test this actually is.



Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

28 Jul 2013, 2:37 am

Ladywoofwoof wrote:
:lol: Is this a wind-up ?
I mean seriously, I have never seen a more horsesh*tty test in my entire life.


It's actually pretty good because it subtracts points for fake PUA's, lack of respect for women's boundaries, and for MRA tendencies.

It's definitely one of the better ones out there imo.



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 2:43 am

8O You mean there are worse ones ?

:-) Really ! !??
I have honestly seen heaps of excrement which were less full of sh*t than this test.



Relicanth7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,896
Location: 'Murika... (Insert explicit word here) yeah!

28 Jul 2013, 2:43 am

-1... Lesser Beta...
Other then the fact that I can cause greater amounts of damage to tissues...
Image


_________________
~Aaron, the professional doormat.


Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

28 Jul 2013, 2:45 am

Ladywoofwoof wrote:
8O You mean there are worse ones ?

:-) Really ! !??
I have honestly seen heaps of excrement which were less full of sh*t than this test.


The fact that you're a woman and reacting so strongly against this test hints that it may be highly accurate.

If it were not accurate, you would not feel the need to get so defensive.

Sure, the guy is pretty sexist, and I disagree with him on a lot of things, at least from a values perspective. I would not follow all his advice because (1) I have autism & sensory processing disorders and dyspraxia, and I really can't and (2) I prefer sort of non-traditional women anyway. But his ideas of the way things work seem pretty dead-on.

Anyone who wants to date middle class cisgendered white women had better follow something approximating this guy's advice.



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 2:48 am

If you want to attract the kind of women who's a gold-digger and thinks it's hot when guys are arrested and get into violent fist fights, and expects guys to have masses of friends (but NOT online) , etc etc.... then I guess this could be helpful in gauging your attractiveness value.... but well ;-) yeah....



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 2:50 am

Tyri0n wrote:
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
8O You mean there are worse ones ?

:-) Really ! !??
I have honestly seen heaps of excrement which were less full of sh*t than this test.


The fact that you're a woman and reacting so strongly against this test hints that it may be highly accurate.

If it were not accurate, you would not feel the need to get so defensive.

Sure, the guy is pretty sexist, and I disagree with him on a lot of things, at least from a values perspective. I would not follow all his advice because (1) I have autism & sensory processing disorders and dyspraxia, and I really can't and (2) I prefer sort of non-traditional women anyway. But his ideas of the way things work seem pretty dead-on.

Anyone who wants to date middle class cisgendered white women had better follow something approximating this guy's advice.



No, I just think it's horsesh*t.
:lol: I'm surprised that anybody would take that sort of lads' mag nonsense seriously.

Again though, if you want to get with some kind of Barbie-type bimbo who likes aggressive criminals, then go for it though.
;-) There's no accounting for taste....



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 2:54 am

;-) Oh wow... there's an equally questionable one for testing the "Market value" of women :
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/dating-m ... for-women/



Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

28 Jul 2013, 2:57 am

Ladywoofwoof wrote:
If you want to attract the kind of women who's a gold-digger and thinks it's hot when guys are arrested and get into violent fist fights, and expects guys to have masses of friends (but NOT online) , etc etc.... then I guess this could be helpful in gauging your attractiveness value.... but well ;-) yeah....


Many neurotypical cisgendered white American women follow these stereotypes, however (in fact, a lot of women all over probably do). This sort of thing is about MAXIMIZING attractiveness to the most women, so you're right, it doesn't account for taste at all. It's the sort of thing you have to follow if you want to sleep with a lot of women, however, in order to maximize your attractiveness to the maximum number of women. If that is not your goal, then of course, it's pretty inapplicable.

Being arrested depends, though. It's hot for minor s**t, but for serious s**t, it can interfere with other aspects of attractiveness, so probably not.



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 3:00 am

;-) Go ahead... as they say, knock yourself out.

They're probably doing the other stupid test, and getting all worried because of lots of them having to take off a point for not taking it up the bum and orgasming just from the joys of the pleasure it gives their partner (as one question asks about) , or fretting about whether their forehead is the ideal height or their lips are not the right width, and crap like that.



Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

28 Jul 2013, 3:06 am

Ladywoofwoof wrote:
;-) Go ahead... as they say, knock yourself out.

They're probably doing the other stupid test, and getting all worried because of lots of them having to take off a point for not taking it up the bum and orgasming just from the joys of the pleasure it gives their partner (as one question asks about) , or fretting about whether their forehead is the ideal height or their lips are not the right width, and crap like that.


Yeah, isn't the neurotypical world crazy and f****d up?

I agree with you there. It doesn't change the accuracy of the test for what it was purported to measure.

If a testing meter showed high levels of poisonous mercury in your water supply, you should not attack the test based on the premise that mercury is a very bad thing to have in your water. I feel like that's basically what you are doing with this test: shooting the messenger.



Ladywoofwoof
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,879

28 Jul 2013, 3:20 am

I would say that the perception of lads' mag - style writers is pretty f****d up a lot of the time, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the world of NTs is f****d up.

How to get 7 points....

(1) Have been to a house party (ie a Skins party, for example) during the previous month.

(2) Get arrested. For anything.

(3) Get into a violent fight with another bloke, such that you're throwing punches and want to kill them

(4) Approach people at parties a lot, whether they seem interested or not.

(5) On a second date, move in to kiss a woman. If she says "slow down, I'm not that kind of girl" reply ”This could be trouble ’cause I’m that kind of guy.” *smirk*"

(6) Chat up a woman in the pub. When she requests that you buy her a drink, try to cadge a drink from her instead.

(7) After a night out, you are somehow both still together and arrive at your front door. There is obvious sexual tension and you want to (as the writer charmingly puts it) "clinch this deal". Don't say anything sensible. Instead, gibber the following : "“I’m thirsty. Are you thirsty? Let’s go inside and taste DC’s finest tap water. But you can only stay for a minute, I have to get up early.”"

;-) Just saying....



Lintar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,777
Location: Victoria, Australia

28 Jul 2013, 4:56 am

One of the more ridiculous, misguided and downright offensive 'tests' that I have ever come across, one that approves of getting into fist fights and being arrested - you score one point if either has happened to you! Typical neurotypical rubbish, where loud and offensive behaviour is seen as being something to admire.

If I ever met a girl who looked favourably upon either getting involved in fights or getting arrested, I would not want to know her, for it would reveal a great deal about her lack of morals, decency and sense.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

28 Jul 2013, 5:07 am

Are you REALLY taking that test seriously, Tyri0n?