Edna3362 wrote:
It's kinda simple; and here's an example:
I don't have to believe if I'm a good or a bad person -- but someone else will interpret it as such regardless.
If I firmly believe that I'm either a good or a bad person, I'd end up spending my time and energy 'preserving' or 'fighting' that belief by attempting to persuade others of what they may interpret otherwise.
Potentially in expense of everything including myself -- there lies the problem.
Personally, I'd rather use anyone's assumptions and 'habits' against them.
With or without any explanations, prompts or 'sharing' why-I-did-X because there are no real wrong or right 'actions' or even impressions of.
But there are always will be the right and wrong 'times' for it -- that includes disclosure.
Because I'm too reactive and inconsistent to act reliably out of intent or even any plan -- I tend to take and make out from what I get.
I agree with you about believing we are neither good nor bad. We just are.
The amount of energy it takes to change someone else or a group of other people is massive and most probably futile anyway. It is much easier for us to change the way we view or feel about them by understanding and accepting some people will not want to be your friend or acquaintance.
The relationships worth nurturing are those where people do show some interest and acceptance of us. Relationships with intimacy do require open and honest disclosure, but that does not mean autism which is very very personal and a choice to be pondered at length before revealing to a stranger.
Gifts are a funny one. Because you don't need to have gifts to have a lovely relationship with others. But sometimes a thoughtful gift can say what we cannot say in words - some people are action and gift oriented and less eloquent with words and physical touch.
At the end of the day, if someone is being mean you can walk away and use your love on someone who actually deserves it.
There are billions of sociable people in this world. Enough for us all to get by.