Izaak wrote:
Sorry to be contrary, and contrary at the same time, but I rather agree with Postperson.
I hope you're not too sorry; I'm finding the variety of opinions interesting, and I thank everyone for commenting; that is why I posted this here, to see some responses and hopefully start a discussion; and I'm glad people are commenting. I read the forums here and keep track of things; I posted link and quote knowing that many people here are married, or in relationships; I also know many people here have serious issues with relationship, maintaining them and often forming them at all; I'm in the dubious position of being in both boats.
My opening statements were admittedly overly bold, by design; I was curious to see how many might join me in my outrage, and how many might dissent; I expected a mixture, and I'm happy I got one. The statement I quoted is somewhat vague in places. Maybe it's partially correct; maybe its correct sometimes; maybe its correct for me and not for you, or visa versa. But I think she made the statement too strong, "by definition" people with AS have no "desire" to form relationships; I think this is wrong, and misleading. As usual, I like calandale's take, that social ability (or inability) is a hindrance; I thought the implied total lack of desire would set the wrong impression with people unfamiliar with AS, and this aggravated me. But that's just me; I'm glad to know what you all think.
I know my own non-verbal autistic son loves me, even though he can't express himself with words. And he reminds me of myself in more ways that I can count.
Good fortune,
- Icarus
_________________
Please forgive me if, in the heat of battle, I sometimes forget which side I'm on.