Jamesy wrote:
TheOther wrote:
I think the difference in a purely physical sense boils down to secondary sex characteristics.
That being said, to ignore the interpersonal aspect of it is to remove probably 80% of it. I would much prefer to have sex with someone that is average looking but with whom I have great sexual chemistry, than I would the most attractive person in the world with whom I have no chemistry.
You could figure out the sexiest look possible for you and achieve it, but if you still mess up the interpersonal aspect of it it will only help a little bit. I know short, skinny bald guys who get laid 1000% more than tall, fit, athletic guys I know because of the difference in their charisma.
A good rule of thumb is that looking good will get more people to talk to you in the first place, but only helps a little bit after you have begun talking.
women dont need charisma too get laid
Maybe not, but men definitely do. No amount of growing tall or getting buff will be enough without some level of interpersonal skills and charisma. It definitely wouldn't hurt, though!
Its like the 2 rules:
1. Be attractive.
2. Don't be unattractive.
Rule 1 means be physically good looking, but rule 2 means you can't have an unattractive personality, or have unattractive habits and mannerisms.