J.P. Morgan wrote:
Put the details aside, what you’re trying to do is an exchange of "beauty" and "money": Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square.
However, there’s a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason. The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can’t be prettier year after year.
Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset. It’s not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later.
So why not just
rent her "beauty" for ten years, and then kick her to the curb?
J.P. Morgan wrote:
Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you.
Well, there you go, J.P.! There are literally
millions of such women out there, with millions more turning 18 every day.
It's a buyer's market, and the sellers are dealing in goods that lose their value with every tick of the clock.