Have a normal conversation like an NT (lets "practice&a

Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


do you find yourself enjoing fairly banal chit chat (otherwise known as normal conversation) ??
Are you joking ---never do 26%  26%  [ 10 ]
sometimes 13%  13%  [ 5 ]
often 5%  5%  [ 2 ]
what is chit chat ? 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
only if i am in a very good mood 23%  23%  [ 9 ]
only if i know others very well 23%  23%  [ 9 ]
only if something has happened to me recently that is of intrest to others 8%  8%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 39

the-over-analyzed
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 266
Location: United States

05 Apr 2007, 6:28 pm

cellogirl42 wrote:
Oh my god. If that's what they mean everytime they talk, then I'm going to go crazy with paranoia. You sure they don't mean exactly what they say? Isn't it the body language?


Nah, I'm not sure at all. I'm totally clueless :) . Don't get paranoid over it.



ghostgurl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2006
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,328
Location: Orange County, CA

05 Apr 2007, 7:57 pm

My motto is if I don't get anything out of it why do it? Socializing is all an act and I don't want to play. :P


_________________
Currently Reading: Survival by Juliet E. Czerneda
http://dazed-girl.livejournal.com/
Vote Kalister 2008


calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

05 Apr 2007, 8:19 pm

ghostgurl wrote:
My motto is if I don't get anything out of it why do it? Socializing is all an act and I don't want to play. :P


I enjoy acting. I like playing. I just don't see the fun in banalities. Much more fun to just completely BS.



MrSinister
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,560
Location: England

08 Apr 2007, 4:55 pm

lab_pet wrote:
There is so much I do not understand. Mostly, I don't care. No, wait, I profoundly don't care. RE: NTs mysterious social (lack of) talking patterns.......

1) Why does it seemingly go so quickly (& therefore I assume naturally) for them? If I should ever have something to contribute (don't laugh) how would I edge it in? Too fast....I respond slowly.


If you have something to say, but can't get it out in time before the conversation moves on, cough politely. That should get people's attention long enough for you to say what you want to say.

Of course, personally speaking, I often have to cough politely just to "reset" my voicebox after a bout of pronounced stammering, so that doesn't always work for me ;)

lab_pet wrote:
2) Why are they so repetitive over time? Further, this reinforces they have a really poor memory - but there is something else at play, I'm sure. I mean by this: why does co-worker X relate the same version of her husband, M, to co-worker Y, and vice versa, over and over^(1/0)? I'm passively listening and could write a personality profile right now of both co-worker X & co-worker Y's respective husbands. Why do they feel the need to elaborate? Incidentally, I've never met either of these husbands but I know some quite intimate details about them!


I have a co-worker who's just the same. Every time he comes into work (he only works on a Wednesday, Thursday and Friday) we're treated to a lengthy treatise on what's going on in his life right now. Most of the time I try to block it out, or respond with what I think is a witty remark.

lab_pet wrote:
2.5) If they're married, then a safe assumption is they're having sex. So, then, why is not ok if I happen to mention something of a sexual natutre, in a discrete manner? We're all adults. Oh, wait, I think I know.....sex taboo. But, at the same time, sex is fun and I know even NT's sometimes think about sex (yes)?


Yeah, sex is pretty taboo. It's best not to go anywhere near this (although this is a "do as I say, not as I do" moment, as I've put my foot in it about this too many times to count).

lab_pet wrote:
3) If I accidentally say something, because I'm trying hard, and make a mistake (I can be really stupid) how can one "untalk" out of it? For instance, during lunch break time, co-worker Y was talking about recipes (she likes to cook). Plus, earlier Y and another were talking about Internet stuff. The previous evening I was looking up something and drifted onto a site about cannibalism. Apparently humans go well with sage. Hint: This is does not make for good NT banter!


I'm not surprised ;) I've done some similar stuff and stopped conversations dead in their tracks, though, so you're not alone.

lab_pet wrote:
Y was not amused, perhaps even physically nauseous. I am (and was) sorry, which I expressed. Still, how do I undo it? Admittedly, I think the sage human marinade recipe was wildly funny, but I won't reveal that.


I think it's just a case of learning to tailor your conversation to who you're talking to. From the sounds of things, Y is the squeamish type, so opting to talk about something that most people find pretty icky was a bad move.

lab_pet wrote:
My point, why are NTs often so rigid? And not forgiving?


Because they're NTs, and they don't understand, a lot of the time.

lab_pet wrote:
I am very shy. Please don't be harsh.....just advice. Don't be meant to me or tease me. I am very sensitive. Does anyone know why though (above 3)?


Hey, we're all in the same boat here - I don't think anybody would be mean to you for having problems relating to other people. Chin up :)


_________________
Why so serious?


lab_pet
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 117
Location: Alaska

08 Apr 2007, 5:05 pm

Deeply thank you, even just for listening to my words.


