Space wrote:
It is pretty common knowledge that dating sites give average women more credit than they are due. Girls who get no attention with in real life suddenly get 20 messages a day, and have dozens of guys to choose from. Then they get on their high horse and have long lists of requirements for a potential mate that get really ridiculous. Ever notice how many of the "success" stories from dating sites, are from women? For men, it seems like at best you can get some easy sex out of it if you know how to play the game right (e-dating is a game). It is a well kept secret among very good looking guys that if you look like Brad Pitt and you go onto lavalife etc then you will be swimming in p****. This is basically the extent of my knowledge on dating sites, take it for what it's worth.
What's wrong with being an average woman? Although I've never joined a dating site, I've looked through them enough to notice that most of the men AND the women aren't very attractive, and don't have interesting profiles. That doesn't mean none of them are worth dating - it just means that the men and women are in each other's league, but women get to be pickier.
The only reason women can be pickier is because there are less of them online, not because the women are lower quality than the men are. Although maybe you weren't saying that. Men also experience the success stories, just in a lower ratio because there aren't enough women to go around. It does suck when women use this to their advantage, but to be quite honest, if there are 20 guys messaging me, I'm going to pick the one I'm most interested in. (Read: Not necessarily the best looking, or with the most money...the one that I like the best). Tell me you wouldn't do the same if you had 20 women to pick from. I wouldn't even dream of a list of requirements....those women are not worth your time. But I'm not representative of all women, I know.