somanyspoons wrote:
Sorry, but I have to agree. Break = prelude to a break-up. It's just a slower, more painful way to end it.
Now, on the other hand, reevaluating the way we behave in our relationship to make more time for our individual interests - we can spend time doing things without one another and that's fine as long as we communicate about it - now that's something that could make your relationship stronger.
A break is nothing but an opportunity to sleep with other people and feel justified by it. I don't know if I've ever heard of a relationship coming back stronger after a break. I've heard of people getting back together, but they don't describe their break as in any way productive. I suppose almost loosing someone could make someone start to take the relationship more seriously, but then we are back to the prelude to a break up idea.
This is exactly what I was thinking.
And if they want to break up for a time, I don't see them as good marriage material. What would they do if you were married? Can't exactly take a break from that.
This reminds me of this reality show that I'm watching now. (No boos from the peanut gallery, please.) Anyway, it's called "Married At First Sight" and these two got married after being paired up by people who specialize in this sort of thing. It ended up after two weeks that they kept getting into fights and she said that she "needed a break". Well, now they are divorced, of course. This is why I think people don't take marriage seriously anymore. Their answer is let's just live together and that does not work because it's too easy to get out of. They don't want to try to sort out any disagreements. Why should they when they can just "take a break for awhile" and come back if the grass isn't greener on the other side? To me, that is just cheating (the legal way).
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.