_________________
same nightmare, different nap


MrSinister
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,560
Location: England

08 Apr 2007, 6:03 pm

lab_pet wrote:
Deeply thank you, even just for listening to my words.


No problem 8)


_________________
Why so serious?


driftwood
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 23
Location: bedfordshire, United Kingdom

10 Apr 2007, 5:20 pm

cellogirl42 wrote:
the-over-analyzed wrote:

DUDE #1: Wasssup.

DUDE #2: Wassup.

DUDE #1: I saw you rushing in the door to clock in. Were you late or what? (I hope you were late so it will make me look better by comparison)

I have a hard time getting here on time. You? (I hope you say yes so I can hold it against you in the future)

DUDE #2: Nah, I just made it though (Why is this dude so worried about my punctuality? I can use against him the fact that he has a hard time getting here)


DUDE #2: Cool shoes. Where'd you get them? (Those shoes make you look gay and probably cost a fortune)


DUDE #1(still seated): Thanks.U think so. Just something I bought in a hurry.(These shoes make me look so awesome. They cost half my last paycheck. You wish you had them.)





Oh my god.
If that's what they mean everytime they talk, then I'm going to go crazy with paranoia.
You sure they don't mean exactly what they say? Isn't it the body language?






====================================================
Had a long chat with my coucilor about this , of persons talk OFTEN having a hidden maybe negetive meaning . ( BTW think having a sympethetic non specialist councilar on balance v. helpfull . Feel specialist thro no fault miss person being blinded by the theory. Have seen this counciler for a month, after long break from proffesional help)

Her conclusions seamed a little vague and confusing to follow but as interpretting people depends ( acording to her) very much upon person speaking , and your past knowlege of this guy ( no hard and fast rules WHAT SO EVER) guess that is just how it is..


=====================

Conclusions COUNCILAR GAVE ME ... (bearing in mind that I have just returned from pub for a jar or 3)...

1) for majority chatting at some point in day is essential , enjoyable and usefull (relaxing , social contact , networking , learning things etc )

2) often (did not say how often) extracting clues from chat/social interaction is hard for NT too ("is this dinner with a girl when you are a man a date or not" "is this invitation to meet up soon genuine or politeness" ETC)

3) my councilers sudjestion is to take people almost always on face value. Analysing what they say may send one "loopy"(metaphorically) , lead to wrong conclusions , stress u for no reason etc.

4) my objection was books say something like 30% of ALL communication is non-verbal (IE dont just look at the "words of the script"). Most people I said can pick up on at least some of this , even aspies... So non verbal communicans happens , even within a play or film and be an importaint part of the whole. So one can not ignore it .. it is info being communicated. So what happens to people with very low understanding of non-verbal . Should they study and make effort to pick up. Here i
the answer given seamed quite vague. But think what she was trying to say is , if u cant read it well ,dont guess and you will still do ok.


ok. how did my ramble go.... its a "big can of worms" to be sure :?

So there way be hidden meanings but no need to try to guess ,take at face value when possible (modified by prev experence of same person). Sounds reasnable ,no


===

(( quick final point . I belive one should learn and sometimes fake normal social interaction. Belive that to do so for a couple of hours each month minimum this WILL prove very handy to you. Case in point. Most members of opposite sex need time -,say couple of weeks- to get to know you ,so as to know are you compatible , u are you trustworthy- before dating however strong their initial gut reaction is . They only way most (95% say) do this is thro polite possibly banal conversation . If you dont take part you cant get on their "list" of potential boy/girlfriend , end of story. When looked at it this way its quite reasnable really ???.Think so ))

---- thanks for listening. realise this covers many points and non-verbal was not main point of thread!!



driftwood
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 23
Location: bedfordshire, United Kingdom

10 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm

also

a major part of NT conversation v aspie communications style ( acording to my counclier and something I was inclining to anyway) , is (((just by the nature of the aspies love of detail and accuracy)))


(most) NT give short , vaguer ,maybe "oversimplified" short sentence replies in conversation. (Guess how they prefer it , sometimes/often I prefer this way too).

========================================================

A humerous example , given on UK national radio station , during their "studio banter" was the following. --(( note= person giving poor communication is meant to be an NT. AS problems are not on the radar of any major radio station , u can trust me on that))




NOTE topic was "Things that annoy you , when someone is talking to you"..

Guy is telling a dramatic story, and gets side tracked.


Someone tells you about the time an axe murderer entered the house and the person talking goes ... " the axe man appeared on the tuesday , monday ....tuesday. No must have been a tuesday as the soap had just finished on the telly and my dinner was getting cold ...."

and you are there thinking ".. I dont care about what day it was. Just tell me about the F@@@ing axeman cant you" :lol:
:D


(PS note to self - dont post about the pitfalls of getting sidetracked and start to ramble yourself :D


:D )