hyperlexian wrote:
i don't think it is possible to be in love with someone when they do not return the feelings at all, as i consider love to be a two-way street.
well, does love has to be egostistical in order to be considered love? I mean, if love is unconditional and "without expecting much or anything in return", then it isn't really love? I think unrequited love can still be love, if you define love as "caring about someone".
About infatuation, well, I think it depends, if you actually know the person and have a friendship relationship with them but they don't see you romantically, that looks different from the other person never knowing you exist. In any case, it seems that infatuation and obsession still exist within romantic relationships.
I asked this question to see what people here thought about it, given that that would be somehow a typical scenario for most here.
My own take on it is that I personally find funny when people think that love is love only when is reciprocrated, otherwise it's not really love, unless you have a definition of love that differs from "caring about the person and hoping and doing the best for them", it doesn't make sense (love is love only if they love you back
). It seems more like a social convention than anything else, and social conventions don't have to make sense.
Quote:
at the same time, if the two people aren't even in a relationship or if they only know each other from a distance i don't think romantic love is possible. i would consider that to be obsession only.
well, I think two people should be in a relationship such as friendship in order for 'unrequited love' considered 'love' to make sense.