NicoleG wrote:
I don't understand your comment. Not wanting something doesn't have to have a valid reason to exist. A person can simply not want to be social, and some people do exist that simply do not want to be social. It has nothing to do with hurt feelings.
You're correct in that "wanting" and "needing" are not mutually exclusive, but you are making it sound as though if they are not mutually exclusive then they must be mutually inclusive, which is incorrect.
I take it you have never met someone that simply does not wish to be social, or dealt with a cat that never wanted anyone to touch it, ever.
"they should want to" in the second part of the question implies (for me) there is no need for social interaction. You cannot survive alone and thus need to interact. The not surviving alone part may even be more true for us then others so why deny, deep down, every human being desires interaction with other human beings, simply because they must, like they must eat, sleep or breathe.
Basicly, my observations of this world so far, lead me to believe not wanting social interaction is misguided thought. Once you experience comfortable social interaction, you will realize you want more. I have been the person that didn't "want" social interaction, but the more isolated I became, the unhappier I became. Social interaction defines and validates you as a human being. No matter what planet you are on. No matter how "bad" you are at it.
BTW, I think the cat probably does interact with other cats. Just a guess. If not, then consider touch is not the only way to communicate